I don't think smoking should be allowed in any establishment where the public or workers are expected to breathe. Sorry, I was an idiot who smoked for 35 years and now has a smoking related illness. I am not sympathetic to anyone who thinks they have a right to smoke any place they want. Everyone does have the right to expect a smoke free environment.
If you smoke, do yourself, family, friends and co-workers a favor and STOP. You'll eventually learn to enjoy a cup of coffee or a beer without that poison. If you fail, try it again and again and again until you succeed.
/rant
OK. :lol: As for why we didn't "head down the road," well, again - on a road trip with kids in the car. You take what you get.
We aren't ever going to agree on this, so have a fabulous evening. :2wave:
I used to be a smoker. I am for keeping smoking out of restaurants and bars.I am against exposing workers to 2nd hand smoke just because the business owner thinks it will make him or her a few extra bucks. That said I would be for making it legal to smoke in bars and restaurants as long as the owner/proprietor is the only one allowed to bring smokers their food and drink and there should be severe fines and possible loss of business for violating this.Should cigarette smoking be allowed in some bars & restaurants?
Most states have blanket bans against smoking in all bars and restaurants. No exceptions. As a result, you often see smokers huddled in small groups outside partaking in cigarettes.
I am not, and have never been, a smoker but to me this in inherently unfair. IMO, the state should set aside special permits for a small percentage of bars and restaurants where smoking be allowed. To pick a number, I would say 10% to 15% of bars and restaurants should be allowed to have smoking inside. Have them post a large sign at each entrance notifying potentials customers, so everyone is fully informed and able to make their own choice. No one needs to go in and act surprised.
I don't see the need to make them age-restricted to 18+ or 21+, but I could live with that compromise.
What think you?
Yes, I remember this also and L.A. was even earlier in the restaurant bans. OTOH, the law allows for owner operated bars with no employees to allow smoking thereby giving those owners a real advantage. So, you know, everything is a tradeoff.
The basis of most of this legislation had to do with the employees, not the customers so much. As a smoker (I used to smoke in theaters, airplanes and department stores believe it or not), I've watched the noose tighten. My initial reaction was anger but I've come around to accepting these restrictions.
But place like NYC that make it a point to make smokers suffer and allow no exceptions - are just jerks to me. Everything needs some balnc.
-----
Now that I discovered E-Cigs, I smoke in all these places again. Ha-ha!!!
-----
There are many things not left to owners. Bathrooms, fire alarms, minimum wages etc. In many cases, this may be for the best although it does feel like an imposition.
Smokers have the right to suck it in, but exhaling that crap is another story.
Now that I discovered E-Cigs, I smoke in all these places again. Ha-ha!!!
The basis of most of this legislation had to do with the employees, not the customers so much. As a smoker (I used to smoke in theaters, airplanes and department stores believe it or not), I've watched the noose tighten. My initial reaction was anger but I've come around to accepting these restrictions.
But place like NYC that make it a point to make smokers suffer and allow no exceptions - are just jerks to me. Everything needs some balnc.
-----
Now that I discovered E-Cigs, I smoke in all these places again. Ha-ha!!!
-----
There are many things not left to owners. Bathrooms, fire alarms, minimum wages etc. In many cases, this may be for the best although it does feel like an imposition.
Well to be fair, the animals were never in the cooking areas and many restaurants didn't allow them inside; but they could chill on the patio or something outside.
True, but last I checked, employees aren't forced to work in any particular establishment. They have as much a choice as the owners of the establishment.
Should cigarette smoking be allowed in some bars & restaurants?
Most states have blanket bans against smoking in all bars and restaurants. No exceptions. As a result, you often see smokers huddled in small groups outside partaking in cigarettes.
I am not, and have never been, a smoker but to me this in inherently unfair. IMO, the state should set aside special permits for a small percentage of bars and restaurants where smoking be allowed. To pick a number, I would say 10% to 15% of bars and restaurants should be allowed to have smoking inside. Have them post a large sign at each entrance notifying potentials customers, so everyone is fully informed and able to make their own choice. No one needs to go in and act surprised.
