oracle25
Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2006
- Messages
- 136
- Reaction score
- 0
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
jfuh said:Yes so where is the reviewed article I asked for?
I gave you one.
Nope, I will as I say immediately accept what you say as fact as long as you provide me with any single reviewed article proving creationism.
You give an unacceptable burden of "magic-bullet" proof, that if you applied to your own theory would not stand up to even the slightest scrutiny.
You're site does not succesfully test anything. It's purly theoretical nor is methodology provided at all.
I don't know if you caught it, I hope you did because it was right there in big bold letters. HE was right. He pinned the magnetic field of the outer planets perfectly, you evolutionists did not get anywhere close.
No, this is not a cheap ploy to knock you off balance. You believe in the literary truth of creationism as it was written in the OT of the bible so I'm going strictly by that exactly.
*sigh* It appears I have given you too much credit. You should be able to figure out why this is impossible to prove.
Now that is a total lie. You have not shown any evidence at all, you've presented ideas and baseless rebuttles of the evidence we have provided. I can back up everything I've stated with peer reviewed journals, can you?
You have provided no evidence. Just baseless arguments of your own.
Uninformed? No, I've asked you for your reviewed publication, I have yet to see it. Thus again I say, if you can not provide a single reviewed article, you're just spealing religious dogma.
The article I gave you was reviewed by many other scientists. his predictions have since been confirmed, how is this not what you wanted?