Denial of sexism is a form of sexism.
Besides, truly pro-choice men are going to tend to agree with me, because it's not gonna bruise their egos to do so.
It's like if Godwin's Law and creationism got together and had a retarded incest baby.
1) To say that my taxpayer dollars don't fund elective abortions because (with sarcastic tone) "The gov't says it won't happen" or "people at Planned Parenthood say it won't" is so naive it isn't even funny.
Through the law. I'm not sure how you are answering my point. If abortion is considered murder then it is obviously quite different to who one sleeps with in private or even marries. So talk about conservative big gov't is obviously misplaced.Oh really? Then tell me, if abortion becomes illegal, how are they gonna enforce against all the back-alley abortions? Police staffs are already overworked as is.
Just like Northerners tried to impose their views on slave-owning Southerners, right? How immoral of those Northerners.
Wow, really starting to get inappropriate, especially in a thread about reproduction. (And I'm pro-choice too).
Nope, I want the Federal gov't to stop funding the murder of babies. Simple enough for you?Incredibly lame response. You just deny it. Great.
So what do you want? It's already illegal. Do you want it to be double-secret illegal?
Nope, I want the Federal gov't to stop funding the murder of babies. Simple enough for you?
OH MY GOSH!!! Do you read? I said, I do not want Federal funds paying FOR ANY ABORTION, NO MATTER THE CAUSE!!!! . The current version of the Hyde Amendment allows abortion for rape, incest, or health of the mother. DO YOU UNDERSTAND NOW?So what you're saying is you want the government to make it ilegal to use federal funds for abortion? Is that it? Because I want to be clear on this. Maybe Congress could call that, say, the "Hyde amendment" in honor of former congressman Henry Hyde. You think he'd like that?
Nope, I want the Federal gov't to stop funding the murder of babies. Simple enough for you?
I don't get it. Why shouldn't a rape victim be allowed to take a pill to end something growing in her that was FORCEFULLY implanted????
I don't get it. Why shouldn't a rape victim be allowed to take a pill to end something growing in her that was FORCEFULLY implanted????
Is the woman justified in killing the baby once the baby is born? If you can't justify it outside of the womb, then you can't justify it inside of the womb.
If a woman has an egg available and she doesn’t get a sperm for it she has killed her baby, his too. It is not hard to understand this. You are making a mistake when you arbitrarily define when a baby is created. Where do those like you get that so obviously incorrect perception? Note that even some religions have decided this since coupling with birth control is forbidden.Is the woman justified in killing the baby once the baby is born? If you can't justify it outside of the womb, then you can't justify it inside of the womb.
Because that pill can sometimes cause abortions. One could reverse your simplistic statement and put it from a pro-life position;I don't get it. Why shouldn't a rape victim be allowed to take a pill to end something growing in her that was FORCEFULLY implanted????
How do you propose defining it? If you do it scientifically, a zygote is an organism.You are making a mistake when you arbitrarily define when a baby is created.
It will only matter from a pro-life perspective, but there is genuine conflicting academic opinion and evidence on whether the 'Morning After Pill' can act as an abortifacient in some cases and this seems enough to make it illegitimate to pro-life folks.A couple of things:
Thing one: The morning after pill is a contraception. IF all things are favorable for conception it, the morning after pill prevents conception. Further, it isn't easy to conceive. No matter, the morning after pill is a contraceptive option not an abortive one.
Thing two: My religion, and I suppose there are others, does not take an inflexible position on abortion. We probably don't all totally agree on when of if, but we do not condemn people for making the decision to have an abortion or not to have an abortion.
I fully understand that some religions may disagree. Some people and some faiths take a very rigid stand on contraception and abortion. I have no problem with that. I suggest that everyone live by their particular beliefs regarding contraception and abortion. I have done that and I will continue to.
OH MY GOSH!!! Do you read? I said, I do not want Federal funds paying FOR ANY ABORTION, NO MATTER THE CAUSE!!!! . The current version of the Hyde Amendment allows abortion for rape, incest, or health of the mother. DO YOU UNDERSTAND NOW?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?