Bold.
I'm stopping at the bold. Why? Because Condor is lying again. If one accesses the article and scrolls down, one sees that the shading of the map changes as messages corresponding to the reason for the change propagate at the bottom and rise at the time. Condor knows that would be impossible/hell to copy/paste. So what Condor does is lie.
Moreover, there are multiple maps in that article.
Moreover, there is far more text. Here is a snippet:
Homicide arrest rates vary widely when examined by the race of the victim: An arrest was made in 63 percent of the killings of white victims, compared with 48 percent of killings of Latino victims and 46 percent of the killings of black victims. Almost all of the low-arrest zones are home primarily to low-income black residents. The data, which The Post is making public, is more precise than the national homicide data published annually by the FBI. The federal data fails to distinguish whether a case was closed due to an arrest or other circumstances, such as the death of the suspect, and does not have enough detail to allow for the mapping of unsolved homicides. In Omaha, police made an arrest in nearly 60 percent of homicides across the city. But the 12-block area where Dickson was killed saw an arrest in just 15 percent of its homicides. “It’s one of the best indicators of how well a police department and a community work together,” said Omaha Police Chief Todd Schmaderer. “If a police department can’t solve the greatest crime, the most egregious crime affecting society, what faith would you have in that police department?”
That's from OP's link. The full article looks like it has to be 10-20 pages long. But Condor says the bit quoted is the entirety.
Why did Condor lie (again) about the contents of a source?
I think Condor060 should stop lying. Don't you?
