And, I am not sure how you reached your opinion, Government is social-ism and the social Power of eminent domain for the Public Good is sufficient Proof.
Socialism narrowly defined is the collective ownership of the means of production. In essence, it means nationalizing almost everything. In a broader sense, some people call themselves socialist in reference to the social democrat model of most European countries. That essentially means a large welfare state. There is nothing about
all government that is socialist. Public education programs, public health care programs, public employment programs, public unemployment insurance programs, government operator utilities, etc. all come with a socialist flavour. The army? No. Some libertarians have a bone to pick with a standing army, but most people tend to assume it is a necessary function of government: without the capacity to repel invaders, the government does not have the capacity to enforce the respect of individual rights. The argument could be and usually is extended to the police for similar reasons. As the Declaration of Independance clearly states, "governments are instuted among men to secure" the right to life, freedom and the pursuit of happiness.
And how did I form my opinion? Well, read John Locke. Then re-read the Declaration of Independance and the US Constitution. Once you do that, it will be unambiguously clear what they mean. Otherwise, there is also the pesky problem that welfare programs on a large scale are more or less a 20th century invention. You cannot read the Founding Fathers thinking they meant that Congress should forcibly levy taxes on the rich to take care of the poor, unless you read them with a degree of anachronism that buggles the mind.
Right wingers don't complain about the ethical implications of a warfare-State on a for-profit basis.
They're not a mass of ideologically homogeneous people. A lot of them actually do not like US foreign policy. It's very expansive and it's not like meddling into the politics of foreign countries has always been a success. I'm sure you're aware of the Carter administration and the human catastrophy that is the regime in Tehran. On the other hand, there absolutely are people working to undermine American interests and those of their allies. It's not like all countries can be expected to play fair and to respect their commitments. I would not count on people who stone their homosexuals and who call for religious wars over caricatures to behave themselves.
With that being said, the primary complaint I have heard on the right recently with foreign policy and warfare is the fact that America is always the one footing the bill worldwide. You all have every right to be a bit pissed and to ask Europe, Canada, Australia and other allies to chip in a bit more.
In the meantime, I'd say thank God for America.