• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should the Trump administration release the Epstein files to prove Trump was not involved?

Should the Trump administration release the Epstein files to prove Trump was not involved?

  • Yes, the Trump administration should release the files.

  • No, the Trump administration should not release the files


Results are only viewable after voting.
Is this a trick question? It's been a known fact for years trumpdump shared young girls with this bromance dude he had back then, come on FFS. Whether the "files" support it is almost a moot point. Magats support a degenerate lying criminal. Period.
If he didn't have big money, power, and mafia lawyers he would have been in prison a long long time ago. He never would have been president. He raped a 14yo girl.
 
If the files proved he WAS involved, why didn't the Biden administration release them?
Because Biden is not like that. There are a lot of things Biden could have done if he played dirty; but Biden is a good guy. A man of character.
 
They can’t do that, they don’t have control over the files right now (all they control at the moment is the secrecy stamp). If they succeed in gaining control of the documents themselves, they will sort out everything about Trump and pretend it never existed. The problem is that other prosecutorial offices besides SDNY may have copies lying around, so it won’t be entirely easy. But until they have control of SDNY, the files will likely remain untouched and sealed.

Trump already tried during his last term to seize control of SDNY, mainly by attempting to fire its chief, Geoffrey Berman, and replace him. Berman refused to resign voluntarily. After legal chaos, he finally stepped down only once his deputy, Audrey Strauss, was in place, something he saw as a way to preserve the office’s independence. (Geoffrey Berman later wrote a book describing how Trump and Barr tried to use SDNY as a political tool, for example to protect Trump and go after his enemies.)

The Trump administration took fresh steps in the early days after he returned to the presidency to take control of SDNY. In January 2025, the administration replaced the sitting Attorney with Danielle Sassoon as Acting US Attorney for SDNY, pending confirmation of their chosen candidate, Jay Clayton. Clayton was installed as Acting US Attorney for the Southern District of New York on April 16, but has not yet been confirmed by the Senate for a permanent appointment. Once that happens, the process should move quickly, perhaps you’ll even see the doctored files as early as this summer. However, he’s being blocked by the home-state senators (Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand), who have refused to return their so-called “blue slips.”

Something to consider is who Jeffrey and Ghislaine were, and are. There are bound to be films documenting the assaults. The problem for your democracy is that there will likely be footage of Democrats as well as Republicans, and of Trump.

Ghislaine Maxwell is currently serving her 20-year sentence at FCI Tallahassee in Florida, a low-security facility with an adjacent detention center where inmates can participate in voluntary programs such as art, sports, and yoga. It’s a surprisingly pleasant setting, more like a resort, really, and it doesn’t even have walls.
I seriously do not care if Democrats are implicated. All of the wrong doers should be brought to justice. Let the chips fall.
 

Should the Trump administration release the Epstein files to prove Trump was not involved?

The files should be released, but not because of anything related to Trump.

@Hatuey , if you had left off that slanting qualifier, I would have been happy to respond to your poll.
When one is infected with TDS it is a side affect.
 
.... except that Biden is not a scumbag. That would certainly have stopped him. Unlike Trump, Biden has always had a functioning moral compass.

How would releasing information showing that might stop a literal Hitler from getting elected make him a scumbag?
 
Question:

Should the Trump administration release the Epstein files to prove Trump was not involved?

Response:

BUT........................................................... BIDEN.

And? You have a massive double standard. What can I say?
 
Odd that you would be THIS defensive about Trump. I expect THAT from the other side.
that's because its not about the 'who' here; its about the Joe McCarthiest tactic of guilt by association. What people have been doing with Epstein are suggesting because someone 'partied' with him, flew to his Island, got a photo taken, they must have known that the man was poking teenage girls. I expect the other side to do that.
 
Last edited:
that's because its not about the 'who' here; its about the Joe McCarthiest tactic of guilt by association. What people have been doing with Epstein are suggesting because someone 'partied' with him, flew to his Island, got a photo taken, they must have known that the man was poking teenage girls. I expect the other side to do that.
If one of those people was Trump, it's a safe bet.
 
And? You have a massive double standard. What can I say?
Whataboutism is an argumentative tactic where a person or group responds to an accusation or difficult question by deflection. Instead of addressing the point made, they counter it with “but what about X?”.
 
Whataboutism is an argumentative tactic where a person or group responds to an accusation or difficult question by deflection. Instead of addressing the point made, they counter it with “but what about X?”.

Pointing out hypocrisy is not "whataboutism."
 
How would releasing information showing that might stop a literal Hitler from getting elected make him a scumbag?
??? Unto itself it wouldn't, but no amount of "information" on would keep him from getting elected. I've already established that in Trump's case, it would have had no impact whatsoever on his electability. The bar of Trump's morality is already lying flat on the ground. It's too low to get under, and has been for decades. There isn't a single thing Trump could do, or has done, that will keep his idiot acolytes from voting for him. Nothing. He said it himself more than 10 years ago. He could commit murder in the middle of 5th Avenue, and not lose a single vote. That's how ****ed up in the head his cult of worshipers are. So why would Biden sully his own reputation by piling on Trump, especially knowing that any revelation, no matter how seedy and depraved, would be totally wasted? In the end, history will show, if nothing else, that Biden kept his hands squeaky clean.

Buying porn stars while his wife is pregnant; stealing from charities; money laundering; tax evasion; both admitted, and found libel of, sexual predation; government kleptocracy; publicly selling the power of the White House; attempted treason; overt racism; extortion;
..... fraud after fraud after fraud after fraud! Some of these well documented character milestones date back over 50 years. Trump lies as easily as any sane moral adult exhales. Hell, the ****ing scumbag has 34 felony convictions, and his racist, xenophobic and misogynist moronic 'murricans" still voted for him! Biden exposing Trump's links to Epstein would have just been lowering himself down into the same sewer pipe where Trump lives.
 
If Trump isn't guilty of any wrongdoing, then he shouldn't have to worry about it.
 
Back
Top Bottom