• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

So, Kamala own a Glock

JMB1911A1

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2022
Messages
14,207
Reaction score
10,131
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Private
Too bad that the state of CA regards all Glocks as “unsafe” weapons. In fact, only Gen 3 Glocks are legal to own in CA since they are grandfathered in.


“"Note that California law classifies ALL Glocks as 'unsafe handguns' because they do not have a compliant chamber load indicator, lack a magazine disconnect mechanism, and until our lawsuit caused California to repeal the requirement, of course lacked microstamping," Kostas Moros, an attorney with Michel & Associates representing the California Rifle & Pistol Association, posted on X.​
"The only reason we can still buy Gen 3s is because they are grandfathered in, but they are still 'unsafe handguns,'" Moros continued. "We can't buy more modern Glocks new in gun stores (just secondhand from exempt cops, or from those who moved here with them from other states). She supported the Unsafe Handgun Act and expanded it such that microstamping began to be enforced in 2013. So why does she own an 'unsafe handgun'?"”​

I wonder if she bought it before or after she supported the 2005 Proposition H that banned all handguns in San Francisco?


Guns for me but not for thee. Some pigs are more equal than other in CA.

Maybe she has a Glock “giggle switch” to go with her cackle? (BTW, that last comment was sarcasm for our gun control brethren)
 
Too bad that the state of CA regards all Glocks as “unsafe” weapons. In fact, only Gen 3 Glocks are legal to own in CA since they are grandfathered in.


“"Note that California law classifies ALL Glocks as 'unsafe handguns' because they do not have a compliant chamber load indicator, lack a magazine disconnect mechanism, and until our lawsuit caused California to repeal the requirement, of course lacked microstamping," Kostas Moros, an attorney with Michel & Associates representing the California Rifle & Pistol Association, posted on X.​
"The only reason we can still buy Gen 3s is because they are grandfathered in, but they are still 'unsafe handguns,'" Moros continued. "We can't buy more modern Glocks new in gun stores (just secondhand from exempt cops, or from those who moved here with them from other states). She supported the Unsafe Handgun Act and expanded it such that microstamping began to be enforced in 2013. So why does she own an 'unsafe handgun'?"”​

I wonder if she bought it before or after she supported the 2005 Proposition H that banned all handguns in San Francisco?


Guns for me but not for thee. Some pigs are more equal than other in CA.

Maybe she has a Glock “giggle switch” to go with her cackle? (BTW, that last comment was sarcasm for our gun control brethren)
She probably doesn't know a thing about her gun and I doubt she has ever handled or fired it.
 
This weird belief that only people in the Gun Cult own firearms is bizarre.
Well, Mycroft probably doesn't know a thing about guns and I doubt he has ever handled or fired one (he couldn't even find incontrovertible evidence of 2020 electoral fraud, much less be proficient with firearms) so I would view any of his comments on Harris's gun proficiency with a grain of salt.
 
This weird belief that only people in the Gun Cult own firearms is bizarre.
That may be, but I'm not in the "Gun Cult".

Anyway, do you disagree with what I said? If so...why?
 
If Kamala had indeed said she doesn't want to see hand guns banned, that's disappointing.
 
I would imagine that a candidate being a gun owner would be encouraging for someone who feels strongly about the 2nd amendment.

Clearly it's more complicated than that.

Trumps also owns a gun, though the photos I see have him holding long arms, mostly antiques. Does that demonstrate support for the 2nd better somehow?

How much range time with what firearms does a candidate need before they are acceptable?
 
I would imagine that a candidate being a gun owner would be encouraging for someone who feels strongly about the 2nd amendment.

Clearly it's more complicated than that.

Trumps also owns a gun, though the photos I see have him holding long arms, mostly antiques. Does that demonstrate support for the 2nd better somehow?

How much range time with what firearms does a candidate need before they are acceptable?

Kamala is still a WAY better choice than the Orange clown though.
 
I would imagine that a candidate being a gun owner would be encouraging for someone who feels strongly about the 2nd amendment.

Clearly it's more complicated than that.

Trumps also owns a gun, though the photos I see have him holding long arms, mostly antiques. Does that demonstrate support for the 2nd better somehow?

How much range time with what firearms does a candidate need before they are acceptable?
B level USPSA shooter. I wanna see trophies. :alien:
 
I would imagine that a candidate being a gun owner would be encouraging for someone who feels strongly about the 2nd amendment.

I have little doubt that the only reason she owns a gun is so she can say she's a gun owner for political purposes.
 
I have little doubt that the only reason she owns a gun is so she can say she's a gun owner for political purposes.
I suspect that when she was SF DA, she was advised to get a gun for protection. Of course, she pushed for the little people in SF to be disarmed via Prop H. Now, it is just a political prop like Walz’s fudd shotgun

Heck, Gabby Giffords was photographed shooting ARs that she now wants to ban for the little people.

Some animals are more equal than others.
 
It really does look like he got into an old bottle of iodine and just spread it on with a cotton swab.
Betadine. But enough on the rabbit hole.

Back to the topic at hand. I wonder if Kamala got her Glock from Cornpop and is it a “fordy”?
 
Why? Why do they have to declare they are “gun owners” like it is some magical talisman?

We know their attitudes towards the RKBA by their actions over the last 20 years. Saying they are “gun owners” is just political pandering, pure and simple.

Those of us that support the 2A are not fooled unlike the simple minded sheep in the MSM that trumpet her statements.
 
Betadine. But enough on the rabbit hole.

Back to the topic at hand. I wonder if Kamala got her Glock from Cornpop and is it a “fordy”?

I am going to presume that as having been a law enforcement official for the majority of her professional career, she would own a legal firearm. Even if it is grandfathered in.
 
Betadine. But enough on the rabbit hole.

Back to the topic at hand. I wonder if Kamala got her Glock from Cornpop and is it a “fordy”?

I tried Glocks when I was shopping, years ago. "Highly recommended" by many I knew.

Didnt fit my hand tho, so I went with SW M&P. I cannot believe the Glocks dont have a chamber load indicator. How do you tell if you have one in the chamber? That seems like BS to me, I wouldnt buy that. And what's a "magazine disconnect mechanism?" If that isnt something you press to drop the magazine, what is it?

☮️ 🇺🇸 ☮️
 
I tried Glocks when I was shopping, years ago. "Highly recommended" by many I knew.

Didnt fit my hand tho, so I went with SW M&P. I cannot believe the Glocks dont have a chamber load indicator. How do you tell if you have one in the chamber? That seems like BS to me, I wouldnt buy that. And what's a "magazine disconnect mechanism?" If that isnt something you press to drop the magazine, what is it?

☮️ 🇺🇸 ☮️
If there is no magazine in the firearm, it will not fire.
 
Back
Top Bottom