I don't see the need to make them age-restricted to 18+ or 21+, but I could live with that compromise.
What think you?
Smoking, whether it is allowed or prohibited should be left to the determination of the individual owner of the establishment.
It's his property and the government, hell, no one has the right to dictate what is and isn't allowed.
Only until 1998., Then the complete ban in all bars and restaurants went into effect.
One I remember going to often was Louisiana Hots, in Palmdale. One of the local hotspots, their Friday Karaoke was hugely popular, and seeing somebody come in like Jamie Jones (All-4-One), Noah Hathaway (Boxy, Atrayu) and Afroman were regular occurrences on Friday night. But when the ban went into effect, the business basically crashed. They tried to put in outside smoking areas, but the county said each was in violation of some kind of ordinance, so eventually you would go there and see 100 people in the parking lot, but nobody inside.
A year later they closed their doors. I talked to the owner right before that happened, and he said the 100% smoking ban killed him. And several other places I went to suffered the same fate. In most of California other ordinances restrict or prohibit outside seating which allow smoking, so the only choice is to leave the business. The most recent prohibits smoking within 20 feet of a door or window, which outlawed most of the patios which allowed smoking, since I have never seen one 20 feet from a doorway.
Once smoking bans went into effect bars became "family friendly". Many good, REAL, bars have been ruined since families began bringing their children because the environment is smoke free.
Once smoking bans went into effect bars became "family friendly". Many good, REAL, bars have been ruined since families began bringing their children because the environment is smoke free.
I'm certainly inclined to agree with you. If the owner so chooses to allow smoking in his establishment and hangs a shingle outside making it very clear smoking is allowed then those who don't wish to be around the smoke need not enter. Same with an owner that wants a smoke free establishment. Those who smoke need not bitch about it but move on to a place that allows it. These laws get passed at the state level where the self-righteous decide what is best for everyone. They just can't let people make their own choices and take responsibility for them. They are the same ones that vote yes on the increase of every sin tax that comes down the pike too. With the way government is encroaching now on determining what a person can eat, I'm looking for governments to start taxing the fat. Maybe then some folks will wake up and see the light.
But aren't you treading on ours, by forcing us to inhale your smoke? Why can't you just stand outside? Or better yet, wait til your meal is over?
Had there been other choices, I would have walked out. I guarantee that if there was a restaurant where I live that allowed smoking, I'd never patronize the place. I'd choose somewhere else. But I was on a road trip, and as I mentioned, this was the only place around for a while.
Also, I don't have to worry about restaurants changing their policy. The government has taken care of that for me.
Should cigarette smoking be allowed in some bars & restaurants?
Most states have blanket bans against smoking in all bars and restaurants. No exceptions. As a result, you often see smokers huddled in small groups outside partaking in cigarettes.
I am not, and have never been, a smoker but to me this in inherently unfair. IMO, the state should set aside special permits for a small percentage of bars and restaurants where smoking be allowed. To pick a number, I would say 10% to 15% of bars and restaurants should be allowed to have smoking inside. Have them post a large sign at each entrance notifying potentials customers, so everyone is fully informed and able to make their own choice. No one needs to go in and act surprised.
I don't see the need to make them age-restricted to 18+ or 21+, but I could live with that compromise.
What think you?
I wouldn't call for a ban on the internal combustion engine or smoking because I believe people have a right to smoke. But those smokers don't have a right to pollute other peoples space.Call for a country-wide ban on the internal combustion engine and then sing me that song...
Who brings their kids into a bar? That's not good parenting. I thought you had to be 18 to enter a bar...21 to drink in the bar....period. Hell I got carded the other day just for stepping into Cigars International!
I wouldn't call for a ban on the internal combustion engine or smoking because I believe people have a right to smoke. But those smokers don't have a right to pollute other peoples space.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?