Shepard Smith, a Fox News reporter, said something to the effect that no US president before Trump has made such bellicose statements regarding world affairs in reference to President Trump’s “fire and fury” comments on North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un. Smith’s words mirror the indignation of much of the left.
Apparently Shep forgot about JFK saying that any missile launched from Cuba against the United States will be regarded as an attack on the US by the Soviet Union requiring a full retaliatory response by the US on the Soviet Union. Remember the Cuban Missile Crisis? Those of us who were alive at the time were glad Kennedy took a stand in 1962 when Fidel Castro was rattling the saber of Soviet missiles.
Kennedy stood his ground, the Soviets backed down and the missiles were removed from Cuban soil just 90 miles from our shores. We were also thankful that the Soviets did not give Castro the secret of the atom allowing him to build his own nuclear arsenal.
The only thing that has really changed today is the spreading “snowflake” mindset of the American population. If you say what you mean and mean what you say as a leader, indoctrinated snowflakes are enraged that you are committing micro-aggressions that offend the world at large. It’s abundantly clear that basic survival instincts are being “re-educated” out of much of the American population.
The kids in college today are no different than we were. But they’re getting shafted because they are just Sputnik-inspired cash cows brainwashed with all sorts of idiosyncratic culture-bending glorified Tupperware seminars in the guise of manufactured societal struggles-men against women, gays against heterosexuals, whites against blacks, rich against poor, old against young-you name it.
Most survive and come to their senses but snowflakes are problematic. They have no perception of the power of the atom and the evil of those who seek it. They have an almost Pavlovian attachment to fairness and feelings. They have no grasp of actual history where the appeasement policies of Clinton, Bush and Obama have lead us to the brink of a nuclear catastrophe on the wings of shady diplomacy and a distorted Neville-Chamberlain-like “understanding” of those who want to destroy us.
A properly nurtured snowflake is likely to see the president as more of a threat than Kim Jong-Un. When you can’t make sense of the world you’re toast.
If you say what you mean and mean what you say as a leader, indoctrinated snowflakes are enraged that you are committing micro-aggressions that offend the world at large. It’s abundantly clear that basic survival instincts are being “re-educated” out of much of the American population.
The History Place - Great Speeches Collection: JFK on the Cuban Missile Crisis
It shall be the policy of this Nation to regard any nuclear missile launched from Cuba against any nation in the Western Hemisphere as an attack by the Soviet Union on the United States, requiring a full retaliatory response upon the Soviet Union.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/08/world/asia/north-korea-un-sanctions-nuclear-missile-united-nations.html
“North Korea best not make any more threats to the United States,”... “They will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen.”
While I understand that this post is just a continuation of butt hurt boomers pretending like their generation is God's gift to the world it is also important to point out that an attack and a threat are very different things.
Is there a difference between someone punching you and someone saying they are going to punch you?LOL
It's interesting to see how kids today view things.
Both are threats.
Might want to reconsider who is butt hurt.
It's not at all clear whether Trump says what he means and means what he says. It's not clear whether we, or even Kim Jung Un, should take Trump seriously or literally now. After all, when we were all scratching our heads over all the weird things that Trump said in his campaign, you guys were making fun of us saying that YOU knew what he really meant- because you took him seriously, and weren't wasting time trying to figure out exactly what he meant. Remember how he said he would build a wall and have Mexico pay for it? How he could repeal and replace healthcare his first day in office, and then everyone would have "beautiful" health insurance, and it would be "so easy"? How he would "bomb the sh-t out of ISIS"? How he would tear up the Iran nuclear deal? How he would impose tariffs on China? etc, etc...? Well, he hasn't done any of that. And you are OK with it. Because all those things apparently didn't mean what they sounded like. It was not meant to be taken literally. It was meant to mean something like "I am a great guy and I will do some things", or something like that.
Well, you got him elected, and now he is talking on the international stage, and the whole world is trying to figure out if they should take him seriously. It sounds like (if we are to take his words at face value), he just threatened N. Korea with nuclear war. But are we, or more importantly, is Kim Jung Un, supposed to know that Trump just says stuff out of his a$$ and is not to be taken literally? Are these some more "alternative facts"? No one knows, because apparently words don't matter anymore. So what IS Trump trying to say? Not only does Un need a translator, we other English speaker are also going to need your special translation services for ourselves trying to understand this new Trumpese language.
So yeah, we are on the brink of nuclear war, with a president whose language and speech no one can understand except some uneducated rural whites. Hey, what could go wrong?
