Yes, he should be President Trump's "wingman." You agree, don't you? You agreed that was the proper role when Obama was president.
Trump Praises Attorney General Barr For 'Taking Charge' Of Roger Stone Case
Headline begs the question. See the poll.
If you can find anything remotely similar between AG holder and President Obama's actions and the current pair of jokers I'd be interested in hearing about it. I'll wait, it may take you a long time before you admit there is nothing.
The Congress can remove the DOJ from the executive branch any time it so desires.
No. They can't. The DOJ executes laws, that's a constitutional duty of the executive branch.
If you can find anything remotely similar between AG holder and President Obama's actions and the current pair of jokers I'd be interested in hearing about it. I'll wait, it may take you a long time before you admit there is nothing.
The Congress can remove the DOJ from the executive branch any time it so desires.
They can make them an independent agency.
refusing to prosecute black panthers standing outside, and by outside I mean at the door, a polling place with batons.
Yep, simply have congress re-write the Constitution.
If you can find anything remotely similar between AG holder and President Obama's actions and the current pair of jokers I'd be interested in hearing about it. I'll wait, it may take you a long time before you admit there is nothing.
They can make them an independent agency.
No they can't. They are a part of executing the laws which is the constitutional duty of the Executive branch. All power in the executive branch is ceded to cabinet members and their respective agencies by the President. Congress decides what the laws are and the judicial decides whether those laws are Constitutional or not.
You'll be coming to a point soon, right?
That is the point. The Congress can make them an independent agency.
Trump Praises Attorney General Barr For 'Taking Charge' Of Roger Stone Case
Headline begs the question. See the poll.
The Black Panthers have not existed for decades. Why are you attempting to slander an historical organization? Gee... Why?
Why ?
New Black Panther Party voter intimidation case - Wikipedia
If they are going to act as voter monitors, neither one of them should have a weapon. Its not slander, its what happened.
Yes they can. Under your argument there would be no independent agencies like the CIA because they are part of defense and defense is the POTUS' constitutional duty.
So it wasn't the Black Panthers. Did you lie or make a mistake? You lied because you want to slander an historical organization for obvious reasons. Conflating the Black Panthers and the New Black Panthers (no relation or cross-over whatsoever) is a staple of racists.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?