Currently there is 700 miles of existing border barrier, voted for by Pelosi and Schumer. Trump wants to add 300 miles and wanted a total of 25 billion, $5.7 billion in this budget. The shutdown is costing $6 billion per week - costing more than the entire cost of the 300 miles for nothing in return. Simply, the government is spending billions not to have a border barrier, with the Democratic Party claiming a border barrier is "immoral," not just that it doesn't work at all.
If a border barrier is immoral, then then existing 700 miles of existing border barrier be removed because it is immoral and doesn't do anything anyway?
More dumb **** from conservatives, no surprise, they don't actually have an argument.
Some sort of border is useful in highly populated areas, like southern California. It's a smaller area that can be manned so you can see people trying to get by it. Even then, it doesn't stop people from getting in. Just makes it slightly harder. A border across the entire southern border, in desolate areas, which can't possibly be manned and patrolled, it s complete and utter waste of money.
Are you right wingers really this dumb, or just being dishonest to play the partisan hack? It's nothing but complete idiocy to think a border wall is needed or a good idea, that would cost billions, can't possibly be manned, would cost even more in upkeep,can easily be avoided and does not even prevent the majority of immigration and drugs that enter this country
conservatives whined about 3 billion going to insure friggen kids, and they want to spend money on a political ploy that won't do a damn thing to help anybody?
This country has come to really suck with the amount of uneducated, dishonest, unempathetic scumbags. I'd gladly trade the hard working family people from Mexico than a lot of the heartless idiots we have in this country.
now cue the standard dumb responses like "your house has walled" and other unintelligent, idiotic deflections
So a border barrier is or is not immoral?
Currently there is 700 miles of existing border barrier, voted for by Pelosi and Schumer. Trump wants to add 300 miles and wanted a total of 25 billion, $5.7 billion in this budget. The shutdown is costing $6 billion per week - costing more than the entire cost of the 300 miles for nothing in return. Simply, the government is spending billions not to have a border barrier, with the Democratic Party claiming a border barrier is "immoral," not just that it doesn't work at all.
If a border barrier is immoral and worthless, then should the existing 700 miles of existing border barrier be removed because it is immoral and doesn't do anything anyway?
Currently there is 700 miles of existing border barrier, voted for by Pelosi and Schumer. Trump wants to add 300 miles and wanted a total of 25 billion, $5.7 billion in this budget. The shutdown is costing $6 billion per week - costing more than the entire cost of the 300 miles for nothing in return. Simply, the government is spending billions not to have a border barrier, with the Democratic Party claiming a border barrier is "immoral," not just that it doesn't work at all.
If a border barrier is immoral and worthless, then should the existing 700 miles of existing border barrier be removed because it is immoral and doesn't do anything anyway?
Who specifically said a barrier was immoral?
Currently there is 700 miles of existing border barrier, voted for by Pelosi and Schumer. Trump wants to add 300 miles and wanted a total of 25 billion, $5.7 billion in this budget. The shutdown is costing $6 billion per week - costing more than the entire cost of the 300 miles for nothing in return. Simply, the government is spending billions not to have a border barrier, with the Democratic Party claiming a border barrier is "immoral," not just that it doesn't work at all.
If a border barrier is immoral and worthless, then should the existing 700 miles of existing border barrier be removed because it is immoral and doesn't do anything anyway?
If I do not want to spend a fortune on fancy new clothes because I have several nice suits and sport coats in the closet, by your "reasoning" (and I use the term very charitably) I need to throw all the older ones out.
This is a perfect example of the upside down, ass backwards thinking of Trumpkins and their ridiculous attempts to support something that was no more than a hollow campaign sop to a bunch of xenophobic racist deplorable and never intended as a serous public policy.
If a border barrier is immoral and worthless, then should the existing 700 miles of existing border barrier be removed because it is immoral and doesn't do anything anyway?
More dumb **** from conservatives, no surprise,
they don't actually have an argument.
