• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ron DeSantis Says Floridians Have Right to Hit Protesters With Cars

I'm not a fan of this, but when I see a miles long traffic jam because people are blocking a road I quickly lose sympathy for them.

I don't want people getting hit with cars. Find a way to punish these morons more severely in the criminal process. Don't let them off with a disorderly conduct charge.
 
You don't think that she deserved to be met with force as she was aggressively breaking into a secure federal building holding many elected officials?

I didn't have you defending Ashli Babbitt on my bingo card.



Lol....it really bothers you that I'm not actually religious, eh?

All religions are fairy tales, the Jesus story included. Hence why there are countless other religious figures with virtually the same story as Jesus who predated him.
Why would I defend her actions? In my mind, she took one for the team. If she had climbed through, how many more do you think would have followed? There is nothing you can say about that day that makes those folks right. I'm not religious, so why would you not being religious bother me?
 
You don't have the right to threaten, assault or falsely imprison others and then pretend like it's a legal form of protest.
Oh please, deporting people without proper legal methods doesn't seem to bother many in America, hell they cheer it. Let's try to keep off the high and mighty horse.
 
Why would I defend her actions?

Why would you claim that I denied what she did when I literally said that she deserved what she got?

In my mind, she took one for the team. If she had climbed through, how many more do you think would have followed?

Likely a lot.

There is nothing you can say about that day that makes those folks right.

This is my problem with your posts. You keep making assertions that I've somehow denied things about J6 or defended their actions when I have not ever done that. I literally said that Babbitt deserved to be shot and everyone rioting there deserved to go to prison.

How does that translate in your mind to me trying to say things "about that day that makes those folks right"...?

I'm not religious, so why would you not being religious bother me?

You brought up my avatar (which is a joke btw) on your own, not me. Why introduce the topic of religion if you don't care about it?
 
LOL. You still don't get it. No one has to give anyone that right ...

Soon you'll suffocate if the government doesn't give you the right to breathe.
I get it, you don't like government and you think it controls you. My rights are what I take according to you.
 
Oh please, deporting people without proper legal methods doesn't seem to bother many in America, hell they cheer it. Let's try to keep off the high and mighty horse.

1. Expedited deportation without a hearing is completely legal in the US.
2. You're suggesting that criminals who threaten, assault, and falsely imprison others should be allowed to engage in these crimes without consequence because illegal immigrants get deported. That's an absolutely moronic argument.
 
Why would you claim that I denied what she did when I literally said that she deserved what she got?



Likely a lot.



This is my problem with your posts. You keep making assertions that I've somehow denied things about J6 or defended their actions when I have not ever done that. I literally said that Babbitt deserved to be shot and everyone rioting there deserved to go to prison.

How does that translate in your mind to me trying to say things "about that day that makes those folks right"...?



You brought up my avatar (which is a joke btw) on your own, not me. Why introduce the topic of religion if you don't care about it?
I didn't say you denied you thought she deserved what she got. Where did that even come from? Maybe I brought it up because of your avatar and your non caring attitude?
 
1. Expedited deportation without a hearing is completely legal in the US.
2. You're suggesting that criminals who threaten, assault, and falsely imprison others should be allowed to engage in these crimes without consequence because illegal immigrants get deported. That's an absolutely moronic argument.
I suggested no such thing. Trump is falsely imprisoning people. Crossing the border illegally is a misdemeanor, you folks treat it like they are mass murderers.
 
I didn't say you denied you thought she deserved what she got. Where did that even come from? Maybe I brought it up because of your avatar and your non caring attitude?

You asked this:

Why does this not apply to the 1/6 people? Or the idiots who march with Nazi flags chanting Jews will not replace us. Very fine people indeed.

Then I proceeded to show you my posts from earlier in the thread where I clearly said it DOES apply to the 1/6 people, including Babbitt.

Then you said this:

You dishonor your avatar by dismissing things we all know happened.

So, in the context of the above interaction, what things that happened were you accusing me of dismissing? Since you were literally responding to me talking about Babbitt getting what she deserved, I don't see anything else you could've been referencing.
 
I suggested no such thing.

Sure you did. You want to excuse people who threaten, assault, and falsely imprison others while disingenuously calling it a "protest" and you said that we shouldn't worry about people doing such things because illegal immigrants are getting deported.

Trump is falsely imprisoning people.

Deporting illegal immigrants =/= falsely imprisoning

Crossing the border illegally is a misdemeanor, you folks treat it like they are mass murderers.

Incorrect. If they were being treated like mass murderers, they'd be thrown in prison for life or giving the death penalty depending on the state.
 
Sure you did. You want to excuse people who threaten, assault, and falsely imprison others while disingenuously calling it a "protest" and you said that we shouldn't worry about people doing such things because illegal immigrants are getting deported.



Deporting illegal immigrants =/= falsely imprisoning



Incorrect. If they were being treated like mass murderers, they'd be thrown in prison for life or giving the death penalty depending on the state.
Ok you win, have a great day.
 
Well I mean if you're just driving down the street and all of a sudden people rush in who weren't there, that could be one thing. But if you're driving down the street and come across a huge protest and decide to try to drive through it....that's a different ballgame.
Understood. That's why he said "and a mob surrounds your vehicle" as the criteria.
 
Large groups of people aren't necessarily hard to miss.

People shouldn't block traffic and if they don't have permits and are blocking roads, the police can be called in to manage the situation. But that doesn't mean that if you see a large group of people blocking the road that you can just plow on through it.

Yeah, if you start pushing through a crowd of people with a vehicle, you've initiated the conflict.

Turn around, find a different road.

Nope. Even if someone is jaywalking, you can't run them over.

The word choice is all over the place to try and turn the rioters and lawbreakers into victims and innocent civilians just minding their own business and properly using the roads they pay for the way they were designed and intended to be used into criminals.
 
Nothing unique about Dear Leader at all, huh? Just your average establishment politician/monied elitist.

Nothing unique about politicians being psychopaths, no. Been going on long before the United States even existed.
 
The word choice is all over the place to try and turn the rioters and lawbreakers into victims and innocent civilians just minding their own business and properly using the roads they pay for the way they were designed and intended to be used into criminals.
They'd only be criminals if they tried to drive through a crowd of people.
 
Back
Top Bottom