• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Socialists turn to weather gods to create world communism

ataraxia said:
Every single scientific organization, not just in the US, but on the entire planet, from Australia and Japan to Germany and England and S, Africa, have supported AGW. There is not ONE which has questioned it.

Creationism has not enjoyed similar support.
Click to expand...

You left the section before that out.

Rob Larrikin said:
Most scientists can’t speak out because they work for organizations that need the money they receive from government grants, and they would lose their jobs if they put that money at risk. Greenies like to brag about how NASA support the AGW myth, but again, they receive a lot of government money as a result. Here are 49 retired NASA scientists (who have nothing to lose) who debunk AGW:

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/nasa-scientists-dispute-climate-change-2012-4?r=US&IR=T
Click to expand...
 
Rob Larrikin said:
You left the section before that out.
Click to expand...

That doesn't explain why scientists at Exxon and other fossil fuel companies would support it too.

You can find handfuls of kooky or charlatan scientist who will support anything. For decades, there were a few who also fought the link between smoking and cancer too. Here is one who thanks the government is suppressing the evidence on UFO abductions, get cryin' out loud.

https://www.amazon.com/Abduction-Encounters-Aliens-John-Mack/dp/1416575804
 
Rob Larrikin said:
You’re thinking vertically. You need to think laterally. When you apply Marxism to any State you end up with the same thing you had in the USSR. You are too fixated on the label and the recipe, and not the results. Give that recipe to anyone and they end up with the same bad meal.



He’s the Marxist you get when you dial a Marxist. You complain about bourgeoisie capitalist take-out restaurants, right? You criticize them for advertising big juicy hamburgers but providing small, flat, dry buns with a thin slice of beef mince. Your chest swells with pride when you find this ‘invincible evidence’ that capitalism is corrupt. Yet when Marxism advertises supermen and delivers you Stalin, you forgive them and blubber, “Oh, this Stalin; that’s not really about Marxism. That was a mistake.” Now when the MacDonald's lady gives you a crappy hamburger you don’t make that excuse. If so you would say, “Oh, this isn’t REALLY a MacDonald’s hamburger. It’s a mistake.”

So no, Stalin isn't a mistake, and nor was the mass murderer Mao. They are both exactly what you get when you order a plate of Marxism.
Click to expand...

Conveniently ignoring the communist leaders who didn't commit mass murder, and ignoring the capitalist leaders who did.
 
ataraxia said:
That doesn't explain why scientists at Exxon and other fossil fuel companies would support it too.
Click to expand...
Exxon is put under pressure by both government and shareholders to go with the green consensus. In reality they believe AGW is a myth, and were happily funding anti-AGW scientists for years, until their shareholders made them stop. Even then, though they promised to stop, they continued.

https://www.theguardian.com/environ...mobil-gave-millions-climate-denying-lawmakers

As for others you mention, similar things happen. Governments bully them to accept the AGW myth. If they say no, governments can withdraw their drilling licenses using a plethora of environmental excuses. A fossil fuel company arguing with governments about AGW myths is like a chicken arguing with a skulk of foxes in the hen house.

By the way, I found that info in about ten seconds by doing a search in Bing. You should research your beliefs before putting them out there.
 
Aristaeus said:
Conveniently ignoring the communist leaders who didn't commit mass murder, and ignoring the capitalist leaders who did.
Click to expand...

Which capitalist leaders killed as many as the hundreds of millions killed by Stalin, Mao and NK?
 
Rob Larrikin said:
Which capitalist leaders killed as many as the hundreds of millions killed by Stalin, Mao and NK?
Click to expand...

That wasn't my point. There are communist leaders who weren't mass murderers and there are capitalist leaders who were.

If you want numbers, capitalism has killed more people than communism in total.
 
Last edited:
iguanaman said:
Hurricanes are nothing but heat engines. The warmer the water the more fuel they have. It is hard to deny that warmer oceans will not bring bigger and stronger storms but I'm sure you will try.
Click to expand...

