• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sen Kennedy grills activist on graphic books in school libraries:

anatta

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
33,281
Reaction score
15,156
Location
daily dukkha
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Notice this quote from Durban from the article.. he's claiming if a book that is erotic , one parent cant tell another parent not to let their child read it
That's wrong. and the mechanism to make these standards is the school board. The librarians are only the staff, they have no editorial control of material
Judiciary Chairman Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said both "no one" is advocating for sexually explicit material for children, and that it’s "a distraction from the real challenge."

"I understand and respect that parents may choose to limit what their children read, especially at younger ages. My wife and I did. Others do, too. But no parent should have the right to tell another parent’s child what they can and cannot read in school or at home," he said.
Kennedy repeatedly asked progressive student activist Cameron Samuels — who uses they/them pronouns — whether parents should have any say in what books make it onto the shelves of public libraries.

One of those books Kennedy read from, "All Boys Aren’t Blue" by George M. Johnson, has been banned in at least 29 local school districts and includes a graphic description of anal sex and other activities.

"I put some lube on and got him on his knees, and I began to slide into him from behind," Kennedy read from the book, which is a memoir of Johnson’s life. "I pulled out of him and kissed him while he masturbated."

Samuels, co-founder of Students Engaged Texas, said of the book that if students can’t read books like "All Boys Aren’t Blue," then "they cannot learn about abuse." The activist added the book "isn’t erotic" and that parents should collaborate with educators.

"None of you want to answer my question, you come here, and you say censorship is bad, and of course it's bad. But… you heard the books we're talking about," Kennedy said. "So, tell me what you want, who gets to decide, and all I've heard is it’s the librarians and parents have nothing to do with it.

Before questioning Samuels, the GOP leader turned to Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias and asked whether whether only librarians should make decisions on book selections.

"We are advocating for parents, random parents not to have the ability under the guise of keeping kids safe to try and challenge the world view of every single manner on these issues," Giannoulias said.

Earlier this year, Illinois passed a first-of-its kind law that bars public libraries from receiving state funding beginning in 2024 if they ban books because of "partisan or doctrinal" issues.
 
Notice this quote from Durban from the article.. he's claiming if a book that is erotic , one parent cant tell another parent not to let their child read it
That's wrong. and the mechanism to make these standards is the school board. The librarians are only the staff, they have no editorial control of material
Judiciary Chairman Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said both "no one" is advocating for sexually explicit material for children, and that it’s "a distraction from the real challenge."

"I understand and respect that parents may choose to limit what their children read, especially at younger ages. My wife and I did. Others do, too. But no parent should have the right to tell another parent’s child what they can and cannot read in school or at home," he said.
Kennedy repeatedly asked progressive student activist Cameron Samuels — who uses they/them pronouns — whether parents should have any say in what books make it onto the shelves of public libraries.

One of those books Kennedy read from, "All Boys Aren’t Blue" by George M. Johnson, has been banned in at least 29 local school districts and includes a graphic description of anal sex and other activities.

"I put some lube on and got him on his knees, and I began to slide into him from behind," Kennedy read from the book, which is a memoir of Johnson’s life. "I pulled out of him and kissed him while he masturbated."

Samuels, co-founder of Students Engaged Texas, said of the book that if students can’t read books like "All Boys Aren’t Blue," then "they cannot learn about abuse." The activist added the book "isn’t erotic" and that parents should collaborate with educators.

"None of you want to answer my question, you come here, and you say censorship is bad, and of course it's bad. But… you heard the books we're talking about," Kennedy said. "So, tell me what you want, who gets to decide, and all I've heard is it’s the librarians and parents have nothing to do with it.

Before questioning Samuels, the GOP leader turned to Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias and asked whether whether only librarians should make decisions on book selections.

"We are advocating for parents, random parents not to have the ability under the guise of keeping kids safe to try and challenge the world view of every single manner on these issues," Giannoulias said.

Earlier this year, Illinois passed a first-of-its kind law that bars public libraries from receiving state funding beginning in 2024 if they ban books because of "partisan or doctrinal" issues.
This screaming over banning books in Florida (and other states) schools is really a bunch of bullshit.
Who gets to decide what is banned? And why is a book banned?
And if a kid really wants to read a banned book then why doesn't he/she beg the parents to buy it from Amazon books?

I think Sen John Kennedy is doing the country a service by letting the country know why certain books should be kept from young children. If the kid wants to learn about perverted sex acts then he/she should go to the parents and ask for clarification.
What good are parents if they can't answer the tough questions for kids?
 
Kennedy is a clown.
If the clownish scum of the American Right would just show a tiny bit of intellectual capability and sense of integrity and morality every once in a while...

...I might be willing to listen to their suggestions on what should or should not be done in our country.

But since that is never going to happen, I am almost forced to reject anything they come up with...no matter that it might contain a decent element.
 
