- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 134,496
- Reaction score
- 14,621
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Clearly reason to vote for a guy who bankrupted just about everything he touched and sought to avoid bankruptcy by just plain not paying contractors.
Trump really mist piss off liberals because they always ignore the positive accomplishments to divert from the failures of both Obama and Hillary.
a habitual liar and incompetent like Hillary
on;1066178851]I think that is a foolish smear for someone to be making when that someone is ignoring everything negative about Trump in order to get to a canned rant about liberals.
Oh dear. You're not actually telling a lie as dumb as that Trump isn't a habitual liar and incompetent?
I think that is a foolish smear for someone to be making when that someone is ignoring everything negative about Trump in order to get to a canned rant about liberals.
Oh dear. You're not actually telling a lie as dumb as that Trump isn't a habitual liar and incompetent?
I think that is a foolish smear for someone to be making when that someone is ignoring everything negative about Trump in order to get to a canned rant about liberals.
Oh dear. You're not actually telling a lie as dumb as that Trump isn't a habitual liar and incompetent?
Clearly revisionist history regarding something that happened over a decade ago. Trump really mist piss off liberals because they always ignore the positive accomplishments to divert from the failures of both Obama and Hillary. Clearly someone who has business experience, management and executive skills, has actually hired and fired people, had to deal with a P&L definitely doesn't have the qualifications of a habitual liar and incompetent like Hillary
Wow. You mean Clinton is kicking Trump's butt this bad without Sanders voters. This is even worse news for Trump.
Over a decade ago? You living in a box or something? He hastons of lawsuits against him for unpaid bills...
His bad business record was reported up to 2005 which is over a decade ago.
The lawsuit in this country is innocent until proven guilty which you seem to ignore when the person has a R after their name
And it has not gotten better since has it now?
His Trump Taj Mahal is closing due to.. bankruptcy. Yes he does not own it anymore, but the problems started when he did.
Trump Magazine... folded 2009,
Trump Mortgage.. folded 2007.
Trump Streaks.. no sales at all.
Trump Travel Site.. folded 2007.
Trump Tower Tampa.. a con job that never got off ground and he was again sued.. 2008. He managed to settle out of court and cost investors hundreds of thousands of dollars each..
Trump University.. on going, and could land him in jail.
Trump Vodka.. out of business 2011
Apprentice.. fired last year?
There are many more all since 2005...
Face it, the man is a con man.. he talks a good game but in reality he is no where near as succesful as his "media personality" says he is.
Yes.. but when you have 3000 on going lawsuits against you or by you.. then the "innocent until proven guilty" aspect kinda is hollow.
let me know when he goes to jail. Think he will have a cell next to Hillary? Oh, wait, Hillary has a D after her name and thus is untouchable. Read the Wiki Leaks emails today? Of course not
I actually suggest you do some research on all those issues and see who also is to blame for many of those failures but I could be wrong about the decade old, not to concerned about Trump Vodka but everything else is about 9 or more years old except for Trump U and that is in the courts but in this country one is innocent until proven guilty
Is there anything in the email leaks that is illegal and not done by the Republicans?
Excuses excuses
Apparently national security isn't of any importance to you nor poor judgment. Why is it you never address the issues raised but instead divert from the issues?
Wait.. what? National security? LOL since when does the right believe in that? The day you guys outed a serving CIA agent for political payback.. was the day you lost the moral high ground on "national security".. And what on earth does the DNC emails have to do with national security? Are you talking about the Hilary emails, where there were 3 emails that were "top secret" but not labelled properly?
LOL, another liberal brainwashing action, you actually believe Wilson was a covert CIA agent? Wow, liberalism certainly has a tool in you.
What on earth do DNC emails have to do with national security? you really don't have a clue, do you? Why don't we just put all govt. emails on the internet so people like you can share those with whoever you want? What you don't seem to understand or willingly accept is that it is Hillary's judgment that is the issue and points to her lack of competence but then again she has a D after her name so you have very low standards.
I am sure you supported her when she supported the War in Iraq, didn't you? How about the Arab Spring? how about the support she gave our Ambassador in Libya? I know, doesn't matter does it?
=PeteEU;1066186101]Wilson? Why you talking about him?
And what you dont seem to understand is the utter hypocrisy of the GOP and conservatives like you. You had your own email scandal among others.. and yet they were nothing and are to be ignored? You have GOP members disclosing classified material to the public, but naw that is just fine.. You have GOP operatives having private GOP email systems where they run the White House through.. but hey that is just fine!. ****ing hypocrites!
I dont support Hilary.. in fact I dont like her. And I certainly did not support her voting for the Iraq war.. but considering the miss-information she was fed by a Republican government, then I can forgive her on that one. She was no different than the American people at the time.. being abused by Bush White House and the GOP.
As for her "support of your Ambassador".. more hypocrisy. Where was the "support" for all the other attacks against US diplomats under Bush? Or was it that this time, it was an ambassador that died? Yea those employees dont matter right? Low grade, low paid idiots.. Ambassadors matter only!.. right?
Does diplomatic security matter? Of course it does, but lets not forget that the ambassadors death was partly his own fault. He should not have been there, and he was known for being a tad lax on security in general. He was a great man of the people, but that can get you killed as we have seen. Blaming Hilary solely for what happened is disproportionate, illogical and frankly utterly partisan bull****. Your own Republican jackboots have done so many investigations and ALL OF THEM have cleared Hilary.
So take of your blinders and look at the choices you have. You have Hilary.. yes she has flaws.. massive flaws. But can she put a team together that can do the job? You betcha. Then you have Trump.. a con man, a lying piece of **** that fantasies about dating his own daughter.. a man that has failed business after failed business... and so on and so on.. Can he put a team together to run the country? His history says no. He is a one man "army" and does not listen to anyone. He is a con man..
So you have a choice.. the devil you know (Hilary) for 4 years.. or the devil you dont know (Trump).. I know what I would choose... reluctantly.
Wait.. what? National security? LOL since when does the right believe in that? The day you guys outed a serving CIA agent for political payback.. was the day you lost the moral high ground on "national security".. And what on earth does the DNC emails have to do with national security? Are you talking about the Hilary emails, where there were 3 emails that were "top secret" but not labelled properly?
Clearly reason to vote for a guy who bankrupted just about everything he touched and sought to avoid bankruptcy by just plain not paying contractors.
you being paid to post this here?
Apparently you don't get much news in Denmark. Think this isn't a problem? You immediately convict Trump but ignore the charges against Hillary.
Clinton accused of aiding Moscow ops with push for 'Russian Silicon Valley' | Fox News
So many charges and yet not one of them is important to you? Yes, I know, Hillary isn't your candidate but according to you she can put a team together to do exactly what? Bury is further in debt? Make us less secure in the world? Further promote dependence and entitlements? Is there ever going to come a point in time that you say enough of Hillary Clinton and the liberal agenda?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?