Centinel
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2011
- Messages
- 2,984
- Reaction score
- 1,366
- Location
- Penn's Woods
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Yikes, the threats of violence are coming fast and furious.And I would suppose with more people than jobs, without a living wage or government assistance, like animals, they will kill those with food to prevent starvation.
Great plan you've got there!
NOt at all-just making a point that you seem to miss. when people become dependent on someone else feeding them, they tend to lose the ability or desire to feed themselves, which of course is what big government turds want
Sounds intriguing. Care to elaborate?
You lefties keep threatening violence
trust me catawba, that's not a game you want to play. You will lose
You lefties keep threatening violence
trust me catawba, that's not a game you want to play. You will lose
they are depenndent because their is no alternative and some people ( as i already pointed out) are working full time but still require food assitance because they are not earning enough money to live. You want to help the poor then you need to increase the amount of skilled jobs and raise the min wage and then maybe when they are back on their feet you can look at cutting federal support. You can not simply just wean people off support because they actually need it to to survive. If you pull out that rug from underneath then you will have civil unrest on your hands that will make the LA riots look like a day at disney land.
I see. Violence. I can't sign onto that agenda. You know, thou shall not steal, murder, etc.Moscow 1918
The French Revolution 1799....do some reading
Its not a game, if you were forced to choose between starvation and crime, which would you choose?
im sure that is what the Tsars and the white army said as well...rich never learn
I doubt you have spent much time with the hard core armed part of america.
I love the threats, and its the dems whose policies create tons of dependent people
but hey if they want to riot that is one way of solving the problem.
God no, I actually served so I dont need to watch some grown men play army....
Not necessary, all we have to do is vote in November to end the supply side economics that is killing the country.
Where do you suppose you will go when life becomes as horrible for the rich as it was under the tax rates of the 90's?
I doubt I'd be put in that position. but whenever you want to start your rebellion let me know. I will bring hotdogs and marshmellows
It's interesting to watch liberals attempt to stand for the poor by taking money away from charity contributors and giving it to federal bureaucrats.
what do you want-socialism or just raping the rich as much as possible?
You can't answer the question honestly, so you ignore it.
Thanks for the demonstration of your integrity.
LOL!!! You have a very distorted memory of the 90's!
so you want another dot com bubble? that is what made Clinton's policies somewhat successful for a few years
Your posts really have not demonstrated any integrity and your posts here are nothing more than rants about the wealthy in general and Romney in particular
And cutting spending and increasing revenues had nothing to do with it?
I advocate helping the poor through changes on the economic level and find helping people in the way it done now works against the poor and everyone else as it makes them poorer and everyone else in extension. I would think people that are always wanting to take others property to help the poor can pick up the slack since there appears to be so many of them.
Moscow 1918
The French Revolution 1799....do some reading
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?