• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

SCOTUS said that the 2nd amendment allowed people to use guns for self defense

Fledermaus said:
Strike sixteen.

What does "for cause" mean?
Click to expand...

The unemployment insurance code at 1256 is an example of extra-legal for-cause criteria in an at-will employment State. No agency of any State, nor the State, nor the Union have any authority to deny or disparage, social equality of outcomes concerning at-will employment.
 
danielpalos said:
The unemployment insurance code at 1256 is an example of extra-legal for-cause criteria in an at-will employment State. No agency of any State, nor the State, nor the Union have any authority to deny or disparage, social equality of outcomes concerning at-will employment.
Click to expand...

Concept salad. And there is no "for-cause" requirement in an "at-will" state.

Strike seventeen.

What does "for cause" mean?

Your use indicates you do not know.
 
danielpalos said:
For-cause is meaningless in an at-will employment State unless you have for-Cause employment.
Click to expand...

Strike eighteen.

For-cause is important. But it isn't required. There is no "for-cause" employment.

danielpalos said:
EDD must prove for-cause employment in any at-will employment State.
Click to expand...

There is no "for-cause" employment.

For-cause applies to non at-will states as well.

What does "for cause" mean?
 
What insults? I am bearing true witness, unlike You; anybody can tell that you have no argument only diversion and appeals to ignorance.
 
danielpalos said:
You are clueless and Causeless. I gave you several examples previously. You are just trolling. Nobody can be that ignorant of plain reason even without legal axioms.
Click to expand...

Strike twenty-one.

No you didn't.

No where did you define "for-cause".

Improper use (examples) of the term isn't defining it.
 
Fledermaus said:
Strike twenty-one.

No you didn't.

No where did you define "for-cause".

Improper use (examples) of the term isn't defining it.
Click to expand...

LoL. Like You would know when all You do is appeal to ignorance. Explain how I am using the term improperly. Go ahead and read our discussion. From my perspective, you are simply trolling and practicing the abomination of hypocrisy (unto a God) instead of trying to be more holy and more moral by resorting to the fewest fallacies. Only the immoral and unethical "double down on the turpitude of fallacy."

The unemployment insurance code which denies and disparages our privileges and immunities regarding the whole and entire concept of employment at the will of either party.

Employment is at the will of either party for unemployment compensation as well; since, equality of outcomes is what we want. Either way, Capital circulates under our form of Capitalism. Problem solved. Only the right wing trolls with no solutions.
 
danielpalos said:
LoL. Like You would know when all You do is appeal to ignorance. Explain how I am using the term improperly. Go ahead and read our discussion. From my perspective, you are simply trolling and practicing the abomination of hypocrisy (unto a God) instead of trying to be more holy and more moral by resorting to the fewest fallacies. Only the immoral and unethical "double down on the turpitude of fallacy."

The unemployment insurance code which denies and disparages our privileges and immunities regarding the whole and entire concept of employment at the will of either party.

Employment is at the will of either party for unemployment compensation as well; since, equality of outcomes is what we want. Either way, Capital circulates under our form of Capitalism. Problem solved. Only the right wing trolls with no solutions.
Click to expand...

A long rambling post that does nothing to answer the question.

What does "for-cause" mean?
 
Fledermaus said:
A long rambling post that does nothing to answer the question.

What does "for-cause" mean?
Click to expand...

You should already know what it means. Why appeal to ignorance like usual and then "double down like Any practitioner of the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God)? And, don't repeat historical mistakes or fallacies and allege you are not really like that, afterward. Go ahead and explain how my usage of for-cause is incorrect. Or, admit You are simply full of fallacy, like usual when arguing with me and that is why, I don't take You seriously at all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom