- Joined
- Jan 28, 2013
- Messages
- 94,823
- Reaction score
- 28,342
- Location
- Williamsburg, Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
This is not a surprising result. If workers cost more then employers will hire fewer of them.
When Seattle officials voted three years ago to incrementally boost the city's minimum wage up to $15 an hour, they'd hoped to improve the lives of low-income workers. Yet according to a major new study that could force economists to reassess past research on the issue, the hike has had the opposite effect.
The city is gradually increasing the hourly minimum to $15 over several years. Already, though, some employers have not been able to afford the increased minimums. They've cut their payrolls, putting off new hiring, reducing hours or letting their workers go, the study found.
The costs to low-wage workers in Seattle outweighed the benefits by a ratio of three to one, according to the study, conducted by a group of economists at the University of Washington who were commissioned by the city. The study, published as a working paper Monday by the National Bureau of Economic Research, has not yet been peer reviewed.On the whole, the study estimates, the average low-wage worker in the city lost $125 a month because of the hike in the minimum.
The paper's conclusions contradict years of research on the minimum wage. Many past studies, by contrast, have found that the benefits of increases for low-wage workers exceed the costs in terms of reduced employment -- often by a factor of four or five to one.
"This strikes me as a study that is likely to influence people," said David Autor, an economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who was not involved in the research. He called the work "very credible" and "sufficiently compelling in its design and statistical power that it can change minds." . . .
There's a bit more to it that all that, I fear.
The City Knew the Bad Minimum Wage Report Was Coming Out, So It Called Up Berkeley | Seattle Weekly
Two years after Seattle began increasing its minimum wage (for most businesses with 500 or more employees, it’s headed to $15 an hour next year), Seattle’s economy is as strong as ever. The Seattle unemployment rate in April, for example, was 2.6 percent, the lowest it has been in nine years.
First, their data exclude workers at businesses that have more than one location; in other words, while workers at a standalone mom-and-pop restaurant show up in their results, workers at Starbucks and McDonald’s don’t.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...lly-working-just-fine/?utm_term=.87f104b80706
Wait what?
And another study shows pretty much the opposite?
http://irle.berkeley.edu/files/2017/Seattles-Minimum-Wage-Experiences-2015-16.pdf
So which has more validity? Well not the OP one if this is true..
That is 40% of businesses they just exclude? And then they also dont provide their whole data set .. err why is that?
Funny thing about "higher minimum wage"... means people suddenly have more money and they actually use said money, that stimulates the economy.... who would have thought that?
I suggest you review the link provided in #4. The Berkeley study was was a rush-job of political first-aid requested by Seattle's mayor when he found out the researchers Seattle had engaged were bringing out a negative report.
Yes so claim the anti-high minimum wage crowd. Still does not change the fact that the OP study does not provide all data sets and control sets, but most worryingly, excludes multi-location businesses... why? That would be like saying teen pregnancy in the US is low because we only surveyed whites in areas of the US that have incomes over 50k... I mean wtf?
From the link:
. . . And critics of the research pointed out what they saw as serious shortcomings. In particular, to avoid confusing establishments that were subject to the minimum with those that were not, the authors did not include large employers with locations both inside and outside of Seattle in their calculations. Skeptics argued that omission could explain the unusual results.
"Like, whoa, what? Where did you get this?" asked Ben Zipperer, an economist at the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute (EPI) in Washington.
"My view of the research is that it seems to work," he said. "The minimum wage in general seems to do exactly what it’s intended to do, and that’s to raise wages for low-wage workers, with little negative consequence in terms of job loss."
Economists might not readily dismiss the new study as an outlier, however. The paper published Monday makes use of more detailed data than have been available in past research, drawing on state records of wages and hours for individual employees.
As a result, the paper is likely to upend a debate that has continued among economists, politicians, businesses and labor organizers for decades. In particular, the results could exacerbate divisions among Democrats, who are seeking an economic agenda to counter President Trump's pitches for protectionism, reduced taxes and restrictions on immigration. . . .
Yes yes we know, the paper will be used by the corporatists to try to put slavery back on the table... after all people should not be allowed to make a living that they actually can live off!!!
Still does not change the fact, the study has massive flaws and was designed to prove that higher minimum wage is bad.
There is no evidence the study was "designed" with any outcome in mind. That is just your ideological propaganda spin. Please keep in mind these are the researchers hired by the city of Seattle to track the impact of the increased minimum wage.
"Still does not change the fact, the study has massive flaws and was designed to prove that higher minimum wage is bad."
Jack - do you think he applied the same crtitical standard to the Card- Krueger since they are liberals and in Krueger case a liberal Democrat?
Apparently the mayor will keep asking for academics' views until he finds one he likes. Ironic that he's looking for counters to the views of the people he himself originally engaged.
There is no evidence the study was "designed" with any outcome in mind. That is just your ideological propaganda spin. Please keep in mind these are the researchers hired by the city of Seattle to track the impact of the increased minimum wage.
From the report: "The study, published as a working paper Monday by the National Bureau of Economic Research, has not yet been peer reviewed."
Are you still a big supporter of "Trickle Down" Reaganomics?
I suggest you review the link provided in #4. The Berkeley study was was a rush-job of political first-aid requested by Seattle's mayor when he found out the researchers Seattle had engaged were bringing out a negative report.
I would say I'm a supporter of whatever works.
Sounds deceptively reaganish.
Thank you for the compliment.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?