• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Senator Jeff Sessions Supports Adelholt Bill to Block Amnesty

AmericanSpartan

AmericanSpartan

Banned
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
10,734
Reaction score
2,142
Location
Las Vegas
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
The new GOP-majority Congress has gotten off to an energetic start, and that includes legislation to scuttle the Obama’s executive amnesty. Senator Sessions endorses the Repeal Executive Amnesty Act of 2015, H.R.191, authored by Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-AL).

NumbersUSA has a list of what the bill would do:


• Prohibit the President’s use of granting parole to illegal aliens

• Prohibit the Administration from granting work permits to all illegal aliens

• Defund all executive actions on immigration, including all memos issued by the Department of Homeland Security

• Close the loophole that played a large role in last summer’s border surge by treating illegal aliens from non-contiguous countries the same as contiguous countries, making them easier to remove

• Prohibit illegal aliens from accessing Social Security, medicare, and benefits from the Affordable Care Act

• Reinstate the Secure Communities program

• Restrict federal funding to municipalities that provide sanctuary to illegal aliens

• Prohibit the government from providing legal council to illegal aliens in removal proceedings

• Restrict the Administration’s ability to grant and extend Temporary Protected Status to illegal aliens

Here’s a press release from Senator Sessions concerning the legislation:

Sessions Endorses Aderholt Bill To Block Exec. Amnesty, Catch-And-Release - News Releases - Senator Jeff Sessions
 
that is a start but Mr. obstruction will veto it.
and even if he doesn't it won't make it through the senate. the democrat obstructionists will stop it.

they need these people in the country and groups like ACORN and other to sign them up to vote.
 
ludin said:
that is a start but Mr. obstruction will veto it.
and even if he doesn't it won't make it through the senate. the democrat obstructionists will stop it.

they need these people in the country and groups like ACORN and other to sign them up to vote.
Click to expand...

Or, we could have border security, limited immigration, and voter ID laws and the dems lose power..
 
AmericanSpartan said:
Or, we could have border security, limited immigration, and voter ID laws and the dems lose power..
Click to expand...

All :failpail: arguments that GOP leaders give lip service to but have already dismissed.

Where is the GOP House plan for immigration reform, the one they've been PROMISING for the last two years?

The one that got Cantor fired over by TEA party radicals !
 
NIMBY said:
All :failpail: arguments that GOP leaders give lip service to but have already dismissed.

Where is the GOP House plan for immigration reform, the one they've been PROMISING for the last two years?

The one that got Cantor fired over by TEA party radicals !
Click to expand...

That was not immigration reform that was amnesty..

Secure the border first then America will decide..
 
NIMBY said:
All :failpail: arguments that GOP leaders give lip service to but have already dismissed.

Where is the GOP House plan for immigration reform, the one they've been PROMISING for the last two years?

The one that got Cantor fired over by TEA party radicals !
Click to expand...

We don't need immigration reform.
 
NIMBY said:
All :failpail: arguments that GOP leaders give lip service to but have already dismissed.

Where is the GOP House plan for immigration reform, the one they've been PROMISING for the last two years?

The one that got Cantor fired over by TEA party radicals !
Click to expand...

no one considers amnesty immigration reform.
This is a start.

illegal immigration is a felony, punishable by up to two years in prison. Immigrants who are deported and attempt to re-enter can be imprisoned for 10 years. Visa violators can be sentenced to six-year terms.

deport foreigners who are deemed detrimental to “economic or national interests,” violate US law, are not “physically or mentally healthy” or lack the “necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents

Mexico's Immigration Law

Just change mexico to US. that is a start.
 
AmericanSpartan said:
The new GOP-majority Congress has gotten off to an energetic start, and that includes legislation to scuttle the Obama’s executive amnesty. Senator Sessions endorses the Repeal Executive Amnesty Act of 2015, H.R.191, authored by Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-AL).

NumbersUSA has a list of what the bill would do:


• Prohibit the President’s use of granting parole to illegal aliens

• Prohibit the Administration from granting work permits to all illegal aliens

• Defund all executive actions on immigration, including all memos issued by the Department of Homeland Security

• Close the loophole that played a large role in last summer’s border surge by treating illegal aliens from non-contiguous countries the same as contiguous countries, making them easier to remove

• Prohibit illegal aliens from accessing Social Security, medicare, and benefits from the Affordable Care Act

• Reinstate the Secure Communities program

• Restrict federal funding to municipalities that provide sanctuary to illegal aliens

• Prohibit the government from providing legal council to illegal aliens in removal proceedings

• Restrict the Administration’s ability to grant and extend Temporary Protected Status to illegal aliens

Here’s a press release from Senator Sessions concerning the legislation:

Sessions Endorses Aderholt Bill To Block Exec. Amnesty, Catch-And-Release - News Releases - Senator Jeff Sessions
Click to expand...

Works for me.
 
AmericanSpartan said:
The new GOP-majority Congress has gotten off to an energetic start, and that includes legislation to scuttle the Obama’s executive amnesty. Senator Sessions endorses the Repeal Executive Amnesty Act of 2015, H.R.191, authored by Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-AL).

