Another revelation from the indictment which jumped out at Jamieson was that the Russian hackers had stolen the Clinton campaign’s data analytics and voter-turnout models.
... the disclosure of a top-secret NSA document, details of an intricate plot by Russian military hackers to infiltrate American electoral systems. New emails obtained by The Intercept through public records requests illustrate the disturbing extent to which potential targets of the attack were caught unaware, having apparently remained in the dark alongside the voting public.
... Russia’s efforts to hack the 2016 presidential election were much more widespread than originally thought. The Russian campaign hit 39 states — twice as many as originally reported — and in one case hackers tried to delete and alter voter data.
The Russians didn't rig the elections. They apparently attempting ti influence the elections. Big difference. If anyone rigged the elections it was Hillary and her big, fat, deplorable mouth.
Thank you
The only "rigging" in 2016 was by the DNC.I've already discussed before that it's very likely Russians attempted and succeeded in rigging at least some vote counts in 2016 elections. Recent (accidental) revelations about Manafort sharing proprietary polling data with Russians is just another piece that falls into place here.
We also know Russian hackers stole Clinton's proprietary models as well:
So, how would Russian hackers use these data analytics models from both sides? Why did they really want to have all that info?
Knowing which polling places to target and break into is the most obvious answer IMO.
Then, of course there is this:
and this
etc, etc..
The only "rigging" in 2016 was by the DNC.
Manafort worked with the DNC?...Is this the Russian response?.....
Please show a single vote changed by Manafort sharing PUBLIC POLLING DATA.
Now, review what the DNC's OWN EMAILS taught us about Sanders' fate.
.. Manafort sharing PUBLIC POLLING DATA ...
Why didn't the administration in power retaliate?
There are plenty of potential reasons. There was no sufficient knowledge at the time perhaps. They knew Russians were trying but they did not know the extent or how successful they might be perhaps. Or perhaps they figured Hillary would win despite the attempts?
HOW! DID HE GO TO FUSION OR DID HILLARY R. CLINTON DID!
But in the larger picture Trump played the election game better than Hillary did.
I deleted it to give the author the benefit of a doubt on the limited scope he mentioned of the alleged rigging. But in the larger picture Trump played the election game better than Hillary did.
Or, did they not give a ****, until Clinton didn't turn out to be president?
My theory: they didn't believe Clinton could lose and if they were wrong, they could create the brew-ha-ha we have now to undermine President Trump.
Pretty dick move. Wouldn't you agree?
No, I would not agree. Trump is being investigated thanks only to his own actions. He made his bed.
The investigation started before the election. That's what Peter Strzok meant by an "insurance policy".
Yes, so what? I repeat: Trump is being investigated thanks only to his own actions. He made his bed.
Would you stick to that point if it's proven that Russians changed the critical vote counts? Does "playing the game better" include getting help from another nation to change votes that benefit you? Maybe so...
Are you saying that he directed Manafort to share the polling data with Russian Intelligence?
No. I'm saying selling hats and doing massive meet-and-greets with average working stiffs instead of schmoozing with rich campaign donors in 5-star hotels in New York, Washington, and California was brilliant. :2wave:
I've already discussed before that it's very likely Russians attempted and succeeded in rigging at least some vote counts in 2016 elections. Recent (accidental) revelations about Manafort sharing proprietary polling data with Russians is just another piece that falls into place here.
We also know Russian hackers stole Clinton's proprietary models as well:
So, how would Russian hackers use these data analytics models from both sides? Why did they really want to have all that info?
Knowing which polling places to target and break into is the most obvious answer IMO.
Then, of course there is this:
and this
etc, etc..
What does that have to do with the Trump campaign sharing polling data with Russian Intelligence?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?