- Joined
- Aug 11, 2005
- Messages
- 2,231
- Reaction score
- 129
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Did “Able Danger” have more evidence, prosecutable evidence, against the 911 plotters in 2000 than our troops had against those they rounded up on the battlefield?
Is the British release of the “spiritual advisor” of Osama, deporting him, the same kind of mistake?
Considering the terrorist tape of the guy from down under that was released recently, I would like everyone to eat their Greens:
“Those who desire to face up to the Zionists conspiracies, intransigence, and aggressiveness must proceed towards the advance centers of capabilities in the greater Arab homeland and to the centers of the knowledge, honesty and sincerity with whole heartiness if the aim was to implement a serious plan to save others from their dilemma or to rely on those capable centers; well-known for their positions regarding the enemy, to gain precise concessions from it with justified maneuvers even if such centers including Baghdad not in agreement with those concerned, over the objectives and aims of the required maneuvers." (On the 29th anniversary of Iraq’s national day (the 17th of July 1968 revolution). President Saddam Hussein made an important comprehensive and nation wide address) http://southmovement.alphalink.com.au/countries/Iraq/speech.htm
What well-known group, that “liberals” have harped endlessly was not in agreement with Baghdad, had a “serious plan” in 1997? Do you believe those maneuvers that Saddam was talking about were going to be according to the rules of warfare? Especially considering the February 23, 1998 fatwa, is it really illogical to believe that it was an Al Quacka that Saddam was inviting to Baghdad? I do not expect an ambushing creed and their sympathizers to be honest and straightforward.
“Again we say that when someone feels that he is unjustly treated, and no one is repulsing or stopping the injustice inflicted on him, he personally seeks ways and means for lifting that justice. Of course, not everyone is capable of finding the best way for lifting the injustice inflicted on him. People resort to what they think is the best way according to their own ideas, and they are not all capable of reaching out for what is beyond what is available to arrive to the best idea or means.
To find the best way, after having found their way to God and His rights, those who are inflicted by injustice need not to be isolated from their natural milieu, or be ignored deliberately, or as a result of mis-appreciation, by the officials in this milieu. They should, rather, be reassured and helped to save themselves, and their surroundings.” (Saddam Hussein Shabban 13, 1422 H. October 29, 2001.)
Understanding why people do things is one thing, supporting the conclusion is another. Who are the magical mis-appreciated “they” that Saddam said should be helped to save themselves and their surroundings? Al Quacka and the Taliban surroundings should be obvious…why is your knee jerking? Remember what he was responding to. We have all heard the “liberals” claim that Saddam and Osama did not like each other! Saddam was secular…say that “God is Great” three times and see if I hear you. Who is the milieu? Is it logical to suspect he was talking about an Al Quacka and the Saudi type milieu that sent Osama into exile?
Dear Saddam, which came first the chicken or the egg? Did you say that the terrorists who did the calculations are increasing in number?
“Hundreds of people used to doubt you and few only would follow you until this huge event happened. Now hundreds of people are coming out to join you. I remember a vision by Shaykh Salih Al-((Shuaybi)). He said: “ will be a great hit and people will go out by hundreds to Afghanistan.” I asked him (Salih): “ Afghanistan?” He replied, “” According to him, the only ones who stay behind will be the mentally impotent and the liars (hypocrites). I remembered his saying that hundreds of people will go out to Afghanistan. He had this vision a year ago. This event discriminated between the different types of followers.
UBL: (...Inaudible...) we calculated in advance the number of casualties from the enemy, who would be killed based on the position of the tower. We calculated that the floors that would be hit would be three or four floors. I was the most optimistic of them all. (...Inaudible...) due to my experience in this field, I was thinking that the fire from the gas in the plane would melt the iron structure of the building and collapse the area where the plane hit and all the floors above it only. This is all that we had hoped for.” http://www.fas.org/irp/world/para/ubl-video.html (December 13, 2001 TRANSCRIPT OF USAMA BIN LADEN VIDEO TAPE)
“The world focused its full attention on the analysis and follow up of the events of last September, but those who made an in-depth analysis may have not been the majority of the people. Nevertheless, it seems to us that they have, now, increased in number.” (Saddam Hussein Shabban 13, 1422 H. October 29, 2001.)
Dear Saddam, I know who you think increased in number but what in-depth analysis are you talking about there?
“The victory of the US and its allies over Iraq would conceal the opposing attitude and analysis, and would not allow it to emerge again for a long time.” (Saddam Hussein Shabban 13, 1422 H. October 29, 2001.)
