- Joined
- Apr 24, 2005
- Messages
- 10,320
- Reaction score
- 2,116
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
danarhea said:I agree with all 3 statements you have made.
In regard to your first statement, Rice doesnt need to be in a kitchen. She is a pragmatist, as opposed to a Neocon, and she is doing a good job, in fact, such a good job that she has been able to effectively neuter Donald Rumsfeld in foreign policy matters.
You obviously don't know anything about that Mission Accomplished banner. Seems as if you ought to go educate yourself.KidRocks said:President Bush, beneath "Mission Accomplished" banner, gives a thumbs-up after declaring an end to major combat in Iraq, May 1, 2003
Calm2Chaos said:WRONG..... from the begining he stated that we would be in this for the long haul. And that this was not going to be a quick fight. Thats another nice little liberal myth
Yep, looks like that to me too!KCConservative said:KidRocks proves my signature every time he posts.
NYStateofMind said:I was also around when we sent in too few troops to protect the supply lines, secure the ammo dumps, provide security, etc, etc, etc...... If we had done it right, MAYBE those rosy predictions would have been more realistic.
I know Bush has a hard time admitting mistakes. Fortunately, I have no problem recognizing them without his help. :mrgreen:
I completely disagree that the war was justified or necessary. That's a whole different discussion though.DivineComedy said:You may be right.
Fine, we didn’t have enough troops, I admit that if Bush can‘t, why do you think people have been screaming that the war is justified from day one, when the other side was yelling that it wasn't, we wanted our side to get help, HELP, to hell with that, it is old news for the next war. Answer me something.
Could you rotate 300, 000 troops, without the problems your memory remembers with less troops, and for how long? Till the Iraqis solve their problems, get a constitution, form an army that never swore an oath to Saddam…
Synch said:Kid, you're going making liberals look stupid with your idiocy...
Continue to not rebuff other people's point, use ad hominems as the base of your arguement, and bashing your opposing objects with wordplay isn't going to win the debate here..
Some of your statements are just false that even a liberal can see that..
And at the OP, you sided with a terrorist organization that kills hundreds of people.... sheesh.
The dress code is a law passed way before the war in iraq for SOTU.
The calls being monitored are international calls..
danarhea said:Hmmm. Nothing about the Iraqi's greeting us with flowers, huh? I can provide the quote and link if you would like. Am just giving you a chance to take back your little attempt to rewrite history.
KidRocks said:President Bush, beneath "Mission Accomplished" banner, gives a thumbs-up after declaring an end to major combat in Iraq, May 1, 2003
NYStateofMind said:You just keep right on trying to rewrite history. Unfortunately, my memory is just fine, and I was around when the claim was made that we would be bringing the majority of the troops home in a few months. I was also around when we sent in too few troops to protect the supply lines, secure the ammo dumps, provide security, etc, etc, etc...... If we had done it right, MAYBE those rosy predictions would have been more realistic.
I know Bush has a hard time admitting mistakes. Fortunately, I have no problem recognizing them without his help. :mrgreen:
KidRocks said:I realize I'm a little rough on the extremists but it's for their own good....
I'm sure they will thank me later when .......
Meanwhile I'll stoop to their level .....
they are like children .....
They have to be carefully weaned ....
KCConservative said:It is your foolish comments that leaves you without any credibility.
I realize I'm a little rough on the extremists but it's for their own good, it's called "tough-love" and I'm sure they will thank me later when they reach maximum development form as mature adults, that is when they will see the errors of their dittohead ways.
Meanwhile I'll stoop to their level as long as it takes. Resorting to ad hominems, bashing and soundbites is what they understand, what they respect, they are like children and I understand their situation.
They have to be carefully weaned from Rush Limbaugh dependency.
We should keep that in mind, before we get involved in another United Nations (of tyrants too) conflict like the “First” Gulf War (which I was against due to it leaving the problem in power), because when something is started we are obligated to try and finish it and not leave the problem to fester under our skin forever, and that goes to justification and necessity, especially considering outcome of Al Quacka’s February 23, 1998 fatwa in anticipation of Clinton’s “wag the dog” of Operation Desert Fox.NYStateofMind said:If there was a problem with sending adequate troops to do the job right, we shouldn't have gone in the first place.
Rewriting history, eh? As I recall, our troops WERE greeted with flowers...danarhea said:Hmmm. Nothing about the Iraqi's greeting us with flowers, huh? I can provide the quote and link if you would like. Am just giving you a chance to take back your little attempt to rewrite history.
battleax86 said:Rewriting history, eh? As I recall, our troops WERE greeted with flowers...
battleax86 said:My guess would be the floral shop...
battleax86 said:Rewriting history, eh? As I recall, our troops WERE greeted with flowers...
Bahahahahahahahahabattleax86 said:Rewriting history, eh? As I recall, our troops WERE greeted with flowers...
KidRocks said:WHERE HAVE ALL THE FLOWERS GONE
words and music by Pete Seeger
performed by Pete Seeger and Tao Rodriguez-Seeger
.
Except for achieving independence, preventing and eventually ending slavery, ending a Nazi state, defeating Japanese imperialism, preventing the spread of communism, liberating over 40 million people in the Muslim world, liberating South Korea, liberating Kuwait, and letting people know that they can't successfully f**k with the United States...yeah, you're right.KidRocks said:War, huh, yeah
What is it good for?
Absolutely (nothing), ah, ha, ha, ha
battleax86 said:Except for achieving independence, preventing and eventually ending slavery, ending a Nazi state, defeating Japanese imperialism, preventing the spread of communism, liberating over 40 million people in the Muslim world, liberating South Korea, liberating Kuwait, and letting people know that they can't successfully f**k with the United States...yeah, you're right.
BTW, thanks for revealing yourself for the peacenik hippy that you are.
battleax86 said:Except for achieving independence, preventing and eventually ending slavery, ending a Nazi state, defeating Japanese imperialism, preventing the spread of communism, liberating over 40 million people in the Muslim world, liberating South Korea, liberating Kuwait, and letting people know that they can't successfully f**k with the United States...yeah, you're right.
BTW, thanks for revealing yourself for the peacenik hippy that you are.
KidRocks said:But look at what we ended up with... President Bush.
Someone who's managing to destroy almost everything we've fought for going back hundreds of years.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?