• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

So what will the SCOTUS so on the 5th?

And you, instead of doing a quick google to learn what I have learned, choose to stay ignorant of the matte so as to not infect you with the remotest thought there is any facet to this case that might make you start to wonder what's the deal with BO...

Translation -- "I don't have credible evidence to back up my claims, and I know I'll be riduculed if I cite to the bizzaro websites where I read it, so I'll lamely try to put the burden on you to prove something I claimed instead."

Classic Go5 tactic. As if others should waste their time trying to look up BS assertions they make.
 
Last edited:
Most of us have moved beyond skin color, you should join us int he 21st century and try it.

Did I say anything about skin color?

You really DON'T know what the issue is here, do you? :roll:
 
Did I say anything about skin color?

You really DON'T know what the issue is here, do you? :roll:

Oh so now you were NOT playing the race card... sucks to get caught isn't it?

So what is at stake? The Constitution if the hatters are right, Obama's pride if they are wrong...

And many of you worry about his pride...

SCARY
 
Oh so now you were NOT playing the race card... sucks to get caught isn't it?QUOTE]

Show me where I said anything about race.

What "sucks" is that you don't really know what the issue here is. :mrgreen:
 
Oh so now you were NOT playing the race card... sucks to get caught isn't it?
So what is at stake? The Constitution if the hatters are right, Obama's pride if they are wrong...
And many of you worry about his pride...
SCARY
Just an fyi, this particular case that's the subject of the thread, assumes Obama was born in Hawaii and that there's not anything funny or amiss about his birth certificate.This case is not interested in Obama's birth certificate at all.
Just an fyi
 
This presents a good opportunity to Arnold Schwarzenegger to run for president in 2012, knowing that nobody can demand to see his birth certificate or challenge his citizenship.
 
This presents a good opportunity to Arnold Schwarzenegger to run for president in 2012, knowing that nobody can demand to see his birth certificate or challenge his citizenship.

A person or entity with standing would.
 
A person or entity with standing would.

Funny. Here in America, I thought all men had standing when it comes to their government. Typical of a liberal to denounce the basic idealogies of our republic when it's convenient to their causes.
 
Funny. Here in America, I thought all men had standing when it comes to their government.

They do not. Just because you're a taxpayer doesn't give you the right to sue the government for waste, for example.

Typical of a liberal to denounce the basic idealogies of our republic when it's convenient to their causes.

Assuming you were talking about me, what basic ideologies of our republic did I denounce? Got your panties in a knot? All I stated was a fact. I didn't even state an opinion whether I thought it was right or wrong.

Sheesh. And you say I'm the blind partisan.
 
Just an fyi, this particular case that's the subject of the thread, assumes Obama was born in Hawaii and that there's not anything funny or amiss about his birth certificate.This case is not interested in Obama's birth certificate at all.
Just an fyi

I know what's up, adk implied the real reason was... so I tagged her for implied racism now her panties are all bunched up.
 
I know what's up, adk implied the real reason was... so I tagged her for implied racism now her panties are all bunched up.

No you don't. In fact, I'm convinced you don't know much about anything. You argue yourself in circles all the time. No wonder you didn't go anywhere in the Navy.

Show me where I said anything about this being about race. Come on big boy. Where's your proof?

Tell us what this case is really about. Hint: It is not about his birth certificate.

Get your head out of the clouds. You know, the clouds are those big fluffy things up in the air that seem to be blinding your sight. Or, is it just your reading comprehension that "sucks"?
 
What do I refer too? Why it's D-DAY for the "Obama is not a natural born US Citizen!" folks.

Personally, I just cannot imagine that he made it to this point, and is NOT in fact a natural born American. It boggles the mind that he could go so far without some proof that he was born elsewhere.

HOWEVER, that's not the discussion I wish to get into. Let's discuss this not on the issue of Obama's actual citizenship, but on how the SCOTUS will act on the issue.

The most likely outcome is that they find some reason to ignore it. If they take up the case, they look petty, if they do not... well the media isn't gonna rake them over the coals.

Personally, if I were on the Court, I'd just say "You will provide the document in question. Period." If Obama refused I'd then do everything the Court can to make his life hell. It's one thing to be stubborn, it's another to carry it on to this level.

However, should his BC come out through this method, I think it would weaken him a little. The flipside being, enough all ready, why WON'T he release it. It's the fact he refuses to that irks me.

I don't think anything will come of it. After all, nobody seemed bothered that McCain wasn't a natural born citizen either.
 
Because you are.

LMAO!

What a surprise coming from the guy who writes, "liberals are genetically predisposed to being thuggish assholes without an ounce of dignity or class between the lot of them,"

With that demonstrated objectivity, your opinion can be given the weight deserved.

But why didn't you defend your assertion? "Assuming you were talking about me, what basic ideologies of our republic did I denounce?"

Just spouting nonsense without any basis? That seems probable for you, but you can show I'm wrong here.
 
Last edited:
His birth certificate is not the issue. :roll: You DO know what thee issue is... don't you? Oi vey! :roll:

Here you go. You didn't answer this yourself, you implied something. So I filled in the obvious blank you left hanging. The fact you are so worked up you are now resorting to personal attacks and insults means... yeah I was dead on.

Or you COULD correct me and say "No, I didn't mean race, I meant XXX durr" That you have not says as much as BO no releasing his BC in the first place.
 
SCOTUS?! Isn't that your testicles? By the way....


Moderator's Warning:


There's some jerkyness brewing. Be cool.
 
Last edited:
But why didn't you defend your assertion? "Assuming you were talking about me, what basic ideologies of our republic did I denounce?"

I did. It's just that you're so blindly partisan that you couldn't see it.
 
Another fine example of the "b-b-b-but what about the evil right" stupidity we hear all the time. Idiotic as the day is long.

Pointing out that there are idiots on both sides of the political spectrum is idiotic? :shock:
 
Here you go. You didn't answer this yourself, you implied something. So I filled in the obvious blank you left hanging. The fact you are so worked up you are now resorting to personal attacks and insults means... yeah I was dead on.

Or you COULD correct me and say "No, I didn't mean race, I meant XXX durr" That you have not says as much as BO no releasing his BC in the first place.

The "obvious blank"? :rofl You are the queen of assumptions. Do you think it strange that you're the only one who thought that thought was "obvious"?

I "asked" the question. "YOU" accused me of insinuating I was talking about race. YOU inserted the race card here, nobody else. YOU started with the personal attacks, as always because ... well... that's what YOU do when you've been BUSTED. :2wave:

And you STILL haven't answered the question.

What is this really about?
 
The "obvious blank"? :rofl You are the queen of assumptions. Do you think it strange that you're the only one who thought that thought was "obvious"?

I "asked" the question. "YOU" accused me of insinuating I was talking about race. YOU inserted the race card here, nobody else. YOU started with the personal attacks, as always because ... well... that's what YOU do when you've been BUSTED. :2wave:

And you STILL haven't answered the question.

What is this really about?

The Constitution. Dur. I never attacked you.
 
Pointing out that there are idiots on both sides of the political spectrum is idiotic? :shock:

No, trying to mitigate the idiocy of one side by pointing out the idiocy of the other is idiotic. Don't play the fool. It's unbecoming.
 
I did. It's just that you're so blindly partisan that you couldn't see it.

What's the matter, upset you didn't make the gang of five list?

Keep working on it. You're almost there.
 
Back
Top Bottom