- Joined
- Jan 10, 2015
- Messages
- 14,012
- Reaction score
- 3,439
- Location
- Southern Oregon
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Hopefully everybody remember Sallenger’s “hot spots” of sea level acceleration along the East Coast of the US. Asbury H. Sallenger Jr, Kara S. Doran & Peter A. Howd, Hotspot of accelerated sea-level rise on the Atlantic coast of North America, Nature Climate Change 2, 884–888 (2012), doi:10.1038/nclimate1597 This was one of the many examples of bad science misinterpreting the sea level oscillations by cherry picking the time window. As 6 more years of data have been collected, let see if the hotspots are now the “hottest on record” or if they have cooled down.
Actually the bad science and cherry picking is on the deniers side of the equation. Sea levels do fluctuate but the trend is and will continue to be a slow rise. Right now Australia is experiencing a rainy period and lakes that are normally dry salt beds are 75% full. A convergence in the South Pacific is concentrating some rainfall.
But nice try...eace
And I maintain, as I always have that Climate Change/GW pushers, all have an agenda. Follow the money! Algore is making a fortune off of his BS, and the govt. gets to control more people, with fear tactics.
The Earth will do what it wants to do and man has no real control over her. The folly......................is in the fear mongering, because the earth will cycle in and out and all about......................on it's own.
And I maintain, as I always have that Climate Change/GW pushers, all have an agenda. Follow the money! Algore is making a fortune off of his BS, and the govt. gets to control more people, with fear tactics.
The Earth will do what it wants to do and man has no real control over her. The folly......................is in the fear mongering, because the earth will cycle in and out and all about......................on it's own.
And I maintain, as I always have that Climate Change/GW pushers, all have an agenda. Follow the money! Algore is making a fortune off of his BS, and the govt. gets to control more people, with fear tactics.
The Earth will do what it wants to do and man has no real control over her. The folly......................is in the fear mongering, because the earth will cycle in and out and all about......................on it's own.
Follow the money! Financial interests only exist on one side of this argument!
I tend to stay out of these debates because I don't have the time or patience to sift through all the science and pseudo-science both sides spew back and forth. But "follow the money"? Come on, man. Which side, by FAR, has the most money riding on this issue?
And I maintain, as I always have that Climate Change/GW pushers, all have an agenda. Follow the money! Algore is making a fortune off of his BS, and the govt. gets to control more people, with fear tactics. The Earth will do what it wants to do and man has no real control over her. The folly......................is in the fear mongering, because the earth will cycle in and out and all about......................on it's own.
Right, because climate alarmists work for free. And government backed "green" energy schemes are an illusion.
You do know there are Experts that do not accept the published rate of sea level rise.Ahhh yes, no doubt more intel you gleaned while working for that agency that 'doesn't exist'...
Yes it's all to make Al gore rich... :lamo
never mind there are truly informed experts who can explain the sea level fluctuations- it's all a big hoax to control us all....eace
Right, because climate alarmists work for free. And government backed "green" energy schemes are an illusion.
Follow the money! Financial interests only exist on one side of this argument!
I tend to stay out of these debates because I don't have the time or patience to sift through all the science and pseudo-science both sides spew back and forth. But "follow the money"? Come on, man. Which side, by FAR, has the most money riding on this issue?
Right, because climate alarmists work for free. And government backed "green" energy schemes are an illusion.
The UN, and it's various offshoots are looking for something along the lines of $20 trillion dollars. Scientists and others are looking for billions.
United Nations and Climate Change
Forbes Welcome
So tell me, what side has money on it's side and in it's eyes?
And this, my friend, is what we call a "false choice."
You responded to a post that insinuated the anti-warming side of the debate has more money funneled into it than the warming side by insinuating that must mean that folks on the warming side are receiving zero money.
Hopefully everybody remember Sallenger’s “hot spots” of sea level acceleration along the East Coast of the US.
Asbury H. Sallenger Jr, Kara S. Doran & Peter A. Howd, Hotspot of accelerated sea-level rise on the Atlantic coast of North America, Nature Climate Change 2, 884–888 (2012), doi:10.1038/nclimate1597
This was one of the many examples of bad science misinterpreting the sea level oscillations by cherry picking the time window.
As 6 more years of data have been collected, let see if the hotspots are now the “hottest on record” or if they have cooled down.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/05...s-of-acceleration-of-washington-and-new-york/
One thing we skeptics know is that a warmist can explain away everything .Ahhh yes, no doubt more intel you gleaned while working for that agency that 'doesn't exist'...
Yes it's all to make Al gore rich... :lamo
never mind there are truly informed experts who can explain the sea level fluctuations- it's all a big hoax to control us all....eace
One thing we skeptics know is that a warmist can explain away everything .
Oh wait, did I say skeptics? I forgot-the order went out to call us deniers.
The Associated Press wants reporters to stop calling people ?climate deniers? : TreeHugger
LAFFRIOT
I agree skeptic isn't the correct word either, but it works for lack of a better one.
Science is all about being skeptical. It is those scientists trying to shut down "skeptics" that are discrediting their field.
Yes. Precisely. Exactly.
Skeptic should be assumed for anybody working in a filed as complicated as climate science, where there are so many unknowns.
The lack of the skepticism that exists is indicative of how much the agenda is driven by politics.
Do tell! what is the "one thing" that science is saying?That's why 'denier' is such an appropriate word.
Science clearly is saying one thing, and you guys are not only denying they are saying those things, you're denying that those things are good science. Look to IPCC discussions in this forum for a reference point.
Denier.
The lack of the skepticism that exists is indicative of how much the agenda is driven by politics.
Oh go blow it out your...That's why 'denier' is such an appropriate word.
Science clearly is saying one thing, and you guys are not only denying they are saying those things, you're denying that those things are good science. Look to IPCC discussions in this forum for a reference point.
Denier.
I tend to stay out of these debates because I don't have the time or patience to sift through all the science and pseudo-science both sides spew back and forth. But "follow the money"? Come on, man. Which side, by FAR, has the most money riding on this issue?
Oh go blow it out your...
I'm sick and tired of your blind following of the dogma.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?