• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ron DeSantis Says Floridians Have Right to Hit Protesters With Cars

Only as an only option to protect one self. That is what the OP is about.

I see you did not read the link in the OP.

"Protecting oneself" is your code for "they're making me mad and I don't like them." Your deflection seems to be trivializing, even condoning this violence.
 
I'm not the police chief, wasn't talking about the police chief, and wasn't talking about what the police chief was supposedly talking about, so why are you quoting me and asking your non sequitur?

He’s doing that a lot in this thread, that’s for sure.
 
Personally, I just think they’re trying to be cute with disingenuous obtuseness.

Fortunately for us, that leftist shtick doesn’t work so well anymore.

Maybe in some cases, but others take that anti-self defense notion from thread to thread, topic to topic.

It is hilarious though, when you run across someone marginalizing self defense in one case, and pervertedly trying to paint murder as some sort of self defense in another.
 
You do understand there is a legal difference between those two "threats"? The "threat" one presumes of a party you vehemently disagree with politically and the threat that is articulable to above a reasonable man standard that one's very life was IMMEDIATELY at risk of being extinguished.
Yes, I do. Why do you guys not understand what was said in the link in the OP. I responded to a different question than the OP message.
 
"Protecting oneself" is your code for "they're making me mad and I don't like them." Your deflection seems to be trivializing, even condoning this violence.
How many protestors get run over by cars when standing peacefully and legally on the sidewalk?
 
First I have no desire to align myself with where DeSantis seems to be trolling with this.

However I have to point out one thing from a legal perspective. The 2017 ruling about driving a vehicle INTO a group of protesters is NOT the same thing as driving OUT of a group of protesters IF those protesters are a definitive threat to your life or threatening mayhem.

Example: If your vehicle got surrounded in a protest by nine people pinning you on all sides and three of them in front of you proceeded to light molotov cocktails and indicate they were going to firebomb your vehicle with you in it; I doubt you'd find a prosecutor who would bring charges against you for running those three over to escape to protect your life and your passengers. IF one did, I doubt a jury would convict you.

Just pointing out that there is a difference. We can't harm others because we don't like what they stand for or they make us scared. We are allowed, when we can absolutely articulate within a reasonable man standard the case for preservation of self, the right to save our own lives or the lives of innocent third parties.
Yep. This is the distinction. If a person is fleeing, this is completely different than if a person put themself there with intent.
 
"Protecting oneself" is your code for "they're making me mad and I don't like them." Your deflection seems to be trivializing, even condoning this violence.
What about the times it is real? Do you deny the facts just because you gravitate to a perverted view of the threat?
 
Self defense is a positive defense.
The left wants to take over by not allowing self defense. Like guns. They want to take away all means we have of self defense against their hostilities and attacks.
 
Only as an only option to protect one self. That is what the OP is about.

I see you did not read the link in the OP.

I did, and I have NO doubt DeSantis is politically trolling. Saying one thing just on the right side of the law and signalling something else to those he wants to gain political favor with.
 
The left wants to take over by not allowing self defense. Like guns. They want to take away all means we have of self defense against their hostilities and attacks.

The right wants violence everywhere. This is why "people" such as DeathSantis want malicious people to run over protesters.
 
Protesting on public roads is about as American as apple pie, fascist
Americans do not take away the free travel of other Americans. That is shameful and authoritarian. Thinking they have a right to impede others.
 
The left wants to take over by not allowing self defense. Like guns. They want to take away all means we have of self defense against their hostilities and attacks.

Do you think Europeans can't defend themselves because we have gun laws?
 
Americans do not take away the free travel of other Americans. That is shameful and authoritarian. Thinking they have a right to impede others.
You should probably murder them with yoir car then
 
The right wants violence everywhere. This is why "people" such as DeathSantis want malicious people to run over protesters.
I see you still did not read his words. If you did, our public school systems severely failed you.
 
And you’re doing the exact inverse of that.

Some of us, however, are consistent with applying logic.

Hence why several of us have said that Babbitt deserved what she got and that the other J6 rioters deserved to go to prison.
MAGA gave the family of Ashli Babbit $5M for her act of suicidal terrorism, like how the Jihadists in the Middle East will pay the families of their suicide bomber terrorists.
 

Just more right wing suppression of free speech, coming from DeSantis here with his looking to ramp up stochastic terrorism and have protesters get killed and ran over by drivers.
So, a mob of people surrounding your car, perhaps to start jumping on your hood, banging on your windshield and passenger-side windows or bricking them to try and break them and extricate you from your vehicle to beat you senseless, THAT is free speech to you? That is what DeSantis is talking about here. A MOB surrounding your vehicle and impeding your progress. You HAVE to assume, for your own safety, that they are not attempting to sell you cookies. You stomp on that pedal and get your ass out of there.
 
I see you still did not read his words. If you did, our public school systems severely failed you.

And there's the ad hom attack. Was wondering when you would resort to that! :ROFLMAO:
 
You should probably murder them with yoir car then
Your resposne clearly shows you fail to comprehend the argument. You are attacking a point nobody is saying. It is impossible to argue against that, as nobody is making that stupid claim.
 
Your resposne clearly shows you fail to comprehend the argument. You are attacking a point nobody is saying. It is impossible to argue against that, as nobody is making that stupid claim.
No I get it. Ya'll are just imagining in your head running over protesters and getting hard on the thought
 
MAGA gave the family of Ashli Babbit $5M for her act of suicidal terrorism, like how the Jihadists in the Middle East will pay the families of their suicide bomber terrorists.

Why are you tagging me in a nonsensical and rambling post that doesn’t have anything to do with anything I’ve said?
 
Back
Top Bottom