You don't have to be paid to be a public figure.
Not sure if this has been posted or not. Apologies if so.
ACQ: Clear Channel (facebook) | Shelley Berkley for Senate
I am truly entertained at how loyal dittoheads are.
Because at the time of Rush's pie hole diarrhea that's precisely what she was. Spin it any way you like. The courts will ultimately decide. And from what I am seeing, Fluke has a very good case.
I don't listen to Rush, honey.
There are not many precedents of women going to court to prove they are not a slut, but we'll see how that works out for her. .
Well then there's the prostitute claim...and the porno videos claim. Last time I checked, calling someone a prostitute was far more egregious than calling someone a slut. One is a crime. That's a serious claim and, in my view is slanderous.
Well then there's the prostitute claim...and the porno videos claim. Last time I checked, calling someone a prostitute was far more egregious than calling someone a slut. One is a crime. That's a serious claim and, in my view is slanderous.
Not sure if this has been posted or not. Apologies if so.
ACQ: Clear Channel (facebook) | Shelley Berkley for Senate
LAS VEGAS — At the University Medical Center here, alarms were set off three years ago — kidney transplants were failing at unusually high rates, and some patients were even dying.
Federal regulators moved to shut down the kidney transplant program, but the proposed penalty brought a rebuke from Representative Shelley Berkley, Democrat of Nevada, who helped lead a successful effort to get the officials from Washington to back down.
In pleading for a reprieve, Ms. Berkley and other members of Nevada’s Congressional delegation said they were acting on behalf of the state’s families, citing dire health consequences if the program was halted. But the congresswoman’s efforts also benefited her husband, a physician whose nephrology practice directs medical services at the hospital’s kidney care department — an arrangement that expanded after her intervention and is now reflected in a $738,000-a-year contract with the hospital.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/06/us/06berkley.html?pagewanted=all
Well then she can prove she is not a prostitute.
There's a brilliant suggestion. Try selling that nonsense to a judge.
Have you beaten you children yet today? Seriously.
she certainly is a political prostitute and saying if she wants someone to pay for her sex that makes her a prostitute.
the feigned indignation by the loony left is hilarious
what happened to feminist warriors being tough and resilient?
they now have become blushing little catholic school girls who take offense over minor nothings
There's a brilliant suggestion. Try selling that nonsense to a judge.
Have you beaten you children yet today? Seriously.
Exactly. How can she prove she was defamed?
Can she prove she is not a slut or prostitute? .
My guess is that in the not-so-long term the Dems will lose again.
Yawn-why are you so agitated over this activist getting trashed by the fat man
I have a daughter in college. I can only imagine how a Father would feel. What he did was criminal.
Um, No, no it isn't....Unless you can cite the statute he violated in the criminal code.
j-mac
.....
Then lets see those headlines.
.....
I go with it was low class, mean spirited, lacking any semblence of logic and just plain stupid. Any illegality would just be piling on.
:coffeepap
U.S. Catholic bishops oppose Obama birth-control plan
U.S. Catholic bishops oppose Obama birth-control plan | Reuters
Bishops Reject White House’s New Plan on Contraception
LAURIE GOODSTEIN
Published: February 11, 2012
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/12/us/catholic-bishops-criticize-new-contraception-proposal.html?_r=1
Catholic bishops reject Obama's 'accommodation' on birth control
By Mike Lillis - 02/11/12 01:15 PM ET
Catholic bishops reject Obama's 'accommodation' on birth control - The Hill's Healthwatch
Gingrich, Catholic bishops attack Obama's birth control policy
Read more: Gingrich, Catholic bishops attack Obama's birth control policy
Catholic Bishops Oppose Compromise on Birth-Control Insurance
Catholic Bishops Oppose Obama Compromise on Birth-Control Insurance - WSJ.com
Again, SO WHAT? Their doctrine opposes this mandate from the administration in violation of the Constitution....What should they do? Shut up and take it?
j-mac
Um, No, no it isn't....Unless you can cite the statute he violated in the criminal code.
j-mac
Gloria Allred, the famed celebrity lawyer, sent a letter to the Palm Beach County Attorney's Office on Thursday saying prosecutors should consider a charge under an 1883 law making it a misdemeanor to question a woman's chastity.
"He has personally targeted her and vilified her, and he should have to bear the consequences of his extremely outrageous, tasteless and damaging conduct," Allred said in a phone interview Friday.
Limbaugh had no immediate comment on the letter and didn't address it in the opening hour of his radio show Friday.
Denise Nieman, the county attorney, said she forwarded the letter to the state attorney's office, which handles criminal matters. The state attorney's office had no immediate comment.
Allred focused her efforts on Palm Beach because Limbaugh both lives and broadcasts his show from the county. She cited a state law that says, "Whoever speaks of and concerning any woman, married or unmarried, falsely and maliciously imputing to her a want of chastity, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree."
Be honest. This is not the church having to do, but the businesses the church has branched out into. There is a difference.
Non profits, and charity hospitals are being targeted for the mandate. Look, when you go to work for someone, you don't own the job, further, if you don't like the pay package then don't take the job....Far too often libs believe that they can take the job and force the change they want....This is backwards, and incorrect.
j-mac
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?