- Joined
- May 1, 2013
- Messages
- 141,316
- Reaction score
- 99,110
- Location
- Outside Seattle
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
You simply don't like my answer... what else is there to say about it?
Repeating it doesnt make it true.
You simply don't like my answer... what else is there to say about it?
The people who you really want to register their guns can’t be forced to. It doesn’t seem that a registration does anything to prevent someone from killing another person.When a car changes hands it is registered with the State.
If we are to compare guns to cars... why cannot the same happen for firearms?
If we are too impose a barrier to entry then the State should pick up the cost.I do, as a taxpayer, esp. where you (nor anyone else) has proven that most people dont get training anyway.
That's what the justices said.
![]()
When a car changes hands it is registered with the State
If we are to compare guns to cars... why cannot the same happen for firearms?
Some people break the law... why have laws?The people who you really want to register their guns can’t be forced to. It doesn’t seem that a registration does anything to prevent someone from killing another person.
More like why have laws that can not be enforced on criminals.Some people break the law... why have laws?
If we are too impose a barrier to entry then the State should pick up the cost.
Taking the stance of " I don't want my tax dollars" blah blah blah nonsense when it comes to gun safety is a little strange I must say.
Studies have shown that States with licensing and registration requirements tend to have fewer of the guns sold in that State show up at crime scenes. The guns that show up are from States with much looser requirements.OK, then we'll continue to go and use the gun/car comparisons...nice.
What crimes does registration stop? It does nothing regarding stolen guns.
Some people break the law... why have laws?
Then why have laws?More like why have laws that can not be enforced on criminals.
Studies have shown that States with licensing and registration requirements tend to have fewer of the guns sold in that State show up at crime scenes. The guns that show up are from States with much looser requirements.
So there is that.
Are you asking why we should have constitutional laws and not unconstitutional laws or acting dumbThen why have laws?
It means nothing, instead of admitting that registration willI dont know what that even means. Please provide your sources for context.
Easy.I dont know what that even means. Please provide your sources for context.
No right is absolute.Are you asking why we should have constitutional laws and not unconstitutional laws or acting dumb
Easy.
States that have stricter Registration and Licensing laws tend to have fewer guns sold within that State show up at crime. scenes.
Thats an UNDER estimate.....350,000,000
The only difference with other countries is that everyone here can be a militia of one
In what world are you living in that commiting acts of violence isn't already preached against and punished?
Targeting gun owners? That is just as silly as saying that mandatory seatbelt laws are targeting car owners. Minor inconveniences are not a full out assault on liberty.
An entire generation has had to go through active shooter lockdown drills because what else could the nation do?
When a car changes hands it is registered with the State.
If we are to compare guns to cars... why cannot the same happen for firearms?
Some people break the law... why have laws?
So that we can charge them with breaking one and then hold them accountable through due process.Some people break the law... why have laws?
I see that you've avoided responding to what I posted to you about the unfairness of your accusation.Well the Right claim it's a mental health issue, let's see the GOP House put some money into community mental health care.
No right is absolute.