Notice this quote from Durban from the article.. he's claiming if a book that is erotic , one parent cant tell another parent not to let their child read it
That's wrong. and the mechanism to make these standards is the school board. The librarians are only the staff, they have no editorial control of material
Judiciary Chairman Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said both "no one" is advocating for sexually explicit material for children, and that it’s "a distraction from the real challenge."

"I understand and respect that parents may choose to limit what their children read, especially at younger ages. My wife and I did. Others do, too. But no parent should have the right to tell another parent’s child what they can and cannot read in school or at home," he said.
Kennedy repeatedly asked progressive student activist Cameron Samuels — who uses they/them pronouns — whether parents should have any say in what books make it onto the shelves of public libraries.

One of those books Kennedy read from, "All Boys Aren’t Blue" by George M. Johnson, has been banned in at least 29 local school districts and includes a graphic description of anal sex and other activities.

"I put some lube on and got him on his knees, and I began to slide into him from behind," Kennedy read from the book, which is a memoir of Johnson’s life. "I pulled out of him and kissed him while he masturbated."

Samuels, co-founder of Students Engaged Texas, said of the book that if students can’t read books like "All Boys Aren’t Blue," then "they cannot learn about abuse." The activist added the book "isn’t erotic" and that parents should collaborate with educators.

"None of you want to answer my question, you come here, and you say censorship is bad, and of course it's bad. But… you heard the books we're talking about," Kennedy said. "So, tell me what you want, who gets to decide, and all I've heard is it’s the librarians and parents have nothing to do with it.

Before questioning Samuels, the GOP leader turned to Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias and asked whether whether only librarians should make decisions on book selections.

"We are advocating for parents, random parents not to have the ability under the guise of keeping kids safe to try and challenge the world view of every single manner on these issues," Giannoulias said.

Earlier this year, Illinois passed a first-of-its kind law that bars public libraries from receiving state funding beginning in 2024 if they ban books because of "partisan or doctrinal" issues.
What is the fascination of the gop with others sex lives? Why does the gop think they have the authority to dictate to others what's good for them and what's bad for them? If it's because they are claiming the moral high ground, just look at their number one choice for president, to tell you about their morals.
 
When we ban books in school before we ban guns, we admit we are more afraid of our children learning than we are of them dying.

Banning books is the stuff of the most ignorant societies.
Yep.

Last I checked, books didn’t kill kids in classrooms - that was guns.

The Reich wing faux outrage over a non-threatening topic is well noted at this point.

They’re perfectly fine with our kids being collateral damage to their worship of the 2A altar.

They’re PETRIFIED that kids can read and learn about things they personally object to though.

Strange world indeed.
 
What is the fascination of the gop with others sex lives?
Why are liberals and progressives publishing their sex lives in the form of child smut and insisting that children read it? It takes a really depraved mind to write child pornography and demand that school libraries stock it.
 
The GOP has no policy platform beyond anti-abortion and anti-LBGTQ, ergo their "woke" crusade and banning books.

They're like little Nazis running around and tossing books onto a bonfire.
 
The GOP has no policy platform beyond anti-abortion and anti-LBGTQ, ergo their "woke" crusade and banning books.

They're like little Nazis running around and tossing books onto a bonfire.
Yep.

They know they screwed themselves by overturning Roe.

So they are DESPERATE to create a narrative that appeals to suburbanites in order to try to prevent a complete landslide at the polls.

This one isn’t gaining nearly enough traction though. The vast majority of parents realize books aren’t a threat to their kids - guns and school shootings are.
 
Why are liberals and progressives publishing their sex lives in the form of child smut and insisting that children read it? It takes a really depraved mind to write child pornography and demand that school libraries stock it.
If you don't like what's on tv, change the channel, don't tell me I can't watch it. Insisting, really?
 
Why are liberals and progressives publishing their sex lives in the form of child smut and insisting that children read it? It takes a really depraved mind to write child pornography and demand that school libraries stock it.
Yawn.

Meanwhile, we have our first actual dead student of the 2023-2024 school year.

Want to take a wild guess what killed them?

(Hint: it wasn’t a book)
 
Notice this quote from Durban from the article.. he's claiming if a book that is erotic , one parent cant tell another parent not to let their child read it
That's wrong. and the mechanism to make these standards is the school board. The librarians are only the staff, they have no editorial control of material
Judiciary Chairman Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said both "no one" is advocating for sexually explicit material for children, and that it’s "a distraction from the real challenge."

"I understand and respect that parents may choose to limit what their children read, especially at younger ages. My wife and I did. Others do, too. But no parent should have the right to tell another parent’s child what they can and cannot read in school or at home," he said.
Kennedy repeatedly asked progressive student activist Cameron Samuels — who uses they/them pronouns — whether parents should have any say in what books make it onto the shelves of public libraries.

