Slowing economy complicates campaign messaging for Trump
I don't think many Americans have noticed a slowing economy if it even actually exists. Kinda a like the global warming hoax people don't care they just go about living their lives.
Slowing economy complicates campaign messaging for Trump | TheHill
President Trump is heading into the 2020 campaign with a resilient economy behind him and new trade deals under his belt, counting on both to help bolster his reelection odds.
But as Trump claims credit for extending the longest-ever stretch of U.S. economic prosperity, recent government figures show he is falling far short of his promise to accelerate the economy.
And global Trumpfluenza is not going to help the economy or him
No hurry. Just wait. Stocks are down, gold & silver are up. International trade is grinding down. Nothing to see here...yet
Unless there's a killer crash that's obvious to everyone, I doubt it will matter to Trump supporters. They don't pay attention to facts, the get their information from Trump & his media. And Trump and his media are telling them the economy has never been better.Slowing economy complicates campaign messaging for Trump | TheHill
President Trump is heading into the 2020 campaign with a resilient economy behind him and new trade deals under his belt, counting on both to help bolster his reelection odds.
But as Trump claims credit for extending the longest-ever stretch of U.S. economic prosperity, recent government figures show he is falling far short of his promise to accelerate the economy.
And global Trumpfluenza is not going to help either the economy or him
Are you building a global warming bunker? The temperature 20 ft down is a constant 50 degrees F or so. You could ride out climate change down there for decades.
Unless there's a killer crash that's obvious to everyone, I doubt it will matter to Trump supporters. They don't pay attention to facts, the get their information from Trump & his media. And Trump and his media are telling them the economy has never been better.
You know, I believe you are acting with good motive here. And it is giving me pause.I truly think it is counterproductive to keep insulting folks who support Trump. It probably makes some more entrenched in their thinking. It also allows for the disgrace that happened on CNN with Don Lemon. Did not see it but it seems he was laughing at insulting jokes.
Actions such as these probably makes many who don't consider themselves coastal elites oppose those arrogant enough to demean them.
You know, I believe you are acting with good motive here. And it is giving me pause.
But I do believe not all, but a great many of Trump's supporters do believe exactly as I described. You and I have discussion to the contrary, for instance on the state of the economy. But I can show you legions of Trump supporters posting on this forum that will attempt to portray the 2.3% GDP growth we currently enjoy as hyperbolicly being the "best of any President ever" or some other nonsense. And those thinking like that are not isolated or rare.
So I apologize if I inadvertently insulted you and other reasonably principled Trump supporters. I will move forward trying to be more cognizant and measured in my generalizations. But I know what I'm seeing in a great many Trump supporters, even if not applicable to all of them.
And to my original comment? I do believe barring an extreme crash, a great many Trump supporters will not recognize a legit economic downturn if Trump, the GOP, and the Trump-GOP media machine & surrogates fill their heads with hyperbole that reflects otherwise. I see too many regular examples to believe otherwise.
Anyway, I do thank you for your comment. I do appreciate it. Every now and then it is good to re-examine ourselves and our actions & positions, and I'm surely no exception.
Thanks!Thanks for the response. Just so you know I took no offense to your post. We have bantered back and forth enough that I think we respect each others opinions even (especially) when we don't agree.
I can respect this. I do admire that you are virtually always measured. That's a great quality.Does this president use wild statements more than most presidents? I would say yes. Are followers of this president more sheep like than followers of past presidents. Not sure I would agree with that one. The rise of social media and cable talk shows exasperate the differences IMHO.
I don't think many Americans have noticed a slowing economy if it even actually exists. Kinda a like the global warming hoax people don't care they just go about living their lives.
I wonder what would have happened to the economy if that Queen of the Trump haters...Pelosi...hadn't sat on the USMCA for a year?
I wonder what would have happened to the economy if the Fed had taken Trump's advice way back in 2017 and reduced interest rates?
I wonder what would have happened to the economy if the rest of the government had supported Trump?
The fact that Trump...in the face of constant opposition from the rest of the government...has managed to boost our economy as much as he has is undeniable evidence that he knows what he's doing...and what he wants to do.
His cult will consider that to be 3d chess.
Nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.
Keep talking like that and you will contribute to his reelection.
You're like most people in the media or the academia, so profoundly blinded by your personal dislike of his all too obvious flaws of character to recognize the man actually picked up legitimate concerns. While Democrats are busy chasing after a minority of radicals on the far left who dominate discussions in narrow online spaces, he's talking to Joe and Jane Average. During his State of the Union address, he used roughly the first 30 minutes to talk about good news for America: there have been exceptional gains of income made by low income and the middle class during his first three years in office, and major improvement in employment prospects for black people, hispanic people and women. He made references to history and the improvements America has made over time in how faithfully it implements the ideals of individual liberty and of the equality of all people in rights. He celebrated the efforts of black veterans prior to the 1970s, made on behalf of a nation which was still discriminating massively against them. He even promoted a veteran to the grade of general as symbolic gesture on behalf of the whole country...
Regardless of what you think of the man and regardless of how much you think he has to do with any of those things, those things should be considered to be excellent news and a unifying narrative. Guess who acted like absolute spoiled brats during the event? Democrats couldn't even get themselves to applaud good news for the little guys and little gals of the country, or to celebrate the message Donald Trump was delivering about making good on the promise embedded in the Declaration of Independance. Hell, even when he spoke up about a bi-partisan bill, it took everything for Democrats to cheer.
And, his followers are the ones enrolled in a cult. Get your head out of your a**. Most conservatives do not hail Donald Trump a some kind of political genius, let alone a moral examplar they would wish their kids emulate. What they actually say is forget the Twitter nonsense and look at the results. If from now until the election, Donald Trump would talk like he talked at the SOTU address and would stop insulting people on Twitter, he'd win his office with a massive landslide in November. It would be Reagan circa 1980 all over again, hands down. The figures are just too good and the Democrats are just too busy shooting in their own feet to do anything about it.
Don't like him if you want, but at the moment he's the only guy out there who's not an insane radical and who actually sides with ordinary people. That kind of slanted comment is exactly how he'll get reelected: people mostly from the left who hate him so much they end up looking like they're siding with elites at every step of the way.
I believe this is a fundamental misunderstanding on your part. The efficient market hypothesis in this case, is "full employment of resources in the market for labor" by solving for the deleterious capital effects of Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment in a market friendly manner and with existing legal and physical infrastructure.Nobody takes massivelty biased people like you seriously on economics. Nuance.
People on the right tend to exaggerate some things, but they rarely make the most absurd statements. For example, if you believe in the efficient market hypothesis, you would be demonstrably wrong.
If liberty and equality, as is thought by some, are chiefly to be found in democracy, they will be best attained when all persons alike share in government to the utmost.
Aristotle
I truly think it is counterproductive to keep insulting folks who support Trump. It probably makes some more entrenched in their thinking. It also allows for the disgrace that happened on CNN with Don Lemon. Did not see it but it seems he was laughing at insulting jokes.
Actions such as these probably makes many who don't consider themselves coastal elites oppose those arrogant enough to demean them.
I believe this is a fundamental misunderstanding on your part. The efficient market hypothesis in this case, is "full employment of resources in the market for labor" (...).
(...) by solving for the deleterious capital effects of Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment in a market friendly manner and with existing legal and physical infrastructure.
By providing recourse to unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States we can ensure capital circulates efficiently enough for a positive multiplier effect.
Increasing market participation is an increase in efficiency under capitalism because capital circulates more efficiently in a market economy under capitalism.
But on the other hand, I think many of these Trump supporters think that the fact that Trump can be so shockingly rude, boorish, shameless, and arrogant just proves his manhood, and the fact that no one is rude back to him just shows how much a p—-y these rivals are. Like a fifth grade schoolyard bully, these folks may not understand anything but a good solid punch in the nose.
I believe in object orientation in modern broadband times, don't you?There is only one thing we call the "efficient market hypothesis" and it refers specifically to the informational efficiency of financial markets. And I chose to use it to illustrate a point.
.
That is what I am referring to under our form of Capitalism. We can have a capital good conversation under Capitalism. Market participation under our form of Capitalism is usually a requirement for capital to be used under truer forms of Capitalism. We should have no Homeless problem with equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, at the equivalent to fourteen dollars an hour, with or without a fifteen dollar an hour statutory minimum wage.Capital refers to something specific in economics: we're talking about tools, machines, buildings, softwares, etc. I don't see that as having "deleterious effects." Outside of economics, capital means funds... again, I don't see that as having "deleterious effects."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?