You're gonna love South Sudan. Pack sun screen.I think Kirk's shooter was a groyper. Terminally online shitposter. Not a "leftist."
Should the Federal government step in and threaten to shut down Debate Politics if they don't ban me?
No but DP has every right to ban someone who says things that inflame violence.I think Kirk's shooter was a groyper. Terminally online shitposter. Not a "leftist."
Should the Federal government step in and threaten to shut down Debate Politics if they don't ban me?
Do you think the OP is "inflaming violence"?No but DP has every right to ban someone who says things that inflame violence.
Do you think the OP is "inflaming violence"?
So you're claiming my statement is "inflaming violence?"No but DP has every right to ban someone who says things that inflame violence.
No he's a flaming something else.Do you think the OP is "inflaming violence"?
Do tell.No he's a flaming something else.
No, however it seems I recall a lot of support not so long ago for banning or censoring “disinformation” when your side was the one doing it.I think Kirk's shooter was a groyper. Terminally online shitposter. Not a "leftist."
Should the Federal government step in and threaten to shut down Debate Politics if they don't ban me?
The support for private companies being allowed to decide their own content policies? Yes, I do recall that too.No, however it seems I recall a lot of support not so long ago for banning or censoring “disinformation.”
He was planning a leveraged buyout of AOL dialup.Does Schweddy have a pending merger?
I know this may come as a surprise to you, but unless you threaten to kill someone, the government doesn't give a shit about you.I think Kirk's shooter was a groyper. Terminally online shitposter. Not a "leftist."
Should the Federal government step in and threaten to shut down Debate Politics if they don't ban me?
Unless you're a comedian or some other critic.I know this may come as a surprise to you, but unless you threaten to kill someone, the government doesn't give a shit about you.
To be clear, you would not support the government ever being involved in censoring “disinformation.” Is that your stance?The support for private companies being allowed to decide their own content policies? Yes, I do recall that too.
Is that the same as the government forcing these decisions onto them? Is that your position?
They appear to care very much about punishing protected speech, actually.I know this may come as a surprise to you, but unless you threaten to kill someone, the government doesn't give a shit about you.
The government never threatened to shut down Facebook if they refused to censor vaccine tinfoil hat nonsense.To be clear, you would not support the government ever being involved in censoring “disinformation.” Is that your stance?
If a comedian limits themselves to DP...and we have a few of those...the government won't give a shit about them, either.Unless you're a comedian or some other critic.
Who was Kimmel threatening to kill?I know this may come as a surprise to you, but unless you threaten to kill someone, the government doesn't give a shit about you.
Other administrations certainly have taken steps to punish speech, but not the Trump administration.They appear to care very much about punishing protected speech, actually.
So, again, you’re willing to say right here, right now, that the government shouldn’t be in the business cracking down on what it deems “disinformation.” I feel this should be easy for you.The government never threatened to shut down Facebook if they refused to censor vaccine tinfoil hat nonsense.
Stop trying to pretend these are equivalent. Doing so just proves which side of this you are on.
When was Kimmel ever on DP?Who was Kimmel threatening to kill?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?