If it's his kid and he wants the kid, why does he need anything more?
You are not answering my question.
Upon what basis do you say the child is his?
Sperm donors sign away their rights and responsibilities for the children that come about from their donation. That has very little to do with a father generally speaking.
He wasn't a father until the courts made him a father. He wasn't even supporting the mother while she was pregnant-- maybe through no fault of his own, but this is still the fact.
Just so we're clear here.....
Because he fathered the child, this gives him NO rights?
Because the mother is a whore, he has no saying in the raising of HIS Heirs?
You're not answering the question either. Why
should it?
We're not talking about a man who has raised a child as his own for years. We're talking about a man who didn't know that a child
existed until another family had raised that child for twenty-two months.
They are the rightful parents.
By this logic, men should not pay child support if a woman demands a divorce.
Men should not pay child support at all, unless the mother has offered the child to him and he has accepted it. If a couple divorces after they have children, he should absolutely pay child support-- and he should absolutely have full parental rights.
If this woman had an affair with another man and the child was not his, I am most positive, given the evidence, she would have used that against him.
Yes, but then would you still support his "right" to demand custody of the child? Or would you instead insist that the "right" belongs to the piece of **** that slept with a married woman?
Instead, she threatened to abort THEIR child. She knew it was THEIR child and used it to threaten him.
HER child, that existed solely within
HER womb. She had every right to abort the child.
By law, a woman has the right to demand support from the father if he is no longer around.
This law allows women to coerce men into becoming fathers against their will. This is considered wrongful when women are subjected to it, and yet people use the
same arguments to justify coercing men into fatherhood without so much as noticing the irony-- "he made that decision when he had sex"; "he should have kept it in his pants then" and so forth, arguments that are rightfully dismissed as misogynist, "slut shaming" garbage when applied to women in the abortion debate.
By the same law, a man should have the right to a child if the mother does not wish to support the child.
The mother gestated the child in her womb for nine months. What did the "father" do?
Then you have to clarify your stance on many things so that we are all clear on your beliefs..
I'm fine with that.
If a woman demands a divorce and also demands sole custody, does the man still pay child support against his will?
Assuming he's been father to the child, yes. And she should not have the
right to demand full custody unless it can be proven that he is an unfit parent. He is a father, and he has rights.
If a woman and a man have unprotected sex and the woman gets pregnant and the woman wants an abortion, does the man have a say if he wants the child?
Absolutely not. If he wanted a child, he should have slept with a woman who wanted to give him one.