I thought that too.
The difference between catholic priests being kiddy fiddlers and my Prophet being a rapist is that one is accurate and the other is not.
"My Prophet?"
me said:ATTN: Anonymous
The appropriate response to threats of this sort isn't knocking the site of the Internet. These guys are probably cheap enough to be hosted on a shared server, which means you took down a couple of dozen other sites for the sins of one in particular.
Furthermore, even if they weren't hosted on a shared site, you really think that the appropriate response to people using threats to silence other people is to . . . silence other people?
Irony much?
Yes, because the age of consent and marriage was exactly the same in Arabia in the 7th century as it is today in the U.S. :roll:
Marriage was often a way to help widows and orphaned girls, more like adoption.
That's why they had polygamy too. You don't even know if they had sex.
Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3310:
'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64
Narrated 'Aisha:
that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).
Nice Nowism.
< Sunni Muslim
Yeah because a nine year old girl and an old man having sex is a disgusting practice that transcends time.
I wanted to go to the original source of the threat to read it for myself, but I can't. Anonymous, in a karmic bit of epic humor, took the site down with a DDoS attack.
Yeah ... that is not evidence.
Do you have witnesses? Perhaps a statement that she is raped? Hell, you can even go through the Qu'ran to try and find where he raped her. Marriage is not rape, however much you attempt to make it swing the other way.
Apparently not.
Yeah because a nine year old girl and an old man having sex is a disgusting practice that transcends time. Roll your eyes all you want but child rape is child rape in this century or the very first.
Except thats not what happened here.
The hell I don't
Nice irrelevant post from you.
And no, Prophet Mohammed did not consumate the marriage at 9 years old.
Don't be obtuse. You know full well what your holy books say about the matter. A 54 year old man having sex with a nine year old girl before she goes back to play with her dolls is child rape no matter what pedophile arrangement was made before some heathen priest.
Don't be obtuse. You know full well what your holy books say about the matter. A 54 year old man having sex with a nine year old girl before she goes back to play with her dolls is child rape no matter what pedophile arrangement was made before some heathen priest.
That's not what your holy books just stated. :shrug:
It apparently wasn't child rape in 7th century Arabia. So get over it.
Apparently so.
Now you tell me. I'm sitting here lecturing you about Islam!
HADITHS IS NOT THE QU'RAN.
My goodness.
The Qu'ran is the holy book.
Well, no. You just gave an example yourself of when it wasn't.
Child rape is child rape.
Glad to see you approve of child rape as long as it's just a little arabic girl.
No, you just disagreed. But you are wrong. Child rape is child rape.
I thought it was common knowledge I was a Muslim lol
Hadiths are taught in tandem with the Qu'ran.
And they state, unequivocally, that Mohammed consummated his marriage with 9 year old Aisha. :shrug:
Nah, you don't yell "kill the infidels" enough. That's what Muslims say, I learned it on this board. :mrgreen:
(It's a joke, people).
Yeah, its a shame I do not live up to the sterotype lol
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?