Sorry Anti-Choicers - SCOTUS is wrong.

[JoeB131]

It's not meant to be replied to...you've made every one of those clear in your previous posts. The only things to discuss are the last 2 questions at the bottom...which you continually refuse to answer. Please do. There's nothing else to discuss until you do.

I get it, you don't want to really have a discussion, you just want to shout down anyone who says abortion is a bad thing, even if they concede outlawing it would be impractical.

See? That's a statement, your opinion. Not an argument, just your feelings. You cannot articulate one. On a debate forum

Never heard anyone refer to an unborn child as a "Fetus", they almost always refer to it at "the Baby".

No "gymnastics", women should (and do in some states) be able to have abortions whenever they need to. It's pretty simple. That you struggle with it is a limitation at your end.

I think you are confusing "need" and "want".

Most women don't "Need" an abortion. They will deliver a perfectly healthy baby in nine months.

They "Want" an abortion, often for fairly selfish reasons.

That's almost accurate...except is the unborn, not a baby. And it's certainly not an argument. Why is it wrong?

Maybe you should reconsider posting on a discussion forum until you can debate something...rather than make statements you cant back up with reasoned arguments. "Deal with it"

"The unborn" is another euphamism. I'm surprised you aren't trying to use "meat byproduct", it would about as honest.

 

[quip]

I think you are confusing "need" and "want".

Most women don't "Need" an abortion. They will deliver a perfectly healthy baby in nine months.

They "Want" an abortion, often for fairly selfish reasons.

So.
We live in a selfish world. Idealistic wishes aren't going to change that.

 

[Gordy327]

I get it, you don't want to really have a discussion, you just want to shout down anyone who says abortion is a bad thing, even if they concede outlawing it would be impractical.

More projection and you still haven't explained why abortion is bad.

Never heard anyone refer to an unborn child as a "Fetus", they almost always refer to it at "the Baby".

A fetus is what it is, because science!

I think you are confusing "need" and "want".

You just seem confused.

Most women don't "Need" an abortion. They will deliver a perfectly healthy baby in nine months.

They "Want" an abortion, often for fairly selfish reasons.

Irrelevant! Whether they want or need is entirely up to them.

"The unborn" is another euphamism. I'm surprised you aren't trying to use "meat byproduct", it would about as honest.

They're more akin to a parasite or a tumor.

 

[Lursa]

I get it, you don't want to really have a discussion, you just want to shout down anyone who says abortion is a bad thing, even if they concede outlawing it would be impractical.

Never heard anyone refer to an unborn child as a "Fetus", they almost always refer to it at "the Baby".

I think you are confusing "need" and "want".

Most women don't "Need" an abortion. They will deliver a perfectly healthy baby in nine months.

They "Want" an abortion, often for fairly selfish reasons.

"The unborn" is another euphamism. I'm surprised you aren't trying to use "meat byproduct", it would about as honest.

The only things to discuss are the last 2 questions at the bottom, which form the basis for anything else...which you continually refuse to answer. Please do. There's nothing else to discuss until you do. If you cant argue why abortion is wrong...you HAVE no discussion Just your opinions

 

[JoeB131]

I'm done with thread.

 

[Gordy327]

I'm done with thread.

Your surrender is accepted.

 

[Lursa]

I'm done with thread.

You were never able to explain why abortion is wrong...which is kinda key to the issue. Your opinions elicited during the attempts tho certainly didnt lead to any moral enlightening.

 

[JoeB131]

Again, done with this thread, and you know why.

 

[Gordy327]

Again, done with this thread, and you know why.

Yes, because you could not explain why abortion is wrong and are now running away when called out and challenged.

 

[Lursa]

Again, done with this thread, and you know why.

Didnt like being confronted with a compendium of your "opinions"? Those posts were either inhumane or irrational, or both. If you thought that posting those was "better" than providing the most basic argument re: why abortion is wrong (if you believe it is)...well that's also hard to imagine but that basic discussion was always what I and others were seeking.

 

[Lursa]

Yes, because you could not explain why abortion is wrong and are now running away when called out and challenged.

It's not like we didnt ask. Many times. Almost every post. We came to discuss, he came to complain that "life today aint like it used to be"...when life was great for a white middle or upper class male. For everyone else...it was less of everything for women/gays/minorities. Including respect.

But debate was always our request.

 

[Gordy327]

It's not like we didnt ask. Many times. Almost every post. We came to discuss, he came to complain that "life today aint like it used to be"...when life was great for a white middle or upper class male. For everyone else...it was less of everything for women/gays/minorities. Including respect.

But debate was always our request.

Sounds like he was stuck in the past and couldn't get over it. All he has is the same repetition and feelings.