This is a perfect example of the upside down, ass backwards thinking of Trumpkins and their ridiculous attempts to support something that was no more than a hollow campaign sop to a bunch of xenophobic racist deplorable and never intended as a serous public policy.
This is a perfect example of the idiotic Aryan-Phobic hatred you people love to spew.
Should the existing 700 miles of Southern border barrier be removed?
I haven't seen any cost-benefit analysis (combined functional and economic) pertaining to the existing wall structure(s), so I really don't know.
I suspect the return function applicable to extant border fencing is parabolic, but where on the curve we sit and what the removal curve looks like I couldn't say.
More dumb **** from conservatives, no surprise, they don't actually have an argument.
Some sort of border is useful in highly populated areas, like southern California. It's a smaller area that can be manned so you can see people trying to get by it. Even then, it doesn't stop people from getting in. Just makes it slightly harder. A border across the entire southern border, in desolate areas, which can't possibly be manned and patrolled, it s complete and utter waste of money.
Are you right wingers really this dumb, or just being dishonest to play the partisan hack? It's nothing but complete idiocy to think a border wall is needed or a good idea, that would cost billions, can't possibly be manned, would cost even more in upkeep,can easily be avoided and does not even prevent the majority of immigration and drugs that enter this country
conservatives whined about 3 billion going to insure friggen kids, and they want to spend money on a political ploy that won't do a damn thing to help anybody?
This country has come to really suck with the amount of uneducated, dishonest, unempathetic scumbags. I'd gladly trade the hard working family people from Mexico than a lot of the heartless idiots we have in this country.
now cue the standard dumb responses like "your house has walled" and other unintelligent, idiotic deflections
So a border barrier is or is not immoral?
If a border barrier is immoral and worthless.....
More dumb **** from conservatives, no surprise, they don't actually have an argument.
Some sort of border is useful in highly populated areas, like southern California. It's a smaller area that can be manned so you can see people trying to get by it. Even then, it doesn't stop people from getting in. Just makes it slightly harder. A border across the entire southern border, in desolate areas, which can't possibly be manned and patrolled, it s complete and utter waste of money.
Are you right wingers really this dumb, or just being dishonest to play the partisan hack? It's nothing but complete idiocy to think a border wall is needed or a good idea, that would cost billions, can't possibly be manned, would cost even more in upkeep,can easily be avoided and does not even prevent the majority of immigration and drugs that enter this country
conservatives whined about 3 billion going to insure friggen kids, and they want to spend money on a political ploy that won't do a damn thing to help anybody?
This country has come to really suck with the amount of uneducated, dishonest, unempathetic scumbags. I'd gladly trade the hard working family people from Mexico than a lot of the heartless idiots we have in this country.
now cue the standard dumb responses like "your house has walled" and other unintelligent, idiotic deflections
More dumb **** from conservatives, no surprise, they don't actually have an argument.
Some sort of border is useful in highly populated areas, like southern California. It's a smaller area that can be manned so you can see people trying to get by it. Even then, it doesn't stop people from getting in. Just makes it slightly harder. A border across the entire southern border, in desolate areas, which can't possibly be manned and patrolled, it s complete and utter waste of money.
Are you right wingers really this dumb, or just being dishonest to play the partisan hack? It's nothing but complete idiocy to think a border wall is needed or a good idea, that would cost billions, can't possibly be manned, would cost even more in upkeep,can easily be avoided and does not even prevent the majority of immigration and drugs that enter this country
conservatives whined about 3 billion going to insure friggen kids, and they want to spend money on a political ploy that won't do a damn thing to help anybody?
This country has come to really suck with the amount of uneducated, dishonest, unempathetic scumbags. I'd gladly trade the hard working family people from Mexico than a lot of the heartless idiots we have in this country.
now cue the standard dumb responses like "your house has walled" and other unintelligent, idiotic deflections
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?