• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Some religious opinions can be shown to be true or false by logic and evidence.

Do you agree with the premise in the OP

  • Total voters
    20
  • Poll closed .
Cephus got it. The thing is, the Abrahamic god is defined by the believers in a nonsensical, but descriptive way. If you're going to tell me that's wrong, then it is NOT the Abrahamic god. You're basically trying to turn it into some completely different god with completely different descriptors in order to make it work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom