• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should Al Gore Be Subpeonaed to Testify Before the Senate for His Earlier Lies?

Should Former VP Al Gore Be Required to Explain His Earlier False Statements?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 17 68.0%
  • No.

    Votes: 8 32.0%

  • Total voters
    25

Scarecrow Akhbar

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
11,430
Reaction score
2,282
Location
Los Angeles
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent


Well, Al Gore testified under oath before the Senate. If it can be proven that his false statements were deliberate lies, he should be prosecuted for perjury.

No one's above the law, remember, not even the former vice-president of a man convicted of perjury himself.

Also, the EPA should be enjoined from enforcing any carbon-related regulations until granted specific authority to do so by law. That's independent of global warming. Only a crazy society would give unelected bureaucrats the authority to seize control of major elements of industrialized society without specific authority from the elected representatives.

And that permission from the politicians should await the resolution of the global warming hoax.
 
Al Gore's argument is so rock-solid that he doesn't even need to debate his critics. He's above the scientific process of scrutiny...
 
Al Gore's argument is so rock-solid that he doesn't even need to debate his critics. He's above the scientific process of scrutiny...

Biggest laugh I have had in many a long day. Very very funny.
 
And they can question him about how he would benefit monetarily under the Cap and Trade System. ($>
 
And they can question him about how he would benefit monetarily under the Cap and Trade System. ($>

While we're at it, can we question Cheney how he benefited from defense contracts for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?
 
While we're at it can we keep using the government's time and resources for purely partisan bickering and finger pointing as opposed to you know its actual job.
 
While we're at it can we keep using the government's time and resources for purely partisan bickering and finger pointing as opposed to you know its actual job.

You mean that's not it's actual job?
 
They have nothing better to do than stage a glorified multi-million dollar movie review for something that came out years ago.
 
If getting them to subpeona and prosecute Al Gore for his deliberate lies that have caused us to risk Crap and Trade will delay the Senate's implementation of Messiah-Care, by all means, it's worth doing.
 

That's like democrats requesting Bush be subpeonaed. Come on, seriously?
 
That's like democrats requesting Bush be subpeonaed. Come on, seriously?
Public hearings before congress are just a way for the politicians to get publicity.
 
Every single "fact" presented in his movie has been proven false.

Are you saying your favorite vice president is so stupid he can't tell when he's being hornswoggled?

This is why I and many others don't respect or like you. You make untrue assumptions about people based on their ideology. Anyways, you still have yet to prove he committed perjury. Was he under oath during his movie or something? You have to prove he committed perjury.
 
Funny because its somewhat true?

If it's true then Al Gore should have no problem debating his critics. Do you think Stephen Hawking would refuse to defend his books? Hawking, being a real scientist, would most likely welcome the opportunity to demonstrate the validity of his theories, as opposed to Al Gore, who pompously declares the debate over, as if he were the king of science. His hubris and hypocrisy is nauseating, and the damage he's done to science is immeasurable. A just society would throw him in prison for the fraud he's perpetrated.
 

His movie was presented as science. Do you think it should be lawful for people to commit scientific fraud? How would you feel if a doctor told you that you couldn't get AIDS from unprotected sex? Does Gore bear any responsibility for the consequences of his movie, consequences which effected and still effect the potential governance of the entire planet?
 

I'm saying Gore didn't break a law, can you prove he did? And your comparison to doctors is terrible, does Gore of a doctorate in science?
 
I'm saying Gore didn't break a law, can you prove he did?

He committed fraud. I'm not sure if there is a specific statute that applies, but he was intentionally deceptive.

And your comparison to doctors is terrible, does Gore of a doctorate in science?

You don't like the doctor analogy? Fine, how would you feel if a commercial told you its condoms were 100% effective against AIDS and later you found out they were actually made of a permeable membrane? I mean, it's not like the corporate executives are experts or anything. You shouldn't expect them to know if they're claims are totally false and misleading, right?

By the way, are you saying Al Gore is not an expert on climate change?
 
Last edited:
While we're at it, can we question Cheney how he benefited from defense contracts for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?

Well, not part of the OP but if someone starts a thread asking whether or not Cheney has profited from the war my answer would be YES.
 
That's another bad analogy, why would you listen to someone who has no credibility?
 



If he deliberately lied yes he should be prosecuted.
 
Al Gore presenting and narrating this movie was certain to politicize the cause. No?

Anybody could see that coming! So clearly that all involved should be ashamed of themselves.
 
Absolutely not. That's not the sort of thing the Senate should be bothering with and wasting our tax payers money on, regardless if its right or left.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…