- Joined
- Nov 14, 2009
- Messages
- 27,066
- Reaction score
- 24,709
- Location
- Rocky Mtn. High
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
You are comparing the polling difference between Trump and Clinton in 2016 to the difference the Harris/Trump polling difference today remarking that Clinton was way ahead and then Trump won. Certainly an interesting assertion, but there are two problems with that analysis:That is possible.
So you claim.
I attribute the enthusiasm to how horribly bad a candidate Biden was.
Note that they still propped him up
There was a pandemic.
Not similar at all.
Yata, yata.
Trump never had a lead in either 2016 or 2020. He does now.
It's my degree field.
I keep up.
- As I stated previously, the polls are shifting fast. Taking a benchmark today is a bit dangerous because today's numbers are not likely the real numbers. Harris' real number, today, is likely stronger than reflected in polls produced today, but researched 2 to 5 days ago. A perfect example of the shift -- in a Marist poll released this evening, there was a pronounced shift in Independents. Harris is now up 9 points among so-called Independents vs being down by 14 points two weeks ago. https://www.nj.com/news/2024/08/in-new-marist-poll-harris-makes-astronomical-move-on-trump.html
- If you look that the Clinton/Trump polling (see cite below), you will see that the sum of their support was generally around 90% (some of the August 2016 polls, the aggregate Clinton/Trump number was closer to 80%). This meant that 10% of the vote was unaccounted for --- there was far more upside for each candidate in 2016 than is reflected in the current polling that has the sum of Trump and Harris support at 97-98%. There are no undecideds to be had by either candidate in 2024. Moreover, many polls are now showing Harris in the low 50's in support, which makes this even more difficult for Trump.

2016 General Election: Trump vs. Clinton | RealClearPolling
2016 General Election: Trump vs. Clinton | RealClearPolling
Granted, election polls are a combination of candidate preference and turnout model. When these polls bust, its usually a bust in the turnout model. The thing pollsters struggle the most often with is the turnout of younger voters. I submit the excitement of the Harris candidacy, particularly because she represents a new generation of POTUS candidate, will mean higher younger voter turnout.... is this baked into the numbers?
Last edited: