• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Some far-left groups have encouraged peaceful protests to turn violent, experts say

TamleeB said:
Hilarious….you jumped on the thread that was about me. Funny how now you are pretending to be coy.
Click to expand...
Oh I'm not being coy at all, since I'm usually more direct even when I'm coy. I was actually referring to Trump as the sourpuss who's still complaining about the election being stolen. Oh, and the thread is not about you.
 
ElChupacabra said:
I'm not. If I were I would have tagged you like I did the last time, but come to think of it you made a mess out of that as well and claimed I had no integrity. So confusing.
Click to expand...
Like I said you jumped on a response with my name being mentioned and replied
“Yeah, then again we have a sourpuss who still stands by the "they stole the election from me, precious!" narrative so...”
Who exactly were you referring to who, since the post clearly referred to me? I open to hearing whomever you were referencing.
 

If protesters/rioters surround you and try to get in your vehicle, you bet you should leave, whether or not you may hit pedestrians. One has a right to self preservation. We’ve seen as much during the BLM protests.
 
Here's where understanding the use of bold comes in, and that's where I bolded the sentence about the MAGA and referred to the one who still complains about the election. If I were referring to you, I would have tagged you specifically.
 
I assumed he was referring to the pantheon of MAGA on this site who to this day insist that the 2020 election was stolen. One even claims to have incontrovertible proof although he's never gotten around to sharing it. Basically, the people that you go out of your away to avoid openly disagreeing with, because disagreeing with your fellow soldiers who claim the 2020 election was stolen is a surefire ticket to RINO status.
 
I don’t know if Hatians were eating cats or not, do you? I never backed up Trumps claim, did I? Yet you accused me of doing such. So how about you set the record straight and admit that you were incorrect in your assumption. You owe me an apology for your false claim.
 
ElChupacabra said:
Here's where understanding the use of bold comes in, and that's where I bolded the sentence about the MAGA and referred to the one who still complains about the election. If I were referring to you, I would have tagged you specifically.
Click to expand...
Ahh…..you responded to a post that clearly was about me. I do find you games fun. I am in. It’s all good. Let’s keep playing.
 
Extremists are more likely to be violent. Luckily, there are far more self identified moderates in the Democratic base than the Republican base.
 
Well, I was hoping what I wrote in quotes would have made who I was referring to, since I wrote "they stole the election from me!" which would apply to the person whom the election was stolen from versus "they stole the election from us!" The devil is always in the details.
 
You are being intellectually dishonest. We know for a fact that the claims they were eating people’s pets were a complete fabrication.
 
You “assumed”. Of course you did. Yet you cannot offer any actual evidence to back up your assumptions. I find that pathetic
 
TamleeB said:
Ahh…..you responded to a post that clearly was about me. I do find you games fun. I am in. It’s all good. Let’s keep playing.
Click to expand...
The ego is a powerful drug, one so powerful it didn't allow you to discern what I was saying and instead made you ignore what I wrote. But sure, let's keep playing. I'll dig a ditch, and you can jump into it.
 
As I said, you are incapable of publicly crossing either Donald nor his fellow soldiers. And that's okay. If Ted Cruz couldn't do it, well, he's a tough US Senator, and you're just a foot soldier for Donald. You're certainly not going to cross him.

Anyhow, Donald will be promulgating another lie shortly, so you'd best go and get prepared to run air cover for him. Remember, if the media hasn't issued you talking points when it happens, it's always safe to deflect to Joe Biden.
 
Some far right groups have been screeching for civil war for, well, as long as I can remember
 
ALiberalModerate said:
You are being intellectually dishonest. We know for a fact that the claims they were eating people’s pets were a complete fabrication.
Click to expand...
And? I was being referred to as someone who claimed that. I didn’t make that claim. So if you have a problem with false claims I suggest you take it up with the actual person who made the claim. So….NO I am not in anyway being intellectually dishonest.
 
ALiberalModerate said:
You are being intellectually dishonest. We know for a fact that the claims they were eating people’s pets were a complete fabrication.
Click to expand...
@TamleeB is not permitted to believe that the claims were a complete fabrication because that would be an expression of disloyalty to Donald Trump made right here in public, in front of numerous other MAGA who are watching. That takes courage. There are only a handful of actual conservatives on this site with that kind of courage. She sadly is not one of them.
 
I am fine with your assertion, as incorrect as it is. I have disagreed with Trump many times. I will never sell my soul to ANY politician. Perhaps in time, you find a way to do the same.
 
Seems your reading comprehension is not all that good
Because that is most definitely not a license to kill protesters.
 
How odd that you keep referencing me. If I didn’t know better I would think you might be craving attention. At this point I do find your post very humorous. You are so dishonest I can’t even be sure that what you are telling me are lies.
 
Deuce said:
Some far right groups have been screeching for civil war for, well, as long as I can remember
Click to expand...
This is not exclusive to the right.

To the point of the article this thread is based on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.