Is there a difference between someone punching you and someone saying they are going to punch you?
Is there a difference between someone punching you and someone saying they are going to punch you?
Kennedy and Trump said the same thing. Mess with us and you will suffer the consequences. You seem confused by that. Perhaps it was the method by which the same message was delivered.
Neither of them said "mess with us and suffer the consequences". Kennedy said that if we are attacked we will retaliate. Trump said if they keep making threats we will retaliate. Those are very very different things particularly when we are talking about nuclear weapons.
Is there a difference between someone punching you and someone saying they are going to punch you?
Shepard Smith, a Fox News reporter, said something to the effect that no US president before Trump has made such bellicose statements regarding world affairs in reference to President Trump’s “fire and fury” comments on North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un. Smith’s words mirror the indignation of much of the left.
Apparently Shep forgot about JFK saying that any missile launched from Cuba against the United States will be regarded as an attack on the US by the Soviet Union requiring a full retaliatory response by the US on the Soviet Union. Remember the Cuban Missile Crisis? Those of us who were alive at the time were glad Kennedy took a stand in 1962 when Fidel Castro was rattling the saber of Soviet missiles.
Kennedy stood his ground, the Soviets backed down and the missiles were removed from Cuban soil just 90 miles from our shores. We were also thankful that the Soviets did not give Castro the secret of the atom allowing him to build his own nuclear arsenal.
The only thing that has really changed today is the spreading “snowflake” mindset of the American population. If you say what you mean and mean what you say as a leader, indoctrinated snowflakes are enraged that you are committing micro-aggressions that offend the world at large. It’s abundantly clear that basic survival instincts are being “re-educated” out of much of the American population.
The kids in college today are no different than we were. But they’re getting shafted because they are just Sputnik-inspired cash cows brainwashed with all sorts of idiosyncratic culture-bending glorified Tupperware seminars in the guise of manufactured societal struggles-men against women, gays against heterosexuals, whites against blacks, rich against poor, old against young-you name it.
Most survive and come to their senses but snowflakes are problematic. They have no perception of the power of the atom and the evil of those who seek it. They have an almost Pavlovian attachment to fairness and feelings. They have no grasp of actual history where the appeasement policies of Clinton, Bush and Obama have lead us to the brink of a nuclear catastrophe on the wings of shady diplomacy and a distorted Neville-Chamberlain-like “understanding” of those who want to destroy us.
A properly nurtured snowflake is likely to see the president as more of a threat than Kim Jong-Un. When you can’t make sense of the world you’re toast.
The boomers are the millennials God-gifted generation to their everlasting benefit.
LOL
It's interesting to see how kids today view things.
Both are threats.
Might want to reconsider who is butt hurt.
NK said we are going to punch you, Trump said I'm gonna F you up if you do.
Does that make it easier to understand?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Neither of them said "mess with us and suffer the consequences". Kennedy said that if we are attacked we will retaliate. Trump said if they keep making threats we will retaliate. Those are very very different things particularly when we are talking about nuclear weapons.
On what basis did Kennedy risk nuclear war when he blockaded Cuba?
I spent my childhood under a desk at 10am on the last Friday of the month during the school year, listening to air raid sirens blaring through out the city. Signs like the one below were strategically placed through out the city.
View attachment 67221100
Threats come in many forms. Do you think the blockade was a threat?
Both Kennedy and President Trump said the same thing.
You appear to dislike the method President Trump used when echoing the same resolve Kennedy did.
How about you focus on responding to posts instead of trying to stretch everything so that you can feel right?
But if you don't look too closely at the actual wording, and you're desperate to defend an increasingly embarrassing president, you can walk away with the impression that they're basically the same thing, mostly. #AltFacts
LOL
Or if your desperate to embarrassingly attack everything the President says, you can walk away with the impressing a point made actually made sense.
The History Place - Great Speeches Collection: JFK on the Cuban Missile Crisis
It shall be the policy of this Nation to regard any nuclear missile launched from Cuba against any nation in the Western Hemisphere as an attack by the Soviet Union on the United States, requiring a full retaliatory response upon the Soviet Union.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/08/world/asia/north-korea-un-sanctions-nuclear-missile-united-nations.html
“North Korea best not make any more threats to the United States,”... “They will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen.”
While I understand that this post is just a continuation of butt hurt boomers pretending like their generation is God's gift to the world it is also important to point out that an attack and a threat are very different things.
NK said we are going to punch you, Trump said I'm gonna F you up if you do.
Does that make it easier to understand?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?