• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo

W_Heisenberg

Trade Representative of Heard and McDonald Islands
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 6, 2019
Messages
27,649
Reaction score
30,754
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
Doesn't matter. Only what Trump says matters to them.
 
Well, we all knew that Sondland was going to have to “correct” his prior testimony.

Right now, I’d guess he’s regretting writing that million dollar check to Trump’s slush fund (whoops! I mean Inaugural Committee).
 
Ruh ro, this is why the Trumpers have been walking back the QPQ argument. We did it now what are gonna do?
 
“Substantial update”? That’s a bit of an understatement.
 
Ruh ro, this is why the Trumpers have been walking back the QPQ argument. We did it now what are gonna do?

I think Trump supporters like Hannity, Limbaugh, Jim Jordan, Nunes, and so on, will pursue a two-pronged strategy:

1. They will throw Rudy under the metaphorical bus, and they will then back up the bus and roll over him repeatedly until his body resembles that of raw hamburger.

2. They will continue to conduct a prolonged campaign of demonizing Democrats and normalizing corruption.
 
Wow. So the guy who texted that it isn't quid pro quo is now the guy saying "yea, this was actually quid pro quo".

How are Trump supporters going to lie about this? Can't wait to find out.
 
^ None of the above.

Trump supporters will say this is hearsay, just his opinion, and he's not credible testimony, and that his cousin's-brother-father-in-law has donated to the Sanders campaign and that he's a lifelong democrat.
 
Well, we all knew that Sondland was going to have to “correct” his prior testimony.

Right now, I’d guess he’s regretting writing that million dollar check to Trump’s slush fund (whoops! I mean Inaugural Committee).

Nothing like incredibly wealthy people trying to buy a job that they aren't intelligent enough or ethical enough to earn....
 
Yow. I just saw this come across live on Fox, and even they are reporting it verbatim without spinning it. I suppose that will change by the time programming gets to Hannity & Ingraham.
 
I think it's time we stop calling it "quid pro quo" and start calling it extortion.
 
Wow. So the guy who texted that it isn't quid pro quo is now the guy saying "yea, this was actually quid pro quo".

How are Trump supporters going to lie about this? Can't wait to find out.

They'll retreat to so what, everyone does it.
 
^ None of the above.

Trump supporters will say this is hearsay, just his opinion, and he's not credible testimony, and that his cousin's-brother-father-in-law has donated to the Sanders campaign and that he's a lifelong democrat.

That and continuing to bellow about “processs”

One of them is busy right now on that argument, falsely claiming that the rules were just changed.
 
Wow. So the guy who texted that it isn't quid pro quo is now the guy saying "yea, this was actually quid pro quo".

How are Trump supporters going to lie about this? Can't wait to find out.

I think it goes something like this:

giphy.gif
 
Nothing like incredibly wealthy people trying to buy a job that they aren't intelligent enough or ethical enough to earn....


And then going around like they own the world, like the rest of these idiots on Trump’s team.

This is the same guy who told Yanokovich to kiss Trump’s ass in a tweet as a way of keeping her job.

It looks like Sondland is being measured for the frame (at the moment).
 
Meanwhile...at the RNC

 
... would not receive American military aid unless it publicly committed to investigations President Trump wanted

To all those dummies claiming it's Ok for Trump to ask to investigate corruption, clearly, he could care less about investigation. He wanted PUBLIC announcement from Ukraine so he could SMEAR his political opponent.

Anyone who wants to know the truth would not want investigation to be public, e.g. so as not to alert any potential suspects and related witnesses.
 
Waiting for the propagandists to come on this thread and lie, divert and gaslight.

You have to wait for them to get the official narrative. But once it's Tweeted out, they'll regurgitate it. Have no fear.
 
Back
Top Bottom