NumbersUSA has a list of what the bill would do:


• Prohibit the President’s use of granting parole to illegal aliens

• Prohibit the Administration from granting work permits to all illegal aliens

• Defund all executive actions on immigration, including all memos issued by the Department of Homeland Security

• Close the loophole that played a large role in last summer’s border surge by treating illegal aliens from non-contiguous countries the same as contiguous countries, making them easier to remove

• Prohibit illegal aliens from accessing Social Security, medicare, and benefits from the Affordable Care Act

• Reinstate the Secure Communities program

• Restrict federal funding to municipalities that provide sanctuary to illegal aliens

• Prohibit the government from providing legal council to illegal aliens in removal proceedings

• Restrict the Administration’s ability to grant and extend Temporary Protected Status to illegal aliens

Here’s a press release from Senator Sessions concerning the legislation:

Sessions Endorses Aderholt Bill To Block Exec. Amnesty, Catch-And-Release - News Releases - Senator Jeff Sessions
Click to expand...

Senator Sessions is awesome.
 
cpwill said:
Senator Sessions is awesome.
Click to expand...

He is great, the people love him, hell he ran unopposed in his election just because the dems knew they could not destroy this man... I think he should run for the White House.
 
AmericanSpartan said:
He is great, the people love him, hell he ran unopposed in his election just because the dems knew they could not destroy this man... I think he should run for the White House.
Click to expand...

Every time I get pissed off at Shelby (I am from Alabama. Our other senator is a douche) I think of Sessions and breathe.
 
Jeff Sessions is a good old Alabama piece of ****. He rightfully belongs in Alabama.
 
AmericanSpartan said:
The new GOP-majority Congress has gotten off to an energetic start, and that includes legislation to scuttle the Obama’s executive amnesty. Senator Sessions endorses the Repeal Executive Amnesty Act of 2015, H.R.191, authored by Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-AL).

NumbersUSA has a list of what the bill would do:


• Prohibit the President’s use of granting parole to illegal aliens

• Prohibit the Administration from granting work permits to all illegal aliens

• Defund all executive actions on immigration, including all memos issued by the Department of Homeland Security

• Close the loophole that played a large role in last summer’s border surge by treating illegal aliens from non-contiguous countries the same as contiguous countries, making them easier to remove

• Prohibit illegal aliens from accessing Social Security, medicare, and benefits from the Affordable Care Act

• Reinstate the Secure Communities program

• Restrict federal funding to municipalities that provide sanctuary to illegal aliens

• Prohibit the government from providing legal council to illegal aliens in removal proceedings

• Restrict the Administration’s ability to grant and extend Temporary Protected Status to illegal aliens

Here’s a press release from Senator Sessions concerning the legislation:

Sessions Endorses Aderholt Bill To Block Exec. Amnesty, Catch-And-Release - News Releases - Senator Jeff Sessions
Click to expand...
How is he going to make President Obama sign it? It seems to me this is just a waste of time. I doubt any president would sign it, as it would limit the executive powers of the POTUS and could be used as a presedent in future legislation. Sessions is playing politics IMHO.
 
pbrauer said:
How is he going to make President Obama sign it? It seems to me this is just a waste of time. I doubt any president would sign it, as it would limit the executive powers of the POTUS and could be used as a presedent in future legislation. Sessions is playing politics IMHO.
Click to expand...

Make him veto it, and then get some dems to help over ride it as they can not lose any more of their voter base...

Really so not protecting the border against a endless wave of crime, poverty, and disease is not playing politics?
 
Texmex said:
I wasn't throwing feces, I was identifying some of it.
Click to expand...

How is he a piece of ****? How is securing the border not a mandate and important thing?

How is repealing the law the leftist used to allow in the last wave of illegals a great thing?
 
AmericanSpartan said:
How is he a piece of ****? How is securing the border not a mandate and important thing?

How is repealing the law the leftist used to allow in the last wave of illegals a great thing?
Click to expand...

We need more immigrants, not less.
 
Texmex said:
We need more immigrants, not less.
Click to expand...

No, we do not.

We all ready take in more then a million legally, plus God know how many illegally.

We do not need more then 200,000 people a year and even then it should be only highly skilled labor as ot not suppress wages, burden taxpayers and systems, and effect our demographics, culture, and politics.
 
pbrauer said:
How is he going to make President Obama sign it? It seems to me this is just a waste of time. I doubt any president would sign it, as it would limit the executive powers of the POTUS and could be used as a presedent in future legislation. Sessions is playing politics IMHO.
Click to expand...

It's not a waste of time revealing who "the party of no" really is.
 
countryboy said:
It's not a waste of time revealing who "the party of no" really is.
Click to expand...

Neither is the party of no - I offer the national debt as evidence. We need to elect representatives capable of actually making choices and simply saying no to spending more than they will dare ask for in taxation.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Neither is the party of no - I offer the national debt as evidence. We need to elect representatives capable of actually making choices and simply saying no to spending more than they will dare ask for in taxation.
Click to expand...

I don't disagree. I was merely highlighting the hypocrisy of some.

