- Joined
- Oct 4, 2011
- Messages
- 27,204
- Reaction score
- 13,299
- Location
- CT
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Well, considering that the source is "The Daily Paul", it's not surprising that they chose the word "banned".
They have a right to exclude him. Where does it say that they are obligated to include everyone in the debate? I love the feigned outrage from people here. People suddenly become Constitutional scholars when something happens that they don't agree with.
They have a right to exclude him. Where does it say that they are obligated to include everyone in the debate? I love the feigned outrage from people here. People suddenly become Constitutional scholars when something happens that they don't agree with.
If the American people do not put their feet down, and stop the establishment from putting the people who they say we can choose from, in front of us, they might as well as write our ballot for us.
I think one person mentioned the Constitution.
If the American people do not put their feet down, and stop the establishment from putting the people who they say we can choose from, in front of us, they might as well as write our ballot for us.
If the American people do not put their feet down, and stop the establishment from putting the people who they say we can choose from, in front of us, they might as well as write our ballot for us.
I can firmly say that I neither love nor hate Ron Paul.
What is it about, then?
Not for me. I'm honestly curious about your reasoning here.
Which is whom I was referring to.
I am outraged that people think he has some sort of right to be at this debate. It's a private function. No one has a right to be there, and the group holding it has every right to deny any one they want from attending.
Being as your a leftie, you really wouldn't have a problem, but what if they said Perry's views were too extreme? Huntsman? Where does it end? Sure, the Jewish coalition is hosting it, but it's on national television, and millions of people will be watching it. So, by excluding Dr. Paul and saying he's "too extreme", that opinion will likely be cemented in millions of people's minds. You'll agree with it until it is your candidate.
some people take electing a president to lightly any more!
we as citizens have this wonderful right and some take it very serious.
99% of the people will never get a chance to meet the people running for president and we depend on the national debates to actually get to know them and their views. it has become easier i will admit with the internet, but this is the way most of america will determine who the actually agree with the most.
we constantly have the media trying to sway our decisions and now it seams there is no place left to actually get a fair look at all the candidates together!
IMO then you should have.
It's one debate. By not including him in the debate they aren't deciding whom we can choose from. You are overreacting.
It's one debate. By not including him in the debate they aren't deciding whom we can choose from. You are overreacting.
You give them a foot then they'll want a mile. We have to nip this in the bud. Let the people decide if Paul's views are "too extreme." Not a bunch of biased people.
You give them a foot then they'll want a mile. We have to nip this in the bud. Let the people decide if Paul's views are "too extreme." Not a bunch of biased people.
They can exclude him for whatever reason they want. They aren't obligated to include him. Get over it.
do you think Paul is more extreme than Bachmann? than Cain?
Being as your a leftie, you really wouldn't have a problem, but what if they said Perry's views were too extreme? Huntsman? Where does it end? Sure, the Jewish coalition is hosting it, but it's on national television, and millions of people will be watching it. So, by excluding Dr. Paul and saying he's "too extreme", that opinion will likely be cemented in millions of people's minds. You'll agree with it until it is your candidate.
It's one debate. By not including him in the debate they aren't deciding whom we can choose from. You are overreacting.
You give them a foot then they'll want a mile. We have to nip this in the bud. Let the people decide if Paul's views are "too extreme." Not a bunch of biased people.
you would be winning this argument, if it were not for the anti-Semitism in the OP. please realize that and dont do it again.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?