- Joined
- Dec 10, 2017
- Messages
- 10,720
- Reaction score
- 5,260
- Location
- Middle Tennessee
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
So, nothing...thought so.It's been well documented. Russia interfered in the 2016 election and it likely made the difference in narrow states. Besides, do you really think I care about what you "label" me?
And that is just not true. The FBI had already had intel from others and Papadopoulos. Keep up, Mycroft.
My guess is that Nunes is trying to find out what the FBI has on him per his role on the Transition.
Read the dossier and review testimony from witnesses yourself. You won't admit the facts, thus far. Your posts are based on lies.
If the FBI had hard evidence or sources prior to Steele's meeting with the FBI, why did Obama's top intel chiefs breif Congress, Obama and candidate Trump on the contents of the dossier ? Why didnt they breif Congress on this intel ?
Obama Top Intel chiefs present Trump and Obama with claims of Russian efforts to compromise Trump
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cn...d-trump-intelligence-report-russia/index.html
Here's the Lefts dilemma, before the invention of the Popadopolis fake narrative, the Media obsessed over the dossier.
They presented the dossier and its allegations as legitimate intel, and so did Obama's FBI, CIA, NSA and DOJ.
So this desperate attempt to rewrite the narrative isn't going to work.
What Fienstein did was highly unethical and desperate to boot and her actions show just how seriously the Democrats are taking this growing scandal
He knows exactly what Nunez hasAdam Schiff's disappearance is signifigant too.
It's been well documented. Russia interfered in the 2016 election and it likely made the difference in narrow states. Besides, do you really think I care about what you "label" me?
It's been well documented. Russia interfered in the 2016 election and it likely made the difference in narrow states. Besides, do you really think I care about what you "label" me?
Whether it's used or not is irrelevant.Actually, there IS evidence what the FBI used for the FISA request...and Nunes has it. That's not disinformation. That's fact.
What is likely hiding is the degree to which the Russian and Russian interests account for his net worth.
The IRS has nothing to do with state and local taxes, including property taxes, to which the article refers. Moreover, the IRS is way understaffed, and really isn't that on top of US taxes.
We looked at the
14 bankruptcies, how could somebody go through so many
15 bankruptcies, you know, and still have a billion
16 dollars in personal assets. So those are the kinds
17 of things. We looked at a lot of things like his
18tax bills. Tax bills are useful because you can
19 figure out how much money someone is making or how
20 much they're worth or how much their properties are
21 worth based on how much they have to pay in taxes.
22 One of the things we found out was that, you
23 know, when it comes to paying taxes, Donald Trump
24 claims to not have much stuff. At least the Trump
25 organization. So they would make filings with
----------Top of page 71-------------------
1various state and local authorities saying that
2 their buildings weren't worth much.
Whether it's used or not is irrelevant.
You should post the evidence that it was the sole reason it was used for the FISA warrant, otherwise, just more speculation from Mycroft.
Just a thought; Protest is not trying to destroy the Nation, it proves how Great this Nation is.Keep showing just how radical the leftwing Democrats are today as discussion and cooperation are just words and not action. You radical leftists are trying to destroy a once great nation but keep losing elections. Keep it up
Democrats planning protests for Trump?s first State of the Union | TheHill
Just a thought; Protest is not trying to destroy the Nation, it proves how Great this Nation is.
Sorry but protest proves nothing other than some people disagree enough with something that they are willing to get off their butt and go make a public statement on it.No this proves how arrogant and radical the left has become, this is a state of the union message, go, sit on your hands and here what Trump has to say, then react. Radicals have taken over the Democratic Party that I grew up with and that is destroying the party. Keep it up and keep losing elections
Sorry but protest proves nothing other than some people disagree enough with something that they are willing to get off their butt and go make a public statement on it.
I, for one, do not attend protests or marches, not my thing, but have no problem with anyone else dong so as long as they do so peacefully. As for the speech, I am sure there will be plenty to discuss after he makes it, but yes I agree, we have to wait to see what he says before reacting to it.
How do you disagree with something that hasn't been said? Has the state of the union speech been heard yet?
I never said I would, maybe you should re-read my post, I said we need to wait for it before commenting on what is in it.
Nothing new, this has been done more than once. Stupid IMO but their right. I think radicals have taken over Both Parties.I posted the article claiming that some DNC members of Congress wouldn't be attending the state of union in protest and that is the issue, not listening to what is being said but protesting anyway. Seems that everything else that Trump says gets a reaction so why not wait until AFTER the SOU to protest? Radicals have taken over the Democratic Party and they demand to be heard but never to listen to what others say.
1. This has been covered ad nauseim. The dossier is a professional intelligence report by a professional intelligence source with a great reputation, who routinely provides intelligence reports to various nations including the U.S. It's neither partisan propaganda, nor lies. It's raw intelligence, and much of it has shown to be true/accurate.Whether the dossier was used or not is irrelevent ?
Is totally relevent. The dossier was always just Democrat funded partisan propaganda and lies, it was never legitimate intelligence, and it never should have been treated as such by the FBI and our intelligence agencies
A courtesy that maybe they should not have extended to him.But it was, Obama's Intel chiefs actually briefed Congress and candidate Trump on the dossier
So no evidence, just hand waiving towards some media outlets...There are 4 active libel suits now against media outlets who published the dossier and Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele, including a suit filed by Carter Page.
Multiple media outlets have reported that the dossier was used to obtain the FISA warrant to monitor Page.
Glenn Simpson, the Fusion GPS founder who sponsored the unverified anti-Trump dossier, claimed in August and again Jan. 2 that the FBI has a source inside the Trump camp who lent credence to the document.
When a transcript of his secret August testimony was released on Tuesday, news headlines immediately latched onto the disclosure as a boon to a dossier whose core charges of Donald Trump-Russia collusion have been denied and not confirmed publicly.
Then suddenly, as quick as the headlines went up, some one close to Fusion was waving off reporters. Mr. Simpson had “mischaracterized” the source. It was not some one on the Trump inside, but apparently an Australian diplomat.
A source close to Fusion GPS tells me there was no walk-in source––that was a mischaracterization by Simpson of the Australian diplomat tip about Papadopoulis [sic],” tweeted NBC reporter Ken Dilanian.Whether the source the FBI supposedly told Mr. Steele about could be Mr. Papadopoulos is doubtful. He has pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about issues surrounding his contacts with the professor. The criminal complain says the FBI did not interview him until January 2017, three months after Mr. Steele met with the agents in Rome.
Glenn Simpson retracts claim FBI had a mole inside Trump team - Washington Times
The story corrections correction caught the eye of Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, Iowa Republican, who on Thursday sent off a letter to Fusion attorney Joshua Levy. Mr. Grassley demanded to know why Mr. Levy did not correct the record after spending hours reviewing the transcript in October and November or contact the committee last Tuesday.” If it is true that your client’s statement to the Committee was a mischaracterization, why did you not attempt to correct your client’s statement as soon as you and/or he realized it was not accurate?” the senator wrote.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?