- Joined
- Aug 3, 2018
- Messages
- 34,752
- Reaction score
- 3,961
- Location
- north carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Meet some former and/or current members of Mueller's biased team of anti-Trump investigators:
Robert Mueller: Obama head of FBI, 2009-2013.
Jeannie Rhee: Deputy AG under Obama, large Hillary campaign donor.
Andrew Weissman: Special counsel to FBI under Obama, big Hillary campaign donor.
James Quarles: Big democrat donor for decades, from Dukakis to Hillary.
Michael Dreeben: Deputy AG under Obama.
Aaron Zebley: Special FBI agent under Mueller in Obama administration.
Greg Andres: Deputy Assistant AG under Obama.
Should partisan hacks recuse themselves from political witch-hunts? Not democrats, according to democrats.
Whew! You'll be happy to know, in that case, that there is no evidence that any of those people are biased or 'partisan hacks' and there's no witch-hunt occuring.
It will be a comfor to you to learn that Mueller is a lifelong conservative republican, appointed by another lifelong conservative republicans who was installed by another conservative republican.
Yay! I love being the bearer of great news!
Whew! You'll be happy to know, in that case, that there is no evidence that any of those people are biased or 'partisan hacks' and there's no witch-hunt occuring.
It will be a comfor to you to learn that Mueller is a lifelong conservative republican, appointed by another lifelong conservative republicans who was installed by another conservative republican.
Yay! I love being the bearer of great news!
Mueller has personally hurt several innocent people badly and has been responsible in part for the US paying out damages exceeding $100 million to the wronged parties. I don't care if he is a republican, he is a wicked unrepentant man.
Meet some former and/or current members of Mueller's biased team of anti-Trump investigators:
Robert Mueller: Obama head of FBI, 2009-2013.
Should partisan hacks recuse themselves from political witch-hunts? Not democrats, according to democrats.
Meet some former and/or current members of Mueller's biased team of anti-Trump investigators:
Robert Mueller: Obama head of FBI, 2009-2013.
Jeannie Rhee: Deputy AG under Obama, large Hillary campaign donor.
Andrew Weissman: Special counsel to FBI under Obama, big Hillary campaign donor.
James Quarles: Big democrat donor for decades, from Dukakis to Hillary.
Michael Dreeben: Deputy AG under Obama.
Aaron Zebley: Special FBI agent under Mueller in Obama administration.
Greg Andres: Deputy Assistant AG under Obama.
Should partisan hacks recuse themselves from political witch-hunts? Not democrats, according to democrats.
The swamp doesn't care about Party affiliation.
Mueller has personally hurt several innocent people badly and has been responsible in part for the US paying out damages exceeding $100 million to the wronged parties. I don't care if he is a republican, he is a wicked unrepentant man.
Whew! You'll be happy to know, in that case, that there is no evidence that any of those people are biased or 'partisan hacks' and there's no witch-hunt occuring.
It will be a comfor to you to learn that Mueller is a lifelong conservative republican, appointed by another lifelong conservative republicans who was installed by another conservative republican.
Yay! I love being the bearer of great news!
There is also no evidence Trump did anything,
but the entire exercise has been to make Trumps life a difficult as possible.
At the minimum the nation is owed progress reports.
I get the feeling the liberal progressives are not uncomfortable will abuse of state power.
"The swamp" = anything that tries to contradict Mycrofts predetermined conclusions.
Robert Mueller: Bush head of FBI, 2001-2008
...but of course you conveniently skipped that part...
/thread
There is also no evidence Trump did anything, but the entire exercise has been to make Trumps life a difficult as possible. At the minimum the nation is owed progress reports.
I get the feeling the liberal progressives are not uncomfortable will abuse of state power.
Robert Mueller, political opportunist. Appointed by Bush just on time to prevent Congress from seeing FBI documents in the case involving the FBI's framing of 4 innocent men for murder, sending 3 of them to death row. Mueller is a crooked cop for hire to the highest bidder.
Devin Nunes - Member of trump's transition team. Also the chair of the house "intelligence" committee tasked with investigating trump's colluding with Russia. So biased that for a short time had to recuse himself for being such a worthless toad.
Richard Burr - National security advisor to the trump campaign. Also in charge of investigating trump's involvement with Russia.
Matthew Whitaker - current acting AG replacing Sessions - has publicly stated that the Russia investigation should be shut down.
These are just three examples of current conflicts of interest by the GOP. I have tons more.
Now what were you saying?
Nonsense.
There is also no evidence Trump did anything, but the entire exercise has been to make Trumps life a difficult as possible. At the minimum the nation is owed progress reports.
I get the feeling the liberal progressives are not uncomfortable will abuse of state power.
I was saying biased democrats involved with political issues want republicans to recuse themselves from investigations but never biased democrats.
Link to any information regarding damages paid by the U.S. as a result of the Mueller investigation please. Inforwars or Breitbart don't count, thank you.
I was saying biased democrats involved with political issues want republicans to recuse themselves from investigations but never biased democrats.
My info is from multiple sources, none of which are Breitbart. Are you biased against Breitbart? Do you consider Breitbart to be a publisher of fake news?
Yeah, yeah, keep shoveling the conspiracy theory BS... Trump is proud of you. Your propaganda dissemination is wonderful, tovarisch!
So you're saying you have called for Nunes and Burr to renounce their chairmanships, correct?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?