Believe me, when Jeb Bush, and Krispy Kreme are the GOP front runners, I have little faith in repubes today.
 
countryboy said:
It's not a waste of time revealing who "the party of no" really is.
Click to expand...

The party of no is the Republican Party as the table below of cloture motions clearly shows:

[TABLE="align: center"]
[TR="class: contentsubtitle"]
[TD="colspan: 5, align: center"]Senate Action on Cloture Motions[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: contentsubtitle"]
[TD]Congress[/TD]
[TD]Years[/TD]
[TD]Motions Filed[/TD]
[TD]Votes on Cloture[/TD]
[TD]Cloture Invoked[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]114[/TD]
[TD]2015-2016[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]113[/TD]
[TD]2013-2014[/TD]
[TD]253[/TD]
[TD]218[/TD]
[TD]187[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]112[/TD]
[TD]2011-2012[/TD]
[TD]115[/TD]
[TD]73[/TD]
[TD]41[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]111[/TD]
[TD]2009-2010[/TD]
[TD]137[/TD]
[TD]91[/TD]
[TD]63[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]110[/TD]
[TD]2007-2008[/TD]
[TD]139[/TD]
[TD]112[/TD]
[TD]61[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]109[/TD]
[TD]2005-2006[/TD]
[TD]68[/TD]
[TD]54[/TD]
[TD]34[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]108[/TD]
[TD]2003-2004[/TD]
[TD]62[/TD]
[TD]49[/TD]
[TD]12[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]107[/TD]
[TD]2001-2002[/TD]
[TD]71[/TD]
[TD]61[/TD]
[TD]34[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]106[/TD]
[TD]1999-2000[/TD]
[TD]71[/TD]
[TD]58[/TD]
[TD]28[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]105[/TD]
[TD]1997-1998[/TD]
[TD]69[/TD]
[TD]53[/TD]
[TD]18[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]104[/TD]
[TD]1995-1996[/TD]
[TD]82[/TD]
[TD]50[/TD]
[TD]9[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]103[/TD]
[TD]1993-1994[/TD]
[TD]80[/TD]
[TD]46[/TD]
[TD]14[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]102[/TD]
[TD]1991-1992[/TD]
[TD]60[/TD]
[TD]48[/TD]
[TD]23[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]101[/TD]
[TD]1989-1990[/TD]
[TD]38[/TD]
[TD]24[/TD]
[TD]11[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

https://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/cloture_motions/clotureCounts.htm
 
countryboy said:
I don't disagree. I was merely highlighting the hypocrisy of some.

Believe me, when Jeb Bush, and Krispy Kreme are the GOP front runners, I have little faith in repubes today.
Click to expand...

After this push for gun control Krispy Kreme is finished..Done.

Jeb Bush and his support for common core and his statement of illegal immigration is "an act of love" after the wave of illegals that crossed..He is done.
 
pbrauer said:
The party of no is the Republican Party as the table below of cloture motions clearly shows:

[TABLE="align: center"]
[TR="class: contentsubtitle"]
[TD="colspan: 5, align: center"]Senate Action on Cloture Motions[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: contentsubtitle"]
[TD]Congress[/TD]
[TD]Years[/TD]
[TD]Motions Filed[/TD]
[TD]Votes on Cloture[/TD]
[TD]Cloture Invoked[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]114[/TD]
[TD]2015-2016[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]113[/TD]
[TD]2013-2014[/TD]
[TD]253[/TD]
[TD]218[/TD]
[TD]187[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]112[/TD]
[TD]2011-2012[/TD]
[TD]115[/TD]
[TD]73[/TD]
[TD]41[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]111[/TD]
[TD]2009-2010[/TD]
[TD]137[/TD]
[TD]91[/TD]
[TD]63[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]110[/TD]
[TD]2007-2008[/TD]
[TD]139[/TD]
[TD]112[/TD]
[TD]61[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]109[/TD]
[TD]2005-2006[/TD]
[TD]68[/TD]
[TD]54[/TD]
[TD]34[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]108[/TD]
[TD]2003-2004[/TD]
[TD]62[/TD]
[TD]49[/TD]
[TD]12[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]107[/TD]
[TD]2001-2002[/TD]
[TD]71[/TD]
[TD]61[/TD]
[TD]34[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]106[/TD]
[TD]1999-2000[/TD]
[TD]71[/TD]
[TD]58[/TD]
[TD]28[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]105[/TD]
[TD]1997-1998[/TD]
[TD]69[/TD]
[TD]53[/TD]
[TD]18[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]104[/TD]
[TD]1995-1996[/TD]
[TD]82[/TD]
[TD]50[/TD]
[TD]9[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]103[/TD]
[TD]1993-1994[/TD]
[TD]80[/TD]
[TD]46[/TD]
[TD]14[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]102[/TD]
[TD]1991-1992[/TD]
[TD]60[/TD]
[TD]48[/TD]
[TD]23[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]101[/TD]
[TD]1989-1990[/TD]
[TD]38[/TD]
[TD]24[/TD]
[TD]11[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

https://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/cloture_motions/clotureCounts.htm
Click to expand...

Really? Didn`t Harry Reid have more then 300 bills on his desk that he would not bring to a vote?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom