• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

So, what's next after "Obamagate"?

Mycroft said:
Sorry, but your choice not to gain information and knowledge does not mean the facts do not exist.
Click to expand...

They do not exist. Ho hum.....just a nothingburger
 
Mycroft said:
You do know that Obamagate has nothing to do with a birth certificate...right?

Anyway, you seriously need to let that birth certificate thing go. it's been over for years.
Click to expand...

It's all the same crap. You get rid of one and Trump will just pull another one right out of his butt. I am sure he has a few more in there where those came from.

You're the one who just needs to let the whole thing go.
 
Puigb said:
Well, it's obvious already "Obamagate" is dead in the water, and probably not going anywhere (then again, I suspect a potential "investigation" of Biden by Trump's DOJ in October), so what's next? Both sexual assault allegations against Biden were such a joke to the point where even Trump himself barely acknowledged them, and "Obamagate" is a joke that most Republicans don't even want to touch, so what's next? I'm sure we will hear something in the next week or two, maybe even another Hillary Clinton "scandal" to really rile up the rubes.
Click to expand...

The idiots here seem to be back on the Biden Ukraine train .
 
Athanasius68 said:
The Flynn investigation was a subset of the larger investigation into Mr. Trump had conspired with Russia to fix the 2016 election.
We now know the FBI had no evidence to think Flynn was involved in any conspiracy.
We also now know that the Obama DOJ and DNI folks saw no evidence that a conspiracy ever actually existed.
Yet we know an investigation had occurred.
Click to expand...

Truthfully we now know exactly the opposite!!!
 
code1211 said:
Stay tuned.

The show has only begun.
Click to expand...

Well, to be fair, this is the longest roll out of a "show" I have ever "stayed tuned" for.
Like years long. When is someone, not in Trump's orbit getting indicted?
I am tired of wait and see and stay tuned.
 
Mycroft said:
A judge's opinion can send you to jail.
Click to expand...

Not this judges opinion about this.


She can cry about it over a beer with a bartender if she wants



It's a nothing burger
 
vegas giants said:
Not this judges opinion about this.


She can cry about it over a beer with a bartender if she wants



It's a nothing burger
Click to expand...

You STILL don't know what this is all about, do you?

Oh well...
 
Jezcoe said:
Or.... Flynn was a National Security Risk and the President should have listened to Obama and Chris Christie when they said not to hire him.

Think of all the trouble it would have saved the President.

Looks like they were trying to do Trump a solid.
Click to expand...

People conveniently forget Chris Christie (I mean I get it), was part of the vetting team for the new Admin and even he was like, nope don't hire him.
So, is Christie part of the conspiracy too? Did Obama make Hurricane Sandy hit NJ like a neutron bomb so he could then extort Christie? Did he tell him no federal funding until he joined team "**** Trump"? Was Christie a mole?
I am hearing people say it is so.
 
vegas giants said:
So you agree its a big nothing burger



I knew you could get there. Lol
Click to expand...

Why on earth would I agree with someone who has no idea what he's talking about?

Hey...are you interested in a hypothetical situation?
 
Mycroft said:
Why on earth would I agree with someone who has no idea what he's talking about?

Hey...are you interested in a hypothetical situation?
Click to expand...

No I'm not.


Obamagate is a made up nothing burger


It's just red meat for the trumpers
 
Mycroft said:
Why on earth would I agree with someone who has no idea what he's talking about?

Hey...are you interested in a hypothetical situation?
Click to expand...

Until you can show us that Obamagate is not just birtherism 2.0, we're going to have to be skeptical.

The only reason you're not is because of just a sheer WILL TO BELIEVE. There is simply no other basis to keep believing someone who comes up with wild crazy stuff every other day.
 
ataraxia said:
Until you can show us that Obamagate is not just birtherism 2.0, we're going to have to be skeptical.

The only reason you're not is because of just a sheer WILL TO BELIEVE. There is simply no other basis to keep believing someone who comes up with wild crazy stuff every other day.
Click to expand...

Are YOU interested in a hypothetical situation?

One about Trump?
 
bubbabgone said:
Yeah I had heard that but you said "Trump walks in on under age girls in their dressing rooms".
How long ago did he do that?
Click to expand...

Does it matter? I mean seriously Trump does stuff that makes Creepy Joe look like a saint.
And we know of these things from his own big mouth. I find it super creepy how much glee was in his voice about walking in on those girls.
But defend it anyway.
Neither of these men wins the prize for being a great human.
 
Mycroft said:
I don't need someone to complain about Biden to see his disgusting public actions.
Click to expand...

I promise to give as much credence to Biden's peccadillos as you do Trump's. Seems only fair.
If you are A-Okay with the way Trump reminisced on Stern about walking in on underage girls while they were dressing. Or his fondness of his daughter, well, then I don't really care what you think of Biden. Or anyone else for that matter.
 
bubbabgone said:
Perks of the job, I guess.
Abuse of power, you might call it.
You probably can't say the all abuse of power is the same I guess.
Something like a President misusing his intel agencies for political purposes.
You'd consider that worse, right?
Click to expand...

Keep moving the goal posts, djt is a pig and has always been one. What is the point you are trying to make?
 
Next? What could top one administration trying to sabotage the political campaign of the opposition party and then the presidency of that party after they won? The left knows they can't defend this so they act as if it didn't happen when the evidence is now overwhelming that it did. Yet, they keep chasing after Russian collusion, something all their own people privately admitted never happened. Amazing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom