- Joined
- Jan 28, 2013
- Messages
- 94,823
- Reaction score
- 28,342
- Location
- Williamsburg, Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Just askin' . . .
The IPCC climate science crisis looms…
The timing of the fifth assessment report falls into this critical juncture where a lot of momentum has built up in favour of the current modelling practices which now prove so elusive. While the IPCC tries to make last minute rhetorical adjustments in order to accommodate anomalies, some of its participants, looking beyond, already indicate that this institution may have run its course.Story at Die Klimazwiebel
eace
Because instead of being an esteemed scientific body, they became part of the Agenda 21 crowd. A bunch of eugenicist tree huggers bent on world domination.Just askin' . . .
The IPCC climate science crisis looms…
The timing of the fifth assessment report falls into this critical juncture where a lot of momentum has built up in favour of the current modelling practices which now prove so elusive. While the IPCC tries to make last minute rhetorical adjustments in order to accommodate anomalies, some of its participants, looking beyond, already indicate that this institution may have run its course.Story at Die Klimazwiebel
eace
Because instead of being an esteemed scientific body, they became part of the Agenda 21 crowd. A bunch of eugenicist tree huggers bent on world domination.
Just askin' . . .
The IPCC climate science crisis looms…
The timing of the fifth assessment report falls into this critical juncture where a lot of momentum has built up in favour of the current modelling practices which now prove so elusive. While the IPCC tries to make last minute rhetorical adjustments in order to accommodate anomalies, some of its participants, looking beyond, already indicate that this institution may have run its course.Story at Die Klimazwiebel
eace
Just askin' . . .
The IPCC climate science crisis looms…
The timing of the fifth assessment report falls into this critical juncture where a lot of momentum has built up in favour of the current modelling practices which now prove so elusive. While the IPCC tries to make last minute rhetorical adjustments in order to accommodate anomalies, some of its participants, looking beyond, already indicate that this institution may have run its course.Story at Die Klimazwiebel
eace
If the IPCC has run it's course it's because governments can't wait seven years between reports to make critical policy decisions regarding GW. As it stands, scientists have overwhelmingly concluded that man made global warming is a settled issue and want to start focusing more on problem solving and mitigating the effects of GW. There is a growing consensus among scientists that the reports need to be produced more often and more region specific.
Scientists call for overhaul of UN 'blockbuster' climate reports | Environment | theguardian.com
Conspiracy?
Just askin' . . .
The IPCC climate science crisis looms…
The timing of the fifth assessment report falls into this critical juncture where a lot of momentum has built up in favour of the current modelling practices which now prove so elusive. While the IPCC tries to make last minute rhetorical adjustments in order to accommodate anomalies, some of its participants, looking beyond, already indicate that this institution may have run its course.Story at Die Klimazwiebel
eace
A lot of people bought into their crap and then when they actually looked realized they were sold crap. The science is far from settled on this.
If the IPCC has run it's course it's because governments can't wait seven years between reports to make critical policy decisions regarding GW. As it stands, scientists have overwhelmingly concluded that man made global warming is a settled issue and want to start focusing more on problem solving and mitigating the effects of GW. There is a growing consensus among scientists that the reports need to be produced more often and more region specific.
Scientists call for overhaul of UN 'blockbuster' climate reports | Environment | theguardian.com
Whatever you say.:lol::roll:
Thats what the scientists said. They want to start making reports more often and more regional instead of one big blockbuster report every five to seven years. Sounds reasonable to me.
Like Brichers, neocons and other know-nothing groups.Some of those with integrity may want to escape the UN's embrace.eace
Some of those with integrity may want to escape the UN's embrace.eace
3,000 scientists and experts from all over the world applied to be part of IPCC. That was 50% more than applied for AR4. It doesn't look like they want to escape but rather to join up.....
"...In March 2010, the IPCC received approximately 3,000 author nominations from experts around the world. At the bureau session held in Geneva, 19–20 May 2010, the three working groups presented their selected authors and review editors for the AR5. Each of the selected scientists, specialists and experts was nominated in accordance with IPCC procedures, by respective national IPCC focal-points, by approved observer organizations, or by the bureau. The IPCC received 50% more nominations of experts to participate in AR5 than it did for AR4. A total of 559 authors and review editors had been selected for AR4 from 2,000 proposed nominees. On 23 June 2010 the IPCC announced the release of the final list of selected coordinating lead authors, comprising 831 experts who are drawn from fields including meteorology, physics, oceanography, statistics, engineering, ecology, social sciences and economics. In comparison to the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), participation from developing countries was increased, reflecting the on-going efforts to improve regional coverage in the AR5. About 30% of authors will come from developing countries or economies in transition. More than 60% of the experts chosen are new to the IPCC process, which will bring in new knowledge and perspectives.....
IPCC Fifth Assessment Report - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The vast majority of the people around the world don't need the report to see global warming is happening in real time.
Its called weather for a reason.
There has never been enough data to make a solid conclusion on GW.
It's called climate change for a reason.
The last ICPP report, AR4 was filled with over 900 pages of peer reviewed data and that was six years ago. The new report AR5 is rumored to be over 1500 pages of 'new' peer reviewed data. Apparently, with all the new data, the scientists are now 95% certain that man made global warming is occurring.
Oh, you say no and never mind what thousands of scientists, climatologists, researchers, engineers, etc doing the actual research and studying the climate have to say, huh? Have you seen all the data? Or are you drawing a false conclusion based on the limited data that you've personally seen?Lets look at the problem scientifically. What is climate? Long term weather patterns, yes, no? On the order of decades centuries millennia ages, correct. What kind of data and how much do we need, and how precise do we need to get. As much and as precise and as broad as we can. So the real question is do we have enough data to make a conclusion NOW. I say no.
To make GOOD computer models you need data and lots of it. The more you have the better the model. I don't think a centuries worth of data can be adequate to make a somewhat accurate computerized climate model. We do very accurate aerodynamic modeling on computers, enough so we only really need to make prototype aircraft that is out of the normal parameters. But the data to make those models is extensive and the experiments to get it were repeated over and over again. You cant do that with weather. You cant make weather do something over and over at will so as to be able to study it. That's what makes studying climate so very difficult.
Then their work better be accurate, eh? Otherwise, they'd go work for the Koch's.
The IPCC's work hasn't been accurate.
Then their work better be accurate, eh? Otherwise, they'd go work for the Koch's.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?