- Joined
- Sep 19, 2008
- Messages
- 10,177
- Reaction score
- 3,715
- Location
- New England
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I think this is an empty hullabaloo about nothing.
The people protesting it are giving it way more energy and 'legs' than it actually deserves.
Actually, I don't even want the thought planted in a bunch of 4th graders (my kid's class) that some day they could drop out of school. At this age, they're not even thinking about it. So it's pointless and a waste of school time IMO.
They've printed enough 11-by-17-inch copies of the poster to distribute to high school classrooms in the four-largest county districts and are working to raise the final $1,500 to provide larger, 2-by-3-foot posters for common areas in 29 public campuses.
it was historic.Not in my kid's school. For the first time in history, the students were required to watch the inauguration.
Does anyone else find this troubling?
S.J. couple hopes their poster inspires county’s students | Recordnet.com
Does anyone else find this troubling? I don't want a poster of any politician being placed throughout public schools. This is an ad created by democrats and funded by liberal advocacy groups that is being given free space in public schools. Ridiculous.
Also, this is a bit concerning:
I'm not sure what this means as I can't find much information on this topic anywhere else, but what the **** is a "national address to students?" It better not be something that teachers are making kids watch during the school day.
As an aside, these idiots in this article are the most stereotypical pseudo-intellectual dbags imaginable.
You got chills? Really? Get ****ed. And yea, Obama's the first one to value education - it's not like we had a university president with a PhD in office before. :doh
Basically, this is an all-around crock of ****.
it was historic.
So was Powell, and then Rice, did those garner any "historic significance" in our public schools?
So was Powell, and then Rice, did those garner any "historic significance" in our public schools?
I would have no problem if they did. Would you?
At this point, we are desperate, particularly in black, inner city schools, to keep kids motivated to stay in school. Successfully educating young people makes a huge difference in this country's entire economic fortunes.
Anything that encourages kids to stay in school and succeed is okay with me.
Indeed, and we missed a wonderful opportunity IMHO when these two made history, and all becuase they were considered "token conservative".
I personally would love to see posters with both of them encouraging kids to stay in school and study. They are both excellent examples of what people in this country can accomplish, and would love to see inner city kids use them as role models.
Remember the early 80's and Nancy Reagan's just say no anti-drug campaign. Her image was in schools. Who cares?
Yes, I agree, and you could even throw in a few black libertarians, that couldn't hurt either. This is supposed to be about choice, I don't see much choice offered, not at all!
Ummm, hello, you can't swing a cat in an inner city school without hitting an image of Nelson Mandela, Booker T. Washington, or Martin Luther King. Seriously.
You should get out more. This is NORMAL.
They where libertarians? I think the reason you don't see many libertarians in school is because, well, there aren't many libertarians.
Remember the early 80's and Nancy Reagan's just say no anti-drug campaign. Her image was in schools. Who cares?
"Just say no" didn't work, I'm not convinced this waste of resources will work either.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?