Yeah, that is what I thought.
Is the British release of the “spiritual advisor” of Osama, deporting him, the same kind of mistake?
Considering the terrorist tape of the guy from down under that was released recently, I would like everyone to eat their Greens:
“Those who desire to face up to the Zionists conspiracies, intransigence, and aggressiveness must proceed towards the advance centers of capabilities in the greater Arab homeland and to the centers of the knowledge, honesty and sincerity with whole heartiness if the aim was to implement a serious plan to save others from their dilemma or to rely on those capable centers; well-known for their positions regarding the enemy, to gain precise concessions from it with justified maneuvers even if such centers including Baghdad not in agreement with those concerned, over the objectives and aims of the required maneuvers." (On the 29th anniversary of Iraq’s national day (the 17th of July 1968 revolution). President Saddam Hussein made an important comprehensive and nation wide address) http://southmovement.alphalink.com.au/countries/Iraq/speech.htm
What well-known group, that “liberals” have harped endlessly was not in agreement with Baghdad, had a “serious plan” in 1997? Do you believe those maneuvers that Saddam was talking about were going to be according to the rules of warfare? Especially considering the February 23, 1998 fatwa, is it really illogical to believe that it was an Al Quacka that Saddam was inviting to Baghdad? I do not expect an ambushing creed and their sympathizers to be honest and straightforward.
“Again we say that when someone feels that he is unjustly treated, and no one is repulsing or stopping the injustice inflicted on him, he personally seeks ways and means for lifting that justice. Of course, not everyone is capable of finding the best way for lifting the injustice inflicted on him. People resort to what they think is the best way according to their own ideas, and they are not all capable of reaching out for what is beyond what is available to arrive to the best idea or means.
To find the best way, after having found their way to God and His rights, those who are inflicted by injustice need not to be isolated from their natural milieu, or be ignored deliberately, or as a result of mis-appreciation, by the officials in this milieu. They should, rather, be reassured and helped to save themselves, and their surroundings.” (Saddam Hussein Shabban 13, 1422 H. October 29, 2001.)
Understanding why people do things is one thing, supporting the conclusion is another. Who are the magical mis-appreciated “they” that Saddam said should be helped to save themselves and their surroundings? Al Quacka and the Taliban surroundings should be obvious…why is your knee jerking? Remember what he was responding to. We have all heard the “liberals” claim that Saddam and Osama did not like each other! Saddam was secular…say that “God is Great” three times and see if I hear you. Who is the milieu? Is it logical to suspect he was talking about an Al Quacka and the Saudi type milieu that sent Osama into exile?
Dear Saddam, which came first the chicken or the egg? Did you say that the terrorists who did the calculations are increasing in number?
“Hundreds of people used to doubt you and few only would follow you until this huge event happened. Now hundreds of people are coming out to join you. I remember a vision by Shaykh Salih Al-((Shuaybi)). He said: “ will be a great hit and people will go out by hundreds to Afghanistan.” I asked him (Salih): “ Afghanistan?” He replied, “” According to him, the only ones who stay behind will be the mentally impotent and the liars (hypocrites). I remembered his saying that hundreds of people will go out to Afghanistan. He had this vision a year ago. This event discriminated between the different types of followers.
UBL: (...Inaudible...) we calculated in advance the number of casualties from the enemy, who would be killed based on the position of the tower. We calculated that the floors that would be hit would be three or four floors. I was the most optimistic of them all. (...Inaudible...) due to my experience in this field, I was thinking that the fire from the gas in the plane would melt the iron structure of the building and collapse the area where the plane hit and all the floors above it only. This is all that we had hoped for.” http://www.fas.org/irp/world/para/ubl-video.html (December 13, 2001 TRANSCRIPT OF USAMA BIN LADEN VIDEO TAPE)
“The world focused its full attention on the analysis and follow up of the events of last September, but those who made an in-depth analysis may have not been the majority of the people. Nevertheless, it seems to us that they have, now, increased in number.” (Saddam Hussein Shabban 13, 1422 H. October 29, 2001.)
Dear Saddam, I know who you think increased in number but what in-depth analysis are you talking about there?
“The victory of the US and its allies over Iraq would conceal the opposing attitude and analysis, and would not allow it to emerge again for a long time.” (Saddam Hussein Shabban 13, 1422 H. October 29, 2001.)
Yeah, that is what I thought.