• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sotomayor Blasts Supreme Court's 'Unconscionably Irreconcilable' Decision

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
111,851
Reaction score
102,077
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent

Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered a stinging rebuke of the Supreme Court's decision to clear the way to allow sweeping immigration operations in Los Angeles. The Supreme Court on Monday handed the Trump administration a victory on its immigration policy, overturning a lower court's ruling that had prevented federal agents from enforcing immigration operations based solely on factors such as race, job, location, or the language spoken. Critics of this policy argued that it intruded on people's civil liberties. The conservative majority ruled 6-3 to overturn the ruling, with Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson also joining the dissent. Sotomayor slammed the majority opinion as "yet another grave misuse of our emergency docket." "We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low wage job," she said. "Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent." She warned that the concurrence has "all but declared that all Latinos, U.S. citizens or not, who work low wage jobs are fair game to be seized at any time, taken away from work, and held until they provide proof of their legal status to the agents' satisfaction." The Fourth Amendment would prohibit the government from seizing individuals based on a "set of facts that 'describes a very large category of presumably innocent' people," she wrote. "Countless people in the Los Angeles area have been grabbed, thrown to the ground, and handcuffed simply because of their looks, their accents, and the fact they make a living by doing manual labor. Today, the Court needlessly subjects countless more to these exact same indignities," Sotomayor wrote. Sotomayor concluded by describing the ruling as being "unconscionably irreconcilable with our Nation's constitutional guarantees" to be "free from arbitrary interference by law officers."

Trump's conservative Roberts "rubber stamp" Court majority gave its imprimatur to once again legalize racial profiling.

coffee-cup-rings.png
 



Trump's conservative Roberts "rubber stamp" Court majority gave its imprimatur to once again legalize racial profiling.

coffee-cup-rings.png
Sotomayor is kind of dim. Something has to be done to get the illegal aliens out. What she should be doing is condemning la for being a sanctuary.
 
A national ID smart card replacement for the Social Security card could help resolve the issue.
 
A new court will be required to undo some of the damage, but unfortunately, the damage is now significantly greater than can be addressed just by packing the court.
 
Sotomayor is kind of dim. Something has to be done to get the illegal aliens out. What she should be doing is condemning la for being a sanctuary.

Actually, she is correct. And the actual majority opinion of the court mentioned what Sotomayor is saying but said the intentions of the government outweigh civil liberty in this case.

That is what she is talking about, and the "something has to be done" by Constitutionally questionable actions suggest your support of ignoring the Constitution when convenient to do so. The same convenience the Trump Administration is looking for and his paid for in advance thus rubber stamp Supreme Court majority gave him.
 
If Republicans were going to dehumanize a group, I wish it would have been people who actually cause harm like drivers who exceed the speed limit or don’t follow the car in front of them at a safe distance.
 
A national ID smart card replacement for the Social Security card could help resolve the issue.

Having a valid state-issued REAL ID should be sufficient, since many foreign nationals are here legally. If (sanctuary?) states are issuing REAL IDs to illegal aliens then those states should lose federal funding.
 
Sometimes pragmatism wins over ideology. The needs of the many wins over the discomfort and inconvenience of the few.
 
Sometimes pragmatism wins over ideology.
The ideology of God given constitutional rights?

The needs of the many wins over the discomfort and inconvenience of the few.
Yes, I believe that's called the tyranny of the majority. This has been used to support Trump's first term.

Consistency seems to be lacking.
 
Sometimes pragmatism wins over ideology. The needs of the many wins over the discomfort and inconvenience of the few.

That could be largely accomplished by having an eVerify mandate, coupled with changes to the FIT code, allowing the IRS to act as the primary enforcement mechanism. If the (W-2 and 1099) employment ‘magnet’ was removed then many (if not most) illegal aliens would elect to self-deport.
 
Sotomayor is kind of dim. Something has to be done to get the illegal aliens out. What she should be doing is condemning la for being a sanctuary.

And you support blatant racial profiling being the something that is done?
 
It's important to hear Sotomayer's voice here, because the courts seem far from the real world. It sounds like the ruling allows only a contributing factor to a quick stop to ask about immigration status if you're in with a crowd of illegal immigrants, but I get the feeling that the facts on the ground look very different.
 
Having a valid state-issued REAL ID should be sufficient, since many foreign nationals are here legally. If (sanctuary?) states are issuing REAL IDs to illegal aliens then those states should lose federal funding.
As legal entry into the U.S. is not a State issue but a Federal issue, any ID should like the Social Security numbers be Federally created and maintained with some law enforcement access. IMO, State and local governments should work closely with ICE to rectify the illegal entry issue and there should be NO sanctuary States or cities, simply a population where all inhabitants maintain a legal temporary or permanent residency within the U.S.A. with clear penalties defined for those who do not. Though I live abroad, my 77 year old barely readable Social Security card remains in my wallet.
Law enforcement/ICE could simply insert the card into a reader, see a photo, name, age, current address, outstanding warrants if any, visa validity, etc. for the person stopped and act if needed or let them go on their way based on what they find.
 
If Republicans were going to dehumanize a group, I wish it would have been people who actually cause harm like drivers who exceed the speed limit or don’t follow the car in front of them at a safe distance.
Can ICE give out speeding tickets?
 
-Seized for speaking Spanish.
-Held in horrible conditions.

Nobody has a right to avoid this.

This is conservative America.

Anyone working a low wage job, appearing to be Hispanic, or speaking Spanish must now carry on their persons at all times proof that they have a simple right to exist in America.

If you're swimming at the beach, you better have this proof in a watertight packet firmly attached to your body.

If you're working out in a gym - same thing.

If you're appearing in a play - better have it under your costume.

If you're jogging on the street - you guessed it.

If you're competing in a sporting event - yes, same thing.

A ballerina or dancer - no exceptions.

The absurdity and insensitivity of conservatives is turning America fascist right before our eyes.
 



Trump's conservative Roberts "rubber stamp" Court majority gave its imprimatur to once again legalize racial profiling.

coffee-cup-rings.png
Yup. The SCOTUS is illegitimate and corrupt. It is no longer representative of the people. The right-wing on the SCOTUS are nothing but Trump ball-jugglers. They are a disgrace to this country and to the legal profession.

1757688654120.webp
 
Yup. The SCOTUS is illegitimate and corrupt. It is no longer representative of the people. The right-wing on the SCOTUS are nothing but Trump ball-jugglers. They are a disgrace to this country and to the legal profession.

Six of the nine Justices - Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett are affilliated with the Federalist Society, in addition to hundreds of lower federal court judges. The kingpin at the Society at the times of their appointments was Board member Leonard Leo, a "conservative activist". While the Federalist Society Justices profess to be "originalists", they are all first and foremost champions of the Unitary Executive Theory. Leo served at the Federalist Society in various capacities for more than 25 years. When an opportunity arose for a Republican president to nominate a Justice/Judge.... they were provided with a short-sheet of acceptable candidates by Leo. In effect, the Roberts Court is the Leonard Leo Court. This is another area in which Republicans have surrendered their Constitutional perogatives to an outside organization funded by dark money.
 
Back
Top Bottom