Some on Mueller’s Team See Their Findings as More Damaging for Trump Than Barr Revealed

[Irwin Corey]

And nobody has.

It appears they have!

 

[KLATTU]

"LAFFFF" ?? How old are you, ten?
port.

YES! And Even a ten year old like me knows Barr wouldn't be stupid enough to lie about what's in that report.

And speaking of stupid peopl, you be amazed how many people are clinging to that fairy tale!

#LAFFGIGGLE

 

[KLATTU]

It appears they have!

No.They haven't .

NAMES please?

 

[KLATTU]

"Last week you all were saying “IF Barr isn’t being candid wouldn’t someone from Mueller’s team speak up?”. Well … they have!

No. Nobody has.


Names please??

all you have is gossip from the wholyl unreliable NYT. ( who has been wrong at every turn on this matter.)

 

[Irwin Corey]

No.They haven't .

NAMES please?

No. Nobody has.


Names please??

all you have is gossip from the wholyl unreliable NYT. ( who has been wrong at every turn on this matter.)

As Will Rogers said; "All I know is what I read in the papers". As, all you know is what you learn from Faux News.

 

[HumblePi]

YES! And Even a ten year old like me knows Barr wouldn't be stupid enough to lie about what's in that report.

And speaking of stupid peopl, you be amazed how many people are clinging to that fairy tale!

#LAFFGIGGLE

Have fun pretending you're a reasonable adult.

 

[Helix]

They won't be.
They haven't been for two years.
NYtimes =DEM shills

You're like the kid who wont give up believing in Santa.

For 2 years you soooooooooooooooooo wishe Mueller would come up something.
He didn't.

No you sooooooooooooooooo wish he did but Barr was lying.


#FAIRY TALE

We'll see. Something seems very fishy.

 

[KLATTU]

As Will Rogers said; "All I know is what I read in the papers". As, all you know is what you learn from Faux News.

Well in this case Faux news has been right all along and the NYtimes has been wrong.So maybe yuo should start listening.

You might learn something besides DEM gossip

 

[KLATTU]

We'll see. Something seems very fishy.

It sure does.
Report clears Trump.
We then get a GOSSIP report from he NYTIMEs desperately trying to keep the collusion fairy tale alive.

Of course it's as obvious as the nose on your face, but since you don't WANT to see it, you dont.

 

[Irwin Corey]

Well in this case Faux news has been right all along and the NYtimes has been wrong.So maybe yuo should start listening.

You might learn something besides DEM gossip

I'll pass on Faux Hate News … thanks! Then again I read, a lot, and listen to very little mainstream news; actually I "listen" to none.

 

[KLATTU]

I'll pass on Faux Hate News … thanks! Then again I read, a lot, and listen to very little mainstream news; actually I "listen" to none.

"HATE'
#LAFFRIOT
Haven'y you guys milked that cliche to death yet?

 

[Helix]

It sure does.
Report clears Trump.
We then get a GOSSIP report from he NYTIMEs desperately trying to keep the collusion fairy tale alive.

Of course it's as obvious as the nose on your face, but since you don't WANT to see it, you dont.

Odd that Barr would whitewash an exoneration. Very odd indeed.

 

[veritas1]

Barr knows he was exposed as a fraud.

The fraud is the entire Russia narrative, except where Hillary is concerned, of course. There we had actual and documented collusion.

 

[Irwin Corey]

"HATE'
#LAFFRIOT
Haven'y you guys milked that cliche to death yet?

Are you calling Hannity and Company a cliché?

 

[Grim17]

Just last week ya’ll were saying if Barr wasn’t being completely frank someone from Mueller’s team would speak up.

I believe what was being said was, if Barr's summery wasn't factual or didn't accurately represent the report, that Robert Mueller himself would speak up... and thus far, he hasn't.

 

[Irwin Corey]

I believe what was being said was, if Barr's summery wasn't factual or didn't accurately represent the report, that Robert Mueller himself would speak up... and thus far, he hasn't.

"I" remember them saying "Mueller or part of his team would certainly speak up", it appears they have!

 

[Luckyone]

That's the point, that the SP Law sates the AG issues a summary, not the report in its entirety. So are we a nation of laws or not?

That opens a big can of beans.

I read the following: “The DOJ regulations really do leave it up to Barr to decide,”

but in the same article, I read the following: "Barr is currently operating within the confines of the special-counsel regulations, which were written as a reaction to the independent-counsel rules. Those rules expired in 1998 at the end of the Whitewater investigation. Unlike Mueller, Ken Starr, the independent counsel at the time, was obligated to send his final report to Congress rather than the attorney general"

the big problem (can of beans) is: "The House Democrats’ position now is that “there is nothing stopping Barr from giving us the grand-jury material” that informed Mueller’s findings, according to another Democratic staffer who spoke with reporters on Thursday on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. “If he doesn’t, then that amounts to a cover-up.”

This is all somewhat unclear as far as the law is concerned.What is clear is that there is no reason not to make the report public. Anything less than that could be seen as covering up the truth without a good reason to do so and/or collusion (Barr and Trump).

The reality is that this affects all of us Americans and this is not a security issue where release of the information will put us in physical jeopardy!

 

[tres borrachos]

The fraud is the entire Russia narrative, except where Hillary is concerned, of course. There we had actual and documented collusion.

I missed Mueller's report where he said we had "actual and documented collusion where Hillary is concerned.". Of course you can link, yes? At least we'll all get to see his report and not the partisan letter from Trump toadie Barr.

 

[Grim17]

"I" remember them saying "Mueller or part of his team would certainly speak up", it appears they have!

Which ones have spoken up?

 

[Irwin Corey]

Which ones have spoken up?

So far, it appears they've chosen to remain anonymous. Barr better straighten up and fly right or they might not remain so.

 

[veritas1]

I missed Mueller's report where he said we had "actual and documented collusion where Hillary is concerned.". Of course you can link, yes? At least we'll all get to see his report and not the partisan letter from Trump toadie Barr.

Mueller wasn't tasked with investigating Hillary's connection to Russians. Perhaps someone else will be.

 

[Grim17]

So far, it appears they've chosen to remain anonymous. Barr better straighten up and fly right or they might not remain so.

Anonymous huh?

It's Mueller's name on the damned thing, so one would think that if what Barr wrote wasn't an accurate representation of the reports conclusions, Robert Mueller would be the one standing up and saying something...

 

[veritas1]

"Last week you all were saying “IF Barr isn’t being candid wouldn’t someone from Mueller’s team speak up?”. Well … they have!

No, that isn't what was said. We said that if Barr was inaccurate, then MUELLER would say so. It's his name on the report, after all.

 

[TamleeB]

So far, it appears they've chosen to remain anonymous. Barr better straighten up and fly right or they might not remain so.

What exactly do you mean by "straighten up and fly right"? He issued a summary of the report with the help of Rosenstein. I believe he will release the entire report, with some redactions having to do with Grand Jury testimony. It will not change the FACTS. There are no more indictments and the Mueller investigation has concluded.

 

[KLATTU]

Anonymous huh?

It's Mueller's name on the damned thing, so one would think that if what Barr wrote wasn't an accurate representation of the reports conclusions, Robert Mueller would be the one standing up and saying something...

Please -. Don't attempt common sense.

Better to believe gossip whispered into the ears of a NY Times Dem operative/reporter