One of those books Kennedy read from, "All Boys Aren’t Blue" by George M. Johnson, has been banned in at least 29 local school districts and includes a graphic description of anal sex and other activities.

"I put some lube on and got him on his knees, and I began to slide into him from behind," Kennedy read from the book, which is a memoir of Johnson’s life. "I pulled out of him and kissed him while he masturbated."

Samuels, co-founder of Students Engaged Texas, said of the book that if students can’t read books like "All Boys Aren’t Blue," then "they cannot learn about abuse." The activist added the book "isn’t erotic" and that parents should collaborate with educators.

"None of you want to answer my question, you come here, and you say censorship is bad, and of course it's bad. But… you heard the books we're talking about," Kennedy said. "So, tell me what you want, who gets to decide, and all I've heard is it’s the librarians and parents have nothing to do with it.

Before questioning Samuels, the GOP leader turned to Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias and asked whether whether only librarians should make decisions on book selections.

"We are advocating for parents, random parents not to have the ability under the guise of keeping kids safe to try and challenge the world view of every single manner on these issues," Giannoulias said.

Earlier this year, Illinois passed a first-of-its kind law that bars public libraries from receiving state funding beginning in 2024 if they ban books because of "partisan or doctrinal" issues.

Kennedy really nailed it. We're hoping we can get this as an audio book.

So nice of this United States Senator to take a break from the pressing issues of the day to indulge us in this.
 
Why are liberals and progressives publishing their sex lives in the form of child smut and insisting that children read it? It takes a really depraved mind to write child pornography and demand that school libraries stock it.

A vast left-wing conspiracy is it?

Thoughtful commentary on this site is really going down the tubes.
 
Right-wing conservatives want the state to control their kids because they, apparently can't do it themselves.

Meanwhile, there is no record of this book in a library having a deleterious effect on anyone.
 
When we ban books in school before we ban guns, we admit we are more afraid of our children learning than we are of them dying.

Banning books is the stuff of the most ignorant societies.
Banning bad books is a great thing.
 
Notice this quote from Durban from the article.. he's claiming if a book that is erotic , one parent cant tell another parent not to let their child read it
That's wrong. and the mechanism to make these standards is the school board. The librarians are only the staff, they have no editorial control of material
Judiciary Chairman Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said both "no one" is advocating for sexually explicit material for children, and that it’s "a distraction from the real challenge."

"I understand and respect that parents may choose to limit what their children read, especially at younger ages. My wife and I did. Others do, too. But no parent should have the right to tell another parent’s child what they can and cannot read in school or at home," he said.
Kennedy repeatedly asked progressive student activist Cameron Samuels — who uses they/them pronouns — whether parents should have any say in what books make it onto the shelves of public libraries.

One of those books Kennedy read from, "All Boys Aren’t Blue" by George M. Johnson, has been banned in at least 29 local school districts and includes a graphic description of anal sex and other activities.

"I put some lube on and got him on his knees, and I began to slide into him from behind," Kennedy read from the book, which is a memoir of Johnson’s life. "I pulled out of him and kissed him while he masturbated."

Samuels, co-founder of Students Engaged Texas, said of the book that if students can’t read books like "All Boys Aren’t Blue," then "they cannot learn about abuse." The activist added the book "isn’t erotic" and that parents should collaborate with educators.

"None of you want to answer my question, you come here, and you say censorship is bad, and of course it's bad. But… you heard the books we're talking about," Kennedy said. "So, tell me what you want, who gets to decide, and all I've heard is it’s the librarians and parents have nothing to do with it.

Before questioning Samuels, the GOP leader turned to Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias and asked whether whether only librarians should make decisions on book selections.

"We are advocating for parents, random parents not to have the ability under the guise of keeping kids safe to try and challenge the world view of every single manner on these issues," Giannoulias said.

Earlier this year, Illinois passed a first-of-its kind law that bars public libraries from receiving state funding beginning in 2024 if they ban books because of "partisan or doctrinal" issues.

Do you have any source from reputable media?
 
It should stop with this

Judiciary Chairman Dick Durbin, D-Ill.,...

I understand and respect that parents may choose to limit what their children read, especially at younger ages. My wife and I did. Others do, too. But no parent should have the right to tell another parent’s child what they can and cannot read in school or at home," he said.
 
OH NO IT'S TOO GRAPHIC

-Boomers whose kids have had Internet access to porn since they were 12

More offended by sex than white supremacy and fascism, that's what the modern GOP is.
 
Do you have any source from reputable media?
Kids do not really matter...or really matter a lot...to those people.

As has been noted, they want to protect the kids from books...but not from guns.

A corollary of that can easily be found by asking one of the rich ones about the costs they incur caring for their money...versus the costs they incur caring for their kids.
'
The will spend a fortune on accountants, lawyers, and financial advisors to care for their money...

...and hire illegals at below minimum wages to care for their kids.

Test it if you think that is not so.
 
Back
Top Bottom