- Joined
- May 19, 2006
- Messages
- 156,720
- Reaction score
- 53,497
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I am one person, one opinion, one vote. But many think and feel similarly as I do. I do not presume to speak for anyone else, yet I do speak a concern shared by many millions of americans.
Supreme court justices can ALSO be impeached.
We will have to wait until 2014 to see if wimpy congress gets any courage by infusion of fresh blood.
And yet the MAJORITY of Americans disagree with you. Don't forget that.
And they can be heralded for their excellent service.
Or if Congress has the courage to support brave and intelligent decisions like today's.
Gays can do what they want in the privacy of the bedroom. The problem is they won't let it STAY in the bedroom.
Where in ANY federal or state law is it ok to flaunt sexuality?
Discretion please, and marriage belongs to heterosexuals. Invent something new.
And invent some new words to describe yourself. Rainbow doesn't belong to you, nor gay for that matter. Old Fred Flintstone can't have a gay old time now days.
if you want respect? GIVE SOME!
The supposed majority is 53% + or - 3% on the gallop poll, on a 1500+ sample WEIGHTED as Gallop decided to weight (raw unweighted response not published)
so that's usually called roughly HALF the people, not a CLEAR CONVINCING MAJORITY!
The supposed majority is 53% + or - 3% on the gallop poll, on a 1500+ sample WEIGHTED as Gallop decided to weight (raw unweighted response not published)
so that's usually called roughly HALF the people, not a CLEAR CONVINCING MAJORITY!
I don't want respect from someone like you, at all. In fact, count your blessings that 17 years of DOMA is not followed by a 17 year ban on hetero marriage. That's frankly what people like you deserve.
Compared to 44% against, far more than half, and I'm guessing you've never taken a basic research class if you think 1500 is not an adequate sample size. Give it up. Ten years ago it was at 30% for. This is a consensus that national gay marriage is as inevitable as the hate you represent dying off.
I don't hate homosexuals.
I even understand their point of view that they are as "normal" as anyone else.
I am disgruntled that people who SHOULD know better, fall for it!
Wait... so you admit they are normal but are disgruntled that people fall for... what?
I didn't say they were "normal". Obviously homosexuals are different and NOT normal.
I intended to say, I understand their desire to be accepted as "normal".
I'm appalled at heteros who accept the propaganda that homosexuality is "OKAY".
An old saying. "He who believes in nothing, will fall for anything!"
Statistically, I agree. In any other sense, homosexuals are completely normal.
OK.
Since homosexuality is normal... as proven by research, anyone who accepts this is accepting facts... and anyone who doesn't is denying facts.
That is current liberal social philosophy and heavily published.
Just read the comments:
Is homosexuality normal? - Yahoo! Answers
I can understand the desire to be accepted.
Does ANYONE here understand the "desire" to NOT accept something alien to ALL my beliefs and upbringing?
I suppose you could TRY to make a case, I was reared in an evil hateful culture.
But, as example, for my 4th birthday, I requested to be allowed to go to the movies by myself, since I was a big boy.
The rest of the family could go to a different movie, I wasn't being selfish, just exercising cutting a few apron strings.
My parents let me, and it was a successful adventure. (1952)
Who in their right mind would let a 4 year old go to the movies alone today?
It was a BETTER time. A BETTER culture!
People were MORE civilized and all that has passed,
and "accepting" homosexuality is as VERY CLEAR SYMPTOM of a world gone awry!
Ten Signs of a Culture's End
Ten Signs of a Culture's End
Actually, it's accurate based on plenty of research that some conservatives just deny... even though these conservatives have no facts to support them
Irrelevant opinions that have no basis in reality. I deal with facts. The above has none.
Au contraire.
I just gave you a whole BUNCH of facts.
That you CHOOSE not to accept.
So YOU are self relegated to the SAME status as you accord me.
An inconsequential lone opinion of denial.
You gave me no facts. You gave me the opinions of a bunch of people with no substantiation. Facts are supported by research and data. You provided none. I have facts. You do not. If you believe you do, show me some reliable and credible research that shows that homosexuality is NOT normal. Links are required. Opinions without research are not relevant.
I said in more than one post, that acceptance of homosexuality is a symptom concurrent with and predictive of a civilizations fall.
"Those who don't study history, are doomed to repeat it."
The topic 'Civilization Decline' is as important as any OTHER field of study, and much has been written about it over the centuries.
"That thing we call civilization is the tangible expression of a society's intelligence; what is decaying in our community is our mental powers; as individuals, as groups, as communities, we are losing the ability to think clearly. Naturally as our perception decays so does the effectiveness of our administration and the impact of our technology — our strength and understanding. Discovering why a civilization rises and falls, is learning how a society gains then loses comprehension. "
What is declining when a civilization declines (November 2001)
The dumbing down of America is REAL!
An article written by someone with no research or substantiation is meaningless. Post a study that shows that homosexuality is abnormal and you will have something to discuss. So far, you have produced nothing of substance.
Of course you want to dictate what I should post.
I can find 'experts" from earlier times but your response likely will be, disproved by "modern" research.
My point isn't about the psychology of homosexuals. whether or not they can function responsibly in society.
My argument is, what happens, has ALWAYS happened, to societies that DID and WHEN it accepted homosexuality.
I don't hate homosexuals.
I HATE that a society, our country, a civilization of great merit now ENDORSES homosexuality, to it's ruin.
The standards of marriage have been modified to include SS couples and nothing else. Any arguments against polygamy and incest that existed before SSM are still valid now. You are making a strawman argument because you have nothing.
You do have a right to be angry, but your anger is no justification for disallowing SSM. You are going to have to come up with a better argument than that.
And multiple polls show this, it is a well known fact that this country is for SSM.
You can kill babies for convenience, but not criminals in self defense.
#libtardlogic
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?