will i empathize with your views, i do not agree with them
that forum member has every 'right' to present him/herself as any of the rest of us
that you do not like it should not cause his presentation to be censored
I think the owners of DP have every right to kick open racists off the forum.
have been to too many such sites where tolerance was not practiced
the result was those remaining forum members essentially held the same views
besides, i would prefer to deal with an overt racist than a covert one ... and there are many covert ones on this site
stick around and embarrass all of them for their ignorant views
She's unqualified because she is black and a woman? Wow....well at least you don't hide your bigotry.
I'd like to see your evidence that Lynch is an "affirmative action baby."
You mad bro? :lol:
chale, you just look spiteful.
You should be ashamed by youR avatar that makes the first lady look like a monkey. I can't believe that is allowed here and will be complaining to the mods. I would hope the rest of those posters with a shred of decency would follow suit.
will i empathize with your views, i do not agree with them
that forum member has every 'right' to present him/herself as any of the rest of us
that you do not like it should not cause his presentation to be censored
Very well said.
I think Lynch is a poor but entirely predictable pick. But you're making an important point, so thank you.
This is the mexico-firster who said illegals have a right to work in america even though the law says they can't!!!! Now she's our top cop.
I assure you no republican in the senate thinks she's adequate. But ten of them were paid bribes to vote for her.
The board notes that all you have is namecalling. thanks for admitting you're in the wrong.
Looks like the right isn't nearly as partisan as I thought. Nearly but not all.
You should be ashamed by youR avatar that makes the first lady look like a monkey. I can't believe that is allowed here and will be complaining to the mods. I would hope the rest of those posters with a shred of decency would follow suit.
We've had far worse, and survived.
Gonzales's tenure as U.S. Attorney General was marked by controversy regarding warrantless surveillance and the legal authorization of so-called "Enhanced interrogation techniques," generally acknowledged as constituting torture. Following bipartisan calls for his removal, Gonzales resigned from the office "in the best interests of the department," on August 27, 2007, effective September 17, 2007.[2] Democrats were particularly opposed to Gonzales for his role in the firings of several U.S. Attorneys which they believed had caused his office to become improperly politicized.
Alberto Gonzales - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wasn't Gonzales the First Hispanic Attorney General ? Wasn't it considered Historic too?
The burden of proof is on the liberals to show she is NOT an AA baby. AA is everywhere. Both obama and ben carson have admitted they got AA.
Yes and yes. :2wave: howdy MMC.
This is insane. Not only is she anti-america, but she is also a double affirmative action baby being both black and female. Totally unqualified but none of that matters anymore. Without AA she'd be a waitress.
This is insane. Not only is she anti-america, but she is also a double affirmative action baby being both black and female. Totally unqualified but none of that matters anymore. Without AA she'd be a waitress.
She's unqualified because she is black and a woman? Wow....well at least you don't hide your bigotry.
Unfortunately, due to the racist affirmative action policies in america, it's impossible to tell if she's qualified or not.
The burden of proof is on the liberals to show she is NOT an AA baby. AA is everywhere. Both obama and ben carson have admitted they got AA.
another affirmative action poster child who has spend almost 40 years getting positions solely due to her race
Your hyperbole does nothing to lessen myb statement. No President is going to nominate a completely unqualified person for a cabinet position.In theory yes, but it has to be within reason. You cannot appoint a quack to the function of Surgeon General. Selling snake-oil to gullible fools with no medical degree, experience or capacity does not make someone fit to be surgeon general, no matter how much a president would want that.
And you cannot make a pacifist, draft dodging, deserter hippie become secretary of defense.
A president should have a large level of independence for picking his team, but not without oversight. And that is no matter who the president is, democrat or republican, the choice must be a reasonable one or the senate should block it for that reason (not to play political games).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?