• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should President Biden be denied Communion for support of abortion?

Should President Biden be denied Communion for support of abortion?


  • Total voters
    111
That made no sense. That’s what people say when they have no valid response.
Well I anointed myself to speak for the majority
Whats next- unannointing me?
 
Does Biden even go to church? If not then the point is moot.

And if supporting abortion is so abhorrent to the Church then why not just excommunicate him?
 
I have no idea what that meant.

this is an open forum. If you don’t welcome responses, don’t provide any of your own.

I think you're a bit confused, but whatever.
 
Does Biden even go to church? If not then the point is moot.

And if supporting abortion is so abhorrent to the Church then why not just excommunicate him?
Actually he went to a Catholic church for a mass in one of the Carolinas for a photo op a while back and was denied communion.

Besides, someone here said that Joe Biden is the most devout Catholic president we've ever had. Of course I think we’ve only had two. Him and JFK.
 
Sure. I also believe that free will can make people make very poor decisions and that those decisions have consequences. Do you disagree?
Free Will does that
 
Abortion is one of those issues that cannot be looked at as black or white.
The question becomes at what point should it be illegal.
Clearly, conception cannot be the point because it is the woman’s body and the fetus is not sentient but at what point is the life she is carrying given the protection for it’s life?
I knew a woman who demanded that women be granted the right to abortion even up until the day before delivery if she so chose.
So it seems that the life a woman is carrying is considered either trash or precious depending on the woman’s feelings toward it.
Then there is the issue of the father who has no say at all before it is born but afterward is responsible or face the wrath of the machinery of the state.
It should be one way or the other.
But I digress. I am not Catholic and this is a matter between him and his church.
 
Actually he went to a Catholic church for a mass in one of the Carolinas for a photo op a while back and was denied communion.

Besides, someone here said that Joe Biden is the most devout Catholic president we've ever had. Of course I think we’ve only had two. Him and JFK.
Interesting. I think Obama claimed Catholicism but I never saw any pictures of him in a church.
I agree about JFK and that was a huge issue in the presidential election in 1960.
 
Interesting. I think Obama claimed Catholicism but I never saw any pictures of him in a church.
I agree about JFK and that was a huge issue in the presidential election in 1960.
Was Obama a Catholic? He was a parishioner of Jeremiah Wright’s church. He wasn’t a Catholic.
 
Abortion is one of those issues that cannot be looked at as black or white.
The question becomes at what point should it be illegal.
Clearly, conception cannot be the point because it is the woman’s body and the fetus is not sentient but at what point is the life she is carrying given the protection for it’s life?
I knew a woman who demanded that women be granted the right to abortion even up until the day before delivery if she so chose.
So it seems that the life a woman is carrying is considered either trash or precious depending on the woman’s feelings toward it.
Then there is the issue of the father who has no say at all before it is born but afterward is responsible or face the wrath of the machinery of the state.
It should be one way or the other.
I'm not trying to be contentious at all, and your point is valid. Which, IMO, brings the argument to this. The father knows the rules going into the game, and the father should make certain he has his own back covered, and not 'assume' that things can, and often do occur, when one chooses to engage in unprotected sexual intercourse with a female.
 
I absolutely love that this is the kind of thing we're arguing about. Instead of denying a pandemic
 
Back
Top Bottom