Your Fake News won't change history. There were plenty of hurricanes just like this, and there will be plenty more. It's good old nature, and we have nothing to do with it.
 
Rob Larrikin said:
Garbage. Capitalism has saved billions of lives. Communism has killed hundreds of millions. There is no comparison.
Click to expand...

It's estimated that capitalism has resulted in the deaths of over 1 billion people. Just one example is the Bengal famine which cost over 2 million lives. Food was denied to the starving millions because it would have effected crop prices and hence profits.
 
Aristaeus said:
It's estimated that capitalism has resulted in the deaths of over 1 billion people. Just one example is the Bengal famine which cost over 2 million lives. Food was denied to the starving millions because it would have effected crop prices and hence profits.
Click to expand...

HAH AH HA HA HAAH HAAGHH. ROFLMAO.

So pick any group you like that die of famine, and then say, "Well, if [X] had sent them money or food, they would not have died. So it's [X's] fault."

That's not how business works. Your 'billion' dead is a giant fantasy Marxists have as they sit sipping champagne as people outside die of starvation.
 
Rob Larrikin said:
HAH AH HA HA HAAH HAAGHH. ROFLMAO.

So pick any group you like that die of famine, and then say, "Well, if [X] had sent them money or food, they would not have died. So it's [X's] fault."

That's not how business works. Your 'billion' dead is a giant fantasy Marxists have as they sit sipping champagne as people outside die of starvation.
Click to expand...

Well if we're excluding famine from the death tolls of regimes, then you have to knock many, many millions from Stalin's death toll.

Maybe you don't know the context behind the Bengal famine. Millions of people were starving to death. There was enough food in the region to feed them, but it was locked up in warehouses waiting to be exported to Britain and other countries. There was literally millions of people dying outside of warehouses full of food - food grown in the region, but they were denied that food because it would have hurt the profits of the export companies.
 
Aristaeus said:
It's estimated that capitalism has resulted in the deaths of over 1 billion people. Just one example is the Bengal famine which cost over 2 million lives. Food was denied to the starving millions because it would have effected crop prices and hence profits.
Click to expand...

Evidence?
 
Rob Larrikin said:
All he has is old wives' tales.
Click to expand...

Are you saying the Bengal famine didn't happen?? Are you reduced to denying historic events ever took place if it doesn't suit your arguments?
 
Aristaeus said:
Are you saying the Bengal famine didn't happen?? Are you reduced to denying historic events ever took place if it doesn't suit your arguments?
Click to expand...

Why don't you explain why how the Bengal famine can be blamed on 'capitalism', in more than just a few words?
 
Rob Larrikin said:
Why don't you explain why how the Bengal famine can be blamed on 'capitalism', in more than just a few words?
Click to expand...

I've already explained it was allowed to happen in order to preserve profits for private businesses.
 
Rob Larrikin said:
It's clear you don't know anything about it, or you'd explain.
Click to expand...

I've already explained twice. Not my fault if you can't grasp basic politcal theory.
 
Rob Larrikin said:
Though the anthropogenic (man-made) global warming myth has been disproved and debunked by thousands of climate scientists around the world, Socialists have kept it alive with their token pseudo-science, misinformation and Fake News, to take money from wealthy capitalist nations and give it to communists, under the guise of “Policing Emissions”.

The use of Weather Gods was a cunning move by communists. Such religions have been popular for millennia. Humans worshiped thunder gods, lightning gods, rain gods, wind gods and storm gods. There are far too many documented weather gods to list here, and then there are the hundreds of thousands we have no records of.

Humans always blamed themselves for the weather and still do. Even today, millions of farmers around the world pray for rain. If it doesn’t come they assume it’s because they must have displeased God. When the weather comes good they assume they pleased God with their good deeds. They think God only operates for their family. Humans seem to have an instinct for this. We just can’t help blaming ourselves for the weather.

So it made sense to the commies in the United Nations that creating another weather-based religion would enable them to build a new ‘climate change’ political movement. Humans would line up to sacrifice their money to this new god, called “Global Warming”.
Click to expand...


So the globalist capitalists are nervous.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom