Actually, the Trumpy lawyers' problem is that the judge didn't overlook anything. She took the whole thing very seriously. Very, very seriously.
She went through every claim in the original suit, and then she went through every claim they mounted to defend themselves against charges of incompetence & bad lawyering. And she crushed every single one — with barely restrained fury, but also with meticulous precision.
A few examples:
1) The Michigan lawsuit sought to have the election results set aside & Trump 'declared' the winner by the judge. Why? Because absentee ballots were counted that lacked postmarks!!! An ominous claim!!! Except Michigan voters can deliver their ballots in person. No postmark required.
2) Another ominous claim: Michigan voters who requested absentee ballots then voted in person!!! Except Michigan law specifically
allows voters who request an absentee ballot to come to the polls in person on election day and vote.
This is so vital: These 9 attorneys attempted to gas-light and lie right to the judge.
In their disciplinary hearing — after the suit was dismissed — Parker asked the lawyers about the specific instances of claims in the suit that were not violations of law. The lawyers either acknowledged they were wrong, claimed not to know the relevant law, or shrugged.
Read the judge's decision for yourself. The bottom of p. 55 through p. 58 is especially entertaining.