- Joined
- Oct 20, 2013
- Messages
- 24,883
- Reaction score
- 10,597
- Location
- daily dukkha
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
China will never stop burning coal <-- you can bookmark that.
China Is Planning 43 New Coal-Fired Power Plants. Can It Still Keep Its Promises to Cut Emissions?
China built three times more new coal power capacity as all other countries in the world combined in 2020.time.com
"Other people make bad decisions so we should also make bad decisions!"so why are we (USA) buying into Paris if India and China are still burning tons of coal?
China gets an exemption for a "developing country?" LMAO @USA dummies & Paris in general <--comment
Sergey Mochalnikov, the head of the Russian Energy Ministry, announced the deal on Friday. The new deal will add to an already lucrative deal Russia signed with India in Nov. 2021 to supply 40 million tons of coal.Russia, China agree new coal deal for 100 million ton supply: state media
A former defense official previously told Fox News Digital that Russia and China's energy relationship could provide economic relief in the event of US sanctions.www.foxnews.com
"Now, an intergovernmental agreement with the People’s Republic of China is being developed and the figure is 100 million tons," he said. "In the coming years, consumers should receive as much coal as they need."
on sanctions ( same link)
"[China] would start buying a lot more energy from Russia," Wilkie explained. "If we went to move on the SWIFT loan system that gives Russia access to western capital, China would pick up the slack with that."
Two commie nations helping each other other, what a surprise.so why are we (USA) buying into Paris if India and China are still burning tons of coal?
China gets an exemption for a "developing country?" LMAO @USA dummies & Paris in general <--comment
Sergey Mochalnikov, the head of the Russian Energy Ministry, announced the deal on Friday. The new deal will add to an already lucrative deal Russia signed with India in Nov. 2021 to supply 40 million tons of coal.Russia, China agree new coal deal for 100 million ton supply: state media
A former defense official previously told Fox News Digital that Russia and China's energy relationship could provide economic relief in the event of US sanctions.www.foxnews.com
"Now, an intergovernmental agreement with the People’s Republic of China is being developed and the figure is 100 million tons," he said. "In the coming years, consumers should receive as much coal as they need."
other people make 'bad decisions' but we pay the penalties by not exporting coal as LNG prices rise"Other people make bad decisions so we should also make bad decisions!"
Excuse me, what?
Germany killed it's nuke program to move to renewables which were utterly insufficient and unreliable-They wouldn’t be able to do it right away because the infrastructure doesn’t exist Yet.
Your posts indicate that Russia is still betting its economic future on continued demand for fossil fuels.
And yet, RussIan and Ukrainian brinksmanship over gas supplies have helped accelerate a drive toward renewables across the Western world.
The crisis that Putin manufactured now, will encourage the EU and the US to double down. China has no intention of being left behind in that race.
This self defeating crisis will serve to add yet another reason for the West ato abandon dependence on untrustworthy suppliers of fossil fuels.
Well, it looks like Russia and China listen to me. I say, use it up and they go ahead.so why are we (USA) buying into Paris if India and China are still burning tons of coal?
China gets an exemption for a "developing country?" LMAO @USA dummies & Paris in general <--comment
Sergey Mochalnikov, the head of the Russian Energy Ministry, announced the deal on Friday. The new deal will add to an already lucrative deal Russia signed with India in Nov. 2021 to supply 40 million tons of coal.Russia, China agree new coal deal for 100 million ton supply: state media
A former defense official previously told Fox News Digital that Russia and China's energy relationship could provide economic relief in the event of US sanctions.www.foxnews.com
"Now, an intergovernmental agreement with the People’s Republic of China is being developed and the figure is 100 million tons," he said. "In the coming years, consumers should receive as much coal as they need."
Great times for Statesman Mr Vlad.
Add on record sales for Gas and Oil and Russia is rolling in money and contrasts with the US Banana state that is flat broke and in debt to 200--300 trillion .
A technical US condition called Bankruptcy .
Germany likes having a Russian leash around it's neck.Germany killed it's nuke program to move to renewables which were utterly insufficient and unreliable-
nothing to do with Ukraine. It had to rely on freaking wood pellets for heat.
Now with Nordstream2 (eventually ) opening it will get it's reliable LNG supplies from Russia
If it had just stuck with nuclear it wouldnt be so unreliable and be more independent on Russia
Sorry, but I don't buy into this doomsday thinking.other people make 'bad decisions' but we pay the penalties by not exporting coal as LNG prices rise
the ridiculous Paris Accord that Biden bought back into :
Countries like China got a free pass to pollute for over a decade. With abundant low-cost coal, China and India would put our manufacturers at a huge competitive disadvantage. Economic costs would be severe.President Trump is right to get us out of the bad Paris climate accord: Sen. Barrasso
Paris Agreement puts America at a competitive disadvantage, writes Sen. John Barrasso, chairman of the Committee on Environment and Public Works.www.usatoday.com
NERA uses a ridiculous model that straight up assumes no innovation occurs whatsoever. Laughable.According to the National Economic Research Associates, if we met all of our commitments as part of the Paris climate agreement, it would cost the American economy $3 trillion and 6.5 million industrial sector jobs by 2040. We don’t need to cripple our economy to protect our environment.
Further proof that our economy does not get devastated by reducing emissions.America’s emissions actually continue to decline, and we are the world’s driver of innovative solutions. Since 2005, the United States has reduced its combustion-related carbon dioxide emissions more than any other nation in the world. Global emissions have moved in the opposite direction.
Germany killed it's nuke program to move to renewables which were utterly insufficient and unreliable-
nothing to do with Ukraine. It had to rely on freaking wood pellets for heat.
Now with Nordstream2 (eventually ) opening it will get it's reliable LNG supplies from Russia
If it had just stuck with nuclear it wouldnt be so unreliable and be more independent on Russia
I think we are , but green has to phase in with market value. im not sure we are doing thatWell, it looks like Russia and China listen to me. I say, use it up and they go ahead.
Note it says in the coming years, meaning we better come up with an alternative.
"Other people make bad decisions so we should also make bad decisions!"
Excuse me, what?
so why are we (USA) buying into Paris if India and China are still burning tons of coal?
China gets an exemption for a "developing country?" LMAO @USA dummies & Paris in general <--comment
Sergey Mochalnikov, the head of the Russian Energy Ministry, announced the deal on Friday. The new deal will add to an already lucrative deal Russia signed with India in Nov. 2021 to supply 40 million tons of coal.Russia, China agree new coal deal for 100 million ton supply: state media
A former defense official previously told Fox News Digital that Russia and China's energy relationship could provide economic relief in the event of US sanctions.www.foxnews.com
"Now, an intergovernmental agreement with the People’s Republic of China is being developed and the figure is 100 million tons," he said. "In the coming years, consumers should receive as much coal as they need."
While there are some benefits in terms of new shipping lanes in the Arctic, there's the problem of methane being released due to the melting permafrost; the latter has also caused a lot of problems for anything built on top of permafrost.Russia WANTS global warming. They'd be crazy not to.
A persistent rumour has been that Vlad recruited Mutte when he was in Dresden as a KGB officer and she was a young firebrand east German politician obviously determined 'to go places '.Germany killed it's nuke program to move to renewables which were utterly insufficient and unreliable-
nothing to do with Ukraine. It had to rely on freaking wood pellets for heat.
Now with Nordstream2 (eventually ) opening it will get it's reliable LNG supplies from Russia
If it had just stuck with nuclear it wouldnt be so unreliable and be more independent on Russia
I think we are , but green has to phase in with market value. im not sure we are doing that
and Paris gives a vastly unfair advantage to China
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?