lifeisshort
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2014
- Messages
- 1,337
- Reaction score
- 421
- Location
- the high desert
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
So a marriage between same sex couples is now legal across the land so the logical nest issue is bigamy.If the same sex can be married why not multiple partners? It sees like the term marriage and family are now open ended terms and are being redefined daily so if you are for gay marriage you surly must be for bigamy too I would think. Or are you?
So a marriage between same sex couples is now legal across the land so the logical nest issue is bigamy.If the same sex can be married why not multiple partners? It sees like the term marriage and family are now open ended terms and are being redefined daily so if you are for gay marriage you surly must be for bigamy too I would think. Or are you?
Do you really mean polygamy? Even in a polygamous relationship each partner is in only one marriage at a time, although they may be not be the only man/woman in that marriage. Polygamy is about removing the limit of two marriage partners while bigamy permits one to be an multiple marriages at the same time. SSM seeks to keep the two partner limit but to (only) remove the opposite gender requirement for the partners, while bigamy seeks to allow marriage partnerships to overlap.
So a marriage between same sex couples is now legal across the land so the logical nest issue is bigamy.If the same sex can be married why not multiple partners? It sees like the term marriage and family are now open ended terms and are being redefined daily so if you are for gay marriage you surly must be for bigamy too I would think. Or are you?
So a marriage between same sex couples is now legal across the land so the logical nest issue is bigamy.If the same sex can be married why not multiple partners? It sees like the term marriage and family are now open ended terms and are being redefined daily so if you are for gay marriage you surly must be for bigamy too I would think. Or are you?
So a marriage between same sex couples is now legal across the land so the logical nest issue is bigamy.If the same sex can be married why not multiple partners? It sees like the term marriage and family are now open ended terms and are being redefined daily so if you are for gay marriage you surly must be for bigamy too I would think. Or are you?
It should also be noted that bigamy only applies to the legal status. So one can be in a polygamous marriage, albeit one not legally recognized, without engaging in bigamy.
The arguments in favor of SSM:
- Children do best in two parent married households. SSM therefore benefits children.
- Marriage promotes social stability.
- No good reason to oppose it.
For other types of marriage I would expect supporters to show similar reason for support. I have not seen such from supporters of bigamy/polygamy, but would certainly be willing to look at their arguments and data if they want to present it.
So a marriage between same sex couples is now legal across the land so the logical nest issue is bigamy.If the same sex can be married why not multiple partners? It sees like the term marriage and family are now open ended terms and are being redefined daily so if you are for gay marriage you surly must be for bigamy too I would think. Or are you?
Complaining about dozens of threads on a specific topic is ridiculous, given it's very common around here. Just like every five years we rehash the same stuff over, there's not much chance of changing that.
So a marriage between same sex couples is now legal across the land so the logical nest issue is bigamy.If the same sex can be married why not multiple partners? It sees like the term marriage and family are now open ended terms and are being redefined daily so if you are for gay marriage you surly must be for bigamy too I would think. Or are you?
The arguments in favor of SSM:
- Children do best in two parent married households. SSM therefore benefits children.
- Marriage promotes social stability.
- No good reason to oppose it.
For other types of marriage I would expect supporters to show similar reason for support. I have not seen such from supporters of bigamy/polygamy, but would certainly be willing to look at their arguments and data if they want to present it.
All that you say is true yet nothing you have said justifies law being made by a judge. Why do we have constitutional amendments #15 and #20 if amendment #14 really grants those rights? One can certainly make a similar argument (valid or not) that amendment #14 makes marijuana possession/use legal when one state allows that "right" and that "blue laws" violate amendment #21/#14. What bothers me is that many state (county and city) laws conflict (treat the same act/right differently) but are not said to violate amendment #14's equal protection "mandate".
Your post has nothing whatsoever to do with anything I said,
I would never enter into a polygamist marriage myself. However, looking at it from the outside in:
1. The children in multiple households are raised with the wives sharing their rearing, and sharing in the capacity of a mother figure at all times
2. It's none of my business
Unless it leads to taking young girls as sexual partners and/or wives. 8)
That's illegal. I wasn't talking about illegal activity.
So a marriage between same sex couples is now legal across the land so the logical nest issue is bigamy.If the same sex can be married why not multiple partners? It sees like the term marriage and family are now open ended terms and are being redefined daily so if you are for gay marriage you surly must be for bigamy too I would